Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The wrinkle in fighting loan forgiveness

The wrinkle in fighting loan forgiveness

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
7 Posts 3 Posters 67 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Our good friend ‘legal standing’. Congress has it, but Pelosi and Schumer aren’t going to challenge it. One could imagine a GOP lead house challenging it after January. The awkward part is by then it would have been disbursed.

    If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      what a mess. If I were the Dems, I'd be shouting this to the rafters,

      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        There are smart lawyers in the gop pursuing other avenues I’m sure. But it’s not clear they’ll find another way.

        If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I would think a citizen could bring suit claiming an unconstitutional action.

          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            You have to be harmed by it. And taxpayer status has never been sufficient.

            If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              I’m the short term loan servicing companies might have standing as they’ll be harmed by this.

              If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
                #7

                What about the states? They wouldn't have the standing to prevent the implementation but they could have the standing to ask for a delay in implementation. If states are going to tax this as income, then it will have an impact on income-based financial aid including need-based scholarships and grants. Requesting a 3-4 month injunction to allow them to reevaluate their financial aid packages would certainly be reasonable.

                The Brad

                1 Reply Last reply
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups