Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Puzzle time - the Fibonacci numbers

Puzzle time - the Fibonacci numbers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
31 Posts 4 Posters 310 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    I use 8086 assembler for such tasks.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Are you two about to have a 'my dick is smaller' contest?

      I was only joking

      KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
      • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

        Are you two about to have a 'my dick is smaller' contest?

        KlausK Offline
        KlausK Offline
        Klaus
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        @Doctor-Phibes Did you know that dick sizes have a Fibonacci distribution? It's a distribution with a very long tail...

        <insert @George-K rimshot image macro here>

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          Interesting observation:

          Cycle lengths 2^n = 3*2^(n-1) at least within the first 100. Does that continue?

          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          @jon-nyc said in Puzzle time - the Fibonacci numbers:

          Interesting observation:

          Cycle lengths 2^n = 3*2^(n-1) at least within the first 100. Does that continue?

          bump for Klaus and his little 4 line program.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            @jon-nyc said in Puzzle time - the Fibonacci numbers:

            Interesting observation:

            Cycle lengths 2^n = 3*2^(n-1) at least within the first 100. Does that continue?

            bump for Klaus and his little 4 line program.

            KlausK Offline
            KlausK Offline
            Klaus
            wrote on last edited by Klaus
            #21

            @jon-nyc said in Puzzle time - the Fibonacci numbers:

            @jon-nyc said in Puzzle time - the Fibonacci numbers:

            Interesting observation:

            Cycle lengths 2^n = 3*2^(n-1) at least within the first 100. Does that continue?

            bump for Klaus and his little 4 line program.

            Can you explain? You mean that the cycle length of Fib mod (2^n) is the same as Fib mod (3*2^(n-1))? That doesn't seem to be true.

            I uploaded the first 10,000 cycle lengths here, if you want to check this yourself.
            https://www.heypasteit.com/clip/0IV18W

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
              #22

              No, the cycle length of Fib mod (2^n) = 3*2^(n-1))

              Check Fmod2, Fmod4, Fmod8, Fmod16 etc for their cycle lengths. You’ll get 3,6,12,24,48 etc. I’m wondering if it holds. I think it will.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • KlausK Offline
                KlausK Offline
                Klaus
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                Here's a list of pairs where the first number shows the "n" (but only for powers of 2) and the second one the associated cycle length. Maybe I missunderstood something but your conjecture doesn't seem to hold.

                [(2,6),(4,24),(8,60),(16,24),(32,36),(64,120),(128,420),(256,264),(512,516),(1024,72),(2048,600),(4096,1368),(8192,720)]
                
                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                  #24

                  But your original list is this one:

                  (left side numbering mine, right side list yours)

                  3e9774ed-e059-4cd4-956f-c8646a08d27b-image.png

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • KlausK Offline
                    KlausK Offline
                    Klaus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Ah, looks like an "off by two" error somewhere. Hmm....

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • KlausK Offline
                      KlausK Offline
                      Klaus
                      wrote on last edited by Klaus
                      #26

                      Turned out to be two "off by 1" errors that have to do with indices starting at 0 and not 1.

                      What about this result?

                      [(2,3),(4,6),(8,12),(16,24),(32,48),(64,96),(128,192),(256,384),(512,768),(1024,1536),(2048,3072),(4096,6144),(8192,12288)]
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • KlausK Offline
                        KlausK Offline
                        Klaus
                        wrote on last edited by Klaus
                        #27

                        It looks like linear relations between the cycle length happen quite frequently. This is a scatter plot of the cycle lengths I computed above (haven't used R in a while - fun for plotting data!). Observe all the dotted lines. The points you identified are on one of those lines. Also interesting to see a few outliers.

                        440d6f5b-c0a6-4d2d-b301-7d3d66c1fafd-image.png

                        I have marked the points you are interested in in red. You see that there are way more points on that line.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          Interesting.

                          So it turns out Fibonacci cycle lengths a thing people study. They’re called Pisano numbers and understanding them is really about understanding Pisano numbers for prime powers.

                          A neat property is that if n and m are coprime then period(mn) is least common multiple of period(n) and period(m).

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            Wait a minute, is that really your graph up there? This is from Wiki

                            396851CA-71EE-4E8B-AB14-42964B4121AC.png

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • KlausK Offline
                              KlausK Offline
                              Klaus
                              wrote on last edited by Klaus
                              #30

                              Yes, it's my graph. I haven't seen the WIki graph yet, but it shows the same data, so of course it's similar. It's an interesting coincidence that they also cut off at 10,000.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • KlausK Offline
                                KlausK Offline
                                Klaus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                Just for fun, here's the continuation of the dataset for cycle lengths up to 20000.

                                1549ea7c-ea85-4eca-aea0-3b73c980f9aa-image.png

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • Users
                                • Groups