Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. It gets personal

It gets personal

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
60 Posts 14 Posters 803 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on 16 Mar 2025, 20:20 last edited by
    #41

    FIRE’s take.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • J jon-nyc
      16 Mar 2025, 20:16

      These are ‘preconditions’ set by the administration that are supposed to be met before they will sit down with Columbia.

      https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/6d3c124d8e20212d/85dec154-full.pdf

      One wonders what the negotiations would then be about.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mik
      wrote on 16 Mar 2025, 20:39 last edited by
      #42

      @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

      These are ‘preconditions’ set by the administration that are supposed to be met before they will sit down with Columbia.

      https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/6d3c124d8e20212d/85dec154-full.pdf

      One wonders what the negotiations would then be about.

      alt text

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        blondie
        wrote on 16 Mar 2025, 22:43 last edited by
        #43

        @kluurs Both of us here are thinking of the 2 of you there, hoping your wife’s research can continue. I can’t imagine having my life long passion, my area of expertise, being axed, after decades of contributing such good for medical research.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • J jon-nyc
          16 Mar 2025, 20:16

          These are ‘preconditions’ set by the administration that are supposed to be met before they will sit down with Columbia.

          https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/6d3c124d8e20212d/85dec154-full.pdf

          One wonders what the negotiations would then be about.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on 16 Mar 2025, 22:55 last edited by
          #44

          @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

          These are ‘preconditions’ set by the administration that are supposed to be met before they will sit down with Columbia.

          https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/6d3c124d8e20212d/85dec154-full.pdf

          One wonders what the negotiations would then be about.

          I don't have too many problems with the preconditions. I'm not sure about the receivership, as that goes too far.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • R Offline
            R Offline
            Renauda
            wrote on 16 Mar 2025, 23:44 last edited by
            #45

            I'm not sure about the receivership, as that goes too far.

            I can’t imagine why you might think that. It is, after all, just one those useless touchy-feely interdisciplinary social science programmes. Or would you like it to be a Bible Studies programme under the guise of interdisciplinary studies programme? Just asking.

            Elbows up!

            1 Reply Last reply
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on 16 Mar 2025, 23:59 last edited by Jolly
              #46

              BTW, using Federal funds as a bludgeoning tool of compliance is nothing new.

              In 1979, I was attending a private college. The Feds dropped in and told the College Administration you don't have enough black students. The college replied that 13% of the student body is black and here is documentation of our efforts to recruit more... We are offering substantial scholarships, particularly to those more economically unfortunate, but they must meet entrance criteria (which wasn't onerous, just a 23 ACT and graduation in the top 25% of your class).

              And besides, we don't take any Federal funds. 😛

              Well, said the Feds, the college may not, but your students have Pell Grants and student loans, which we will be happy to terminate.
              Unless you can bring those black student percentages up to at least 20%

              So the college had to find another 100 black students, qualified or not.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • M Mik
                15 Mar 2025, 19:52

                There’s no way to cut painlessly, I agree. I also believe there are taxpayer supported studies that are not worth the expense. But many if not most are. To cut them off in mid study while still proposing deficit spending seems less than due diligence.

                8 Offline
                8 Offline
                89th
                wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 14:08 last edited by
                #47

                @Mik said in It gets personal:

                There’s no way to cut painlessly, I agree. I also believe there are taxpayer supported studies that are not worth the expense. But many if not most are. To cut them off in mid study while still proposing deficit spending seems less than due diligence.

                Yeah agreed. Lazy is a good term for it, chasing headlines is another. As you said, whether it's research grants, or federal employees, or other programs, there is good work out there, perhaps most of the time, and our country is better than the "meh, there will be blood" wrecking ball approach when a smart scalpel could be used to avoid hurting the good work that's out there.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 16:18 last edited by
                  #48

                  Smart scalpel is preferred, but the political will won't be there when you need it.

                  It's going to be the roast chicken method, if it's done

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  8 1 Reply Last reply 17 Mar 2025, 16:25
                  • J Jolly
                    17 Mar 2025, 16:18

                    Smart scalpel is preferred, but the political will won't be there when you need it.

                    It's going to be the roast chicken method, if it's done

                    8 Offline
                    8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 16:25 last edited by
                    #49

                    @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                    Smart scalpel is preferred, but the political will won't be there when you need it.

                    How so? Don't you think an approach where Trump said something like "I'm going to deploy 10 genius analysts into each <whatever> branch and ask them to provide a full report in 6 months of what should be cut immediately and what should be sent back to congress to review appropriations". It doesn't have to take 4 years, but it also doesn't have to take 4 weeks. The latter is reckless and lazy.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 19:31 last edited by Jolly
                      #50

                      A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                      In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                      In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      M L 2 Replies Last reply 17 Mar 2025, 21:26
                      • K Offline
                        K Offline
                        kluurs
                        wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 21:14 last edited by
                        #51

                        Reminds me of a contest at college where they wanted to rename the "Great Hall" into something more interesting. Someone submitted "Nixon's Tomb" - which I thought was wonderful. I was actually on the committee that would decide the name - and spoke forcefully in favor of the name change - but by the time I got done speaking, even I was convinced it wasn't such a great idea since Nixon seemed to take things personal and while it would have made the national news - not the news that would result in good tidings.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • J Jolly
                          17 Mar 2025, 19:31

                          A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                          In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                          In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mik
                          wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 21:26 last edited by
                          #52

                          @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                          A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                          In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                          In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                          Ah, but Macbeth was speaking of murder, not cost cutting. 😄

                          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                          J 1 Reply Last reply 17 Mar 2025, 23:55
                          • J Jolly
                            17 Mar 2025, 19:31

                            A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                            In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                            In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 21:42 last edited by
                            #53

                            @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                            A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                            In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                            In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                            Great. What have they actually cut?

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Copper
                              wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 23:34 last edited by
                              #54

                              All told, more than 30,000 federal employees were fired in recent weeks after the Trump administration directed a mass purge of probationary staff.

                              https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/03/trump-administration-taking-steps-comply-court-orders-reinstate-tens-thousands-fired-workers/403795/

                              8 1 Reply Last reply 18 Mar 2025, 13:37
                              • M Mik
                                17 Mar 2025, 21:26

                                @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                                A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                                In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                                In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                                Ah, but Macbeth was speaking of murder, not cost cutting. 😄

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on 17 Mar 2025, 23:55 last edited by
                                #55

                                @Mik said in It gets personal:

                                @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                                A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                                In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                                In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                                Ah, but Macbeth was speaking of murder, not cost cutting. 😄

                                Well, it is job death for some ...

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on 18 Mar 2025, 00:40 last edited by
                                  #56

                                  A big diabetes study canceled.

                                  IMG_3689.jpeg

                                  Like ours, Columbia was the lead but it funds many centers, in this case over 2 dozen.

                                  IMG_3690.jpeg

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  D 1 Reply Last reply 18 Mar 2025, 01:00
                                  • J jon-nyc
                                    18 Mar 2025, 00:40

                                    A big diabetes study canceled.

                                    IMG_3689.jpeg

                                    Like ours, Columbia was the lead but it funds many centers, in this case over 2 dozen.

                                    IMG_3690.jpeg

                                    D Online
                                    D Online
                                    Doctor Phibes
                                    wrote on 18 Mar 2025, 01:00 last edited by
                                    #57

                                    @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                    A big diabetes study canceled.

                                    And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                    I was only joking

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply 18 Mar 2025, 01:09
                                    • D Doctor Phibes
                                      18 Mar 2025, 01:00

                                      @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                      A big diabetes study canceled.

                                      And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Renauda
                                      wrote on 18 Mar 2025, 01:09 last edited by
                                      #58

                                      @Doctor-Phibes said in It gets personal:

                                      @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                      A big diabetes study canceled.

                                      And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                      POTD

                                      Elbows up!

                                      D 1 Reply Last reply 18 Mar 2025, 01:16
                                      • R Renauda
                                        18 Mar 2025, 01:09

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in It gets personal:

                                        @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                        A big diabetes study canceled.

                                        And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                        POTD

                                        D Online
                                        D Online
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on 18 Mar 2025, 01:16 last edited by Doctor Phibes
                                        #59

                                        @Renauda said in It gets personal:

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in It gets personal:

                                        @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                        A big diabetes study canceled.

                                        And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                        POTD

                                        What is the point of this? Can anybody think of a rationale? Other than buying off RFK, obviously.

                                        I was only joking

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • C Copper
                                          17 Mar 2025, 23:34

                                          All told, more than 30,000 federal employees were fired in recent weeks after the Trump administration directed a mass purge of probationary staff.

                                          https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/03/trump-administration-taking-steps-comply-court-orders-reinstate-tens-thousands-fired-workers/403795/

                                          8 Offline
                                          8 Offline
                                          89th
                                          wrote on 18 Mar 2025, 13:37 last edited by
                                          #60

                                          @Copper said in It gets personal:

                                          All told, more than 30,000 federal employees were fired in recent weeks after the Trump administration directed a mass purge of probationary staff.

                                          https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/03/trump-administration-taking-steps-comply-court-orders-reinstate-tens-thousands-fired-workers/403795/

                                          Keep up! They have been rehired since what Trump did was not legal. Now they're getting paid to play golf! (or whatever they do on paid leave)

                                          25,000 employees... costing us $8 million per day. So much winning!

                                          https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/37080/judge-reverses-mass-firings-of-federal-workers/11

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes

                                          50/60

                                          17 Mar 2025, 19:31


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          50 out of 60
                                          • First post
                                            50/60
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups