@LuFins-Dad said in Interesting post:
@jon-nyc said in Interesting post:
I think you missed to comedy of the post you referenced and assume it meant all published science is flawless
Not at all, the meme is meant as a joke and an eyeroll at the internet rando that disputes the findings of the vaunted and elite scientist.
My personal view is that more and more of what is being published as science anymore really isn’t. And more and more often, internet randos are catching flaws in the method.
There are a lot of factors at play, but the biggest problem these days seems to be “trust” as opposed independent challenge or verification. A physician reads a study and says “wow! I wouldn’t have thought that!! But it’s peer reviewed and in a trusted journal, so it must be the truth.” And now an absurd concept becomes “scientific consensus”.
Examples of this are becoming more and more evident, and I don’t think it’s appropriate to try and make fun of the general person that’s willing to challenge one of these assertions.
Two things can't be true at once:
The "scientific consensus" regarding anything political, is overtly politicized. (Who can ever forget the timeless "racism is a public health concern which makes public gatherings during COVID ok"?)
People who view scientific consensus about political things with a ton of skepticism are sneer-worthy rubes
I guess one can pick and choose which to believe, if either. But anybody who believes both, gets my sneer.