ChatGPT

[Horace]

@George-K said in Chat GPT:

@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.

"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>

Wikipedia is demonized by ChatGPT? how so? Examples?

[George K]

@Horace said in Chat GPT:

Wikipedia is demonized by ChatGPT? how so? Examples?

I didn't say that, that was in the twitter feed.

But, I think what that poster meant to say is that Wikipedia is demonized by many for its slant, and not by ChatGPT.

[Horace]

I’m not buying that chatGPT’s bias is entirely pulled from the data. It seems to have some hard coded logic attached to certain people which, for all the efforts of the indoctrinated masses, does not exist across the web to that degree. It’s not in fact impossible to find a nice thing to say about Donald Trump.

[kluurs]

Does it write pron? That will help move it into the mainstream.

[Axtremus]

Of course there are manually programmed restrictions. ChatGPT's website tells you upfront there are certain topics that are off limits.

So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.

Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!

[Mik]

“Is our AIs learning?”

[Ivorythumper]

@Aqua-Letifer said in Chat GPT:

@Ivorythumper said in Chat GPT:

I didn't get that.

It learns….

[Nunatax]

I wonder if it could solve any of jon’s or klaus’ math riddles.

Never mind…

[jon-nyc]

@Nunatax

What do you mean ‘never mind’?

That’s the same answer I got.

[jon-nyc]

@George-K said in Chat GPT:

Does anyone take Jack Prosobiec seriously? How about twice?

[bachophile]

[George K]

@bachophile like any good radiologist, it says that "clinical correlation is required."

[Nunatax]

@jon-nyc said in Chat GPT:

@Nunatax

What do you mean ‘never mind’?

That’s the same answer I got.

It may have demonstrated having (at least basic) mathematical skills, but it failed quite miserably at solving the riddle…

[89th]

https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/10sja83/3d_printer_does_homework_chatgpt_wrote/

A 3D printer is used to control a pen to "hand write" homework, using ChatGPT content as the input. Best comment? It's ok, the teacher is going to use OCR and ChatGPT to grade it!

[jon-nyc]

@Nunatax I was joking….

[Doctor Phibes]

So for all its sophistication, it's really still failing the Turing test quite badly.

I guess a year from now it won't be, but who knows?

[Nunatax]

@jon-nyc said in Chat GPT:

@Nunatax I was joking….

I thought so, but I wasn’t 100% sure… after all, you’re not a biologist, right?

[Axtremus]

Note that ChatGPT has the intelligence to know when to back off and apologize.

[Axtremus]

https://www.reuters.com/technology/tech-giants-ai-like-bing-bard-poses-billion-dollar-search-problem-2023-02-22/

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/02/chatgpt-style-search-represents-a-10x-cost-increase-for-google-microsoft/

Articles say "ChatGPT-like search" will cost Google multiple $billions in operating cost, "10x" the cost of conventional search.

[89th]