Biden? Or his nonexistent crowds? Remember that hoot of a townhall he had with a dozen people, all six feet from each other?

Some very good shooting there!!

It will be interesting to see if things change (with COVID) after the upcoming Party Congress.

@Horace said in Nobel Prize: "Spooky" explained: I wonder if an explanation theory exists? I was thinking the same thing. They say it is real, but I do not see how the proof is.

One of the giants of the country music genre - up there with Patsy Cline. Can’t even begin to imagine the artists she influenced. The real deal too - grew up knowing what hard times were. R.I.P.

Some one of these days white people are going to get tired of this stupidity.

@George-K said in Trump sues CNN for defamation: The complaint is here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.621239/gov.uscourts.flsd.621239.1.0.pdf Some poor fucker has to read all that whining. I hope he gets well paid.

Fennel is great stuff. So is apples and onions, and especially apples and cheeses. I discovered that in college when the cheapest thing in the cafeteria was a nice big red delicious with a hunk of cheddar.

It was an accident. The man who fired the shot that struck an anti-abortion rights canvasser in the shoulder last week called it an accident but also said the volunteer had been arguing with his wife, who supports abortion rights, and refused to leave their property. “I came out and she (the volunteer) is screaming and having a great old time, and being told, I’m sure I heard at least a dozen times, ‘You’re trespassing, get off the property,'” 74-year-old Richard Harvey, wearing a “Facts Matter” baseball cap, told News 8 on Tuesday. The shooting happened near Lake Odessa on Sept. 20. The 83-year-old victim volunteers for Right to Life, which says she was peaceful and was walking away when she was shot in the back. Harvey disputes that. Grandma deserved it. She was a "right wing nut." Harvey has admitted to firing a warning shot at Jacobson before shooting the elderly woman but claims it was an accident. Jacobson and her attorney say that’s completely false and point out that Richard Harvey had already fired a warning shot and Jacobson had turned away to leave the couple’s property in her vehicle. Now, in the new 911 call, Sharon Harvey tells the dispatcher that Jacobson :was in some coalition to stop the vote on Proposal 3.” Richard then adds, “She’s a right wing nut” — making his motive to shoot Jacobson very clear.

Little ratbastard.

Hope the above diagram helps to prove I'm right and you're wrong.

Retire. And be rich.

Good one.

@LuFins-Dad said in Wouldn't that be polyamory? It's confusing...: @Jolly said in Wouldn't that be polyamory? It's confusing...: https://www.frontpagemag.com/ny-judge-rules-polygamy-on-same-level-as-couple-relationships/ Sorry, George has me on this one... https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/19484/why-stop-at-throuples You even replied to that thread before posting this! Gimmee a break, I do three boards...

Over the past 40 years, we have seen a bizarre shift where as a whole we no longer understand the difference between causal and corollary relationships. Most unfortunately, this has even moved into science and medicine.

Woman's definition of a bastard: A man with a three-inch dick and a ten-inch tongue, and all he wants to do is screw.

It's his schtick. Like Ann, I find him occasionally entertaining. I make no pretensions about being in the political middle. The only thing in the middle of the road is a yellow stripe and dead armadillos.

The jokes have been flying among my old “Debit Suisse” buddies but this is overblown and they’ll be fine.

@Jolly said in The New Term: https://www.npr.org/2022/10/03/1126041958/supreme-court-new-term a tumultuous term a second potentially stormy term sustained and dramatic turn to the right overturning of a half century of precedents it finds its approval ratings plummeting And that's in the first two paragraphs. The starkest question is whether the previous decisions were grievously wrong, the same rationale the court majority used last term in overturning Roe v. Wade. Good, now do Plessy. Since 2013, the court has struck down or neutered key provisions of the landmark 1965 law "Neutered." Nice. It's a shame that Ginsburg isn't around to proofread Totenberg's screed.