Glad the free speech folks are in charge
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2024, 12:34 last edited by jon-nyc
Nope, I’m just calling you out on your hypocrisy.
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2024, 12:39 last edited by
If you equate fairness with hypocrisy, so be it.
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2024, 13:11 last edited by
Yeah, right.
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2024, 13:32 last edited by
Yeah. Right.
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2024, 14:25 last edited by
I guess it depends on your definition of fairness. Like if it includes billionaires filing expensive but frivolous lawsuits against middle class women in Iowa.
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2024, 15:08 last edited by Jolly
Normally, a person would say that's a crappy outlier poll and carry on.
But no, because of an election shot through with murkiness, bad practices and simple outright cheating, highly unusual acts become highly suspect. Get used to it. Much like Dingy Harry's disregard for long-standing Senate rules, Dems have shifted the paradigm.
THIS is the new reality. You may not like it, but you're going to live with it, and probably die with it. As will I.
If Trump has one over-reaching redeeming quality, it's as a catalyst. Maybe it's a reaction that's not for the best, but a lot of times, the end result is good. The end of overt election interference is good. The end of election cheating is good. The end of lawfare is good. The end of Justice Department persecution is good. The end of the "basement strategy" is good. The end of Sullivan will be wonderful.
You see no good, because of hate.
Well, as mama said, you've got the same pants to get glad in. On January 20th, Donald J. Trump will become the 47th POTUS.
The President of the United States and the President of Jon.
Enjoy!
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 09:45 last edited by
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 10:45 last edited by jon-nyc 7 days ago
-
wrote on 4 Feb 2025, 11:22 last edited by
(To be clear, I’m not a fan of publicizing the names of federal workers in controversial areas whether it’s Elon doing it or a twitter rando, really just pointing out Elon’s hypocrisy here)
-
wrote on 8 Feb 2025, 14:43 last edited by
-
wrote on 8 Feb 2025, 14:48 last edited by
Is anonymous synonymous with free speech?
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 19:46 last edited by
Trump's own personal polls touted his winning New York and California. Can I sue?
-
wrote on 13 Feb 2025, 15:01 last edited by
-
wrote on 13 Feb 2025, 15:19 last edited by
Free speech != free access to the white house press briefing room. I'm glad they have seats for "new press", and if they'd like to hold the AP accountable for being obstinate about the Gulf of America, ok by me. I don't mistake calling it "the Gulf of Mexico" for a principled stance. It is a child holding their breath.
-
wrote on 13 Feb 2025, 15:42 last edited by jon-nyc
The AP is an international news provider and its an international body of water. Only one country refers to it as 'Gulf of America', which is even a minority of those that touch its shores. Not to mention the rest of the world.
If Cuba hand changed the name to 'Gulf of Fidel' would AP holding out be like a child holding their breath?
-
wrote on 13 Feb 2025, 15:45 last edited by jon-nyc
When the WH spokesman says 'we're holding you accountable for speech we don't like' the first amendment is implicated.
-
When the WH spokesman says 'we're holding you accountable for speech we don't like' the first amendment is implicated.
wrote on 13 Feb 2025, 15:49 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
When the WH spokesman says 'we're holding you accountable for speech we don't like' the first amendment is implicated.
In context, obviously that accountability is limited to access to the WH briefing room, and the first amendment is not implicated unless you're motivated to squint.
-
The AP is an international news provider and its an international body of water. Only one country refers to it as 'Gulf of America', which is even a minority of those that touch its shores. Not to mention the rest of the world.
If Cuba hand changed the name to 'Gulf of Fidel' would AP holding out be like a child holding their breath?
wrote on 13 Feb 2025, 15:50 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
The AP is an international news provider and its an international body of water. Only one country refers to it as 'Gulf of America', which is even a minority of those that touch its shores. Not to mention the rest of the world.
If Cuba hand changed the name to 'Gulf of Fidel' would AP holding out be like a child holding their breath?
Fair enough, you could make a case that the AP stories are not for an American audience. The practical truth of the audience that reads these stories would probably work against that claim, but the theoretical claim could still be made.
-
wrote on 13 Feb 2025, 16:02 last edited by
I’m going with Golfo del Gringo Loco.
Has nice lyrical ring to it.
-
When the WH spokesman says 'we're holding you accountable for speech we don't like' the first amendment is implicated.
wrote on 13 Feb 2025, 16:05 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Glad the free speech folks are in charge:
When the WH spokesman says 'we're holding you accountable for speech we don't like' the first amendment is implicated.
Compelled speech... you wonder what Jordan Peterson is thinking right now.