Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. It gets personal

It gets personal

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
60 Posts 14 Posters 820 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    These are ‘preconditions’ set by the administration that are supposed to be met before they will sit down with Columbia.

    https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/6d3c124d8e20212d/85dec154-full.pdf

    One wonders what the negotiations would then be about.

    JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

    These are ‘preconditions’ set by the administration that are supposed to be met before they will sit down with Columbia.

    https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/6d3c124d8e20212d/85dec154-full.pdf

    One wonders what the negotiations would then be about.

    I don't have too many problems with the preconditions. I'm not sure about the receivership, as that goes too far.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote on last edited by
      #45

      I'm not sure about the receivership, as that goes too far.

      I can’t imagine why you might think that. It is, after all, just one those useless touchy-feely interdisciplinary social science programmes. Or would you like it to be a Bible Studies programme under the guise of interdisciplinary studies programme? Just asking.

      Elbows up!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by Jolly
        #46

        BTW, using Federal funds as a bludgeoning tool of compliance is nothing new.

        In 1979, I was attending a private college. The Feds dropped in and told the College Administration you don't have enough black students. The college replied that 13% of the student body is black and here is documentation of our efforts to recruit more... We are offering substantial scholarships, particularly to those more economically unfortunate, but they must meet entrance criteria (which wasn't onerous, just a 23 ACT and graduation in the top 25% of your class).

        And besides, we don't take any Federal funds. 😛

        Well, said the Feds, the college may not, but your students have Pell Grants and student loans, which we will be happy to terminate.
        Unless you can bring those black student percentages up to at least 20%

        So the college had to find another 100 black students, qualified or not.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Mik

          There’s no way to cut painlessly, I agree. I also believe there are taxpayer supported studies that are not worth the expense. But many if not most are. To cut them off in mid study while still proposing deficit spending seems less than due diligence.

          89th8 Offline
          89th8 Offline
          89th
          wrote on last edited by
          #47

          @Mik said in It gets personal:

          There’s no way to cut painlessly, I agree. I also believe there are taxpayer supported studies that are not worth the expense. But many if not most are. To cut them off in mid study while still proposing deficit spending seems less than due diligence.

          Yeah agreed. Lazy is a good term for it, chasing headlines is another. As you said, whether it's research grants, or federal employees, or other programs, there is good work out there, perhaps most of the time, and our country is better than the "meh, there will be blood" wrecking ball approach when a smart scalpel could be used to avoid hurting the good work that's out there.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #48

            Smart scalpel is preferred, but the political will won't be there when you need it.

            It's going to be the roast chicken method, if it's done

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Jolly

              Smart scalpel is preferred, but the political will won't be there when you need it.

              It's going to be the roast chicken method, if it's done

              89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote on last edited by
              #49

              @Jolly said in It gets personal:

              Smart scalpel is preferred, but the political will won't be there when you need it.

              How so? Don't you think an approach where Trump said something like "I'm going to deploy 10 genius analysts into each <whatever> branch and ask them to provide a full report in 6 months of what should be cut immediately and what should be sent back to congress to review appropriations". It doesn't have to take 4 years, but it also doesn't have to take 4 weeks. The latter is reckless and lazy.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by Jolly
                #50

                A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                MikM LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
                • kluursK Offline
                  kluursK Offline
                  kluurs
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #51

                  Reminds me of a contest at college where they wanted to rename the "Great Hall" into something more interesting. Someone submitted "Nixon's Tomb" - which I thought was wonderful. I was actually on the committee that would decide the name - and spoke forcefully in favor of the name change - but by the time I got done speaking, even I was convinced it wasn't such a great idea since Nixon seemed to take things personal and while it would have made the national news - not the news that would result in good tidings.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                    In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                    In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                    MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #52

                    @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                    A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                    In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                    In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                    Ah, but Macbeth was speaking of murder, not cost cutting. 😄

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Jolly

                      A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                      In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                      In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #53

                      @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                      A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                      In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                      In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                      Great. What have they actually cut?

                      The Brad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • CopperC Online
                        CopperC Online
                        Copper
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #54

                        All told, more than 30,000 federal employees were fired in recent weeks after the Trump administration directed a mass purge of probationary staff.

                        https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/03/trump-administration-taking-steps-comply-court-orders-reinstate-tens-thousands-fired-workers/403795/

                        89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                        • MikM Mik

                          @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                          A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                          In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                          In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                          Ah, but Macbeth was speaking of murder, not cost cutting. 😄

                          JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #55

                          @Mik said in It gets personal:

                          @Jolly said in It gets personal:

                          A very smart man once said, If t'were done, it is well it t'were done quickly.

                          In politics, when you've got Big MO, you gitter done. The longer something rattles around in the box, the more opposition you'll tend to have.

                          In the case of cuts, corporate or government, you cut fast and hard. Sometimes, you have to adjust the cuts later, but that's usually easier than the paralysis of analysis.

                          Ah, but Macbeth was speaking of murder, not cost cutting. 😄

                          Well, it is job death for some ...

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #56

                            A big diabetes study canceled.

                            IMG_3689.jpeg

                            Like ours, Columbia was the lead but it funds many centers, in this case over 2 dozen.

                            IMG_3690.jpeg

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              A big diabetes study canceled.

                              IMG_3689.jpeg

                              Like ours, Columbia was the lead but it funds many centers, in this case over 2 dozen.

                              IMG_3690.jpeg

                              Doctor PhibesD Offline
                              Doctor PhibesD Offline
                              Doctor Phibes
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #57

                              @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                              A big diabetes study canceled.

                              And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                              I was only joking

                              RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                              • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                A big diabetes study canceled.

                                And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                RenaudaR Offline
                                RenaudaR Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #58

                                @Doctor-Phibes said in It gets personal:

                                @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                A big diabetes study canceled.

                                And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                POTD

                                Elbows up!

                                Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                                • RenaudaR Renauda

                                  @Doctor-Phibes said in It gets personal:

                                  @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                  A big diabetes study canceled.

                                  And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                  POTD

                                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                  Doctor Phibes
                                  wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                                  #59

                                  @Renauda said in It gets personal:

                                  @Doctor-Phibes said in It gets personal:

                                  @jon-nyc said in It gets personal:

                                  A big diabetes study canceled.

                                  And yet we can still afford a new study regarding the link between fucking autism and vaccines.

                                  POTD

                                  What is the point of this? Can anybody think of a rationale? Other than buying off RFK, obviously.

                                  I was only joking

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • CopperC Copper

                                    All told, more than 30,000 federal employees were fired in recent weeks after the Trump administration directed a mass purge of probationary staff.

                                    https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/03/trump-administration-taking-steps-comply-court-orders-reinstate-tens-thousands-fired-workers/403795/

                                    89th8 Offline
                                    89th8 Offline
                                    89th
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #60

                                    @Copper said in It gets personal:

                                    All told, more than 30,000 federal employees were fired in recent weeks after the Trump administration directed a mass purge of probationary staff.

                                    https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/03/trump-administration-taking-steps-comply-court-orders-reinstate-tens-thousands-fired-workers/403795/

                                    Keep up! They have been rehired since what Trump did was not legal. Now they're getting paid to play golf! (or whatever they do on paid leave)

                                    25,000 employees... costing us $8 million per day. So much winning!

                                    https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/37080/judge-reverses-mass-firings-of-federal-workers/11

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups