ChatGPT
-
-
Please love yourself.
-
@Aqua-Letifer apparently Chat is better at changing its
mind when it’s wrong than humans, too -
Microsoft has been a funding OpenAI since 2019, also backing OpenAI with Azure cloud infrastructure. Now Microsoft ways it will continue to throw multiple $billions over multiple years at OpenAI and keep it running on Azure.
-
I told Chat GPT to write a sales pitch just using the url of our company website.
This is the result:
"Welcome to QEMS, your one-stop shop for all your quality management needs. We understand that maintaining and improving quality can be a daunting task, but with our state-of-the-art software and expert consulting services, we make it easy for you to achieve your quality goals.
Our software is designed to help you streamline your quality management processes and improve efficiency. With real-time data tracking and reporting, you can easily identify areas for improvement and make data-driven decisions. Our software is also fully customizable to meet the unique needs of your organization.
In addition to our software, we also offer expert consulting services to help you navigate the complex world of quality management. Our team of certified quality professionals has years of experience in various industries, and they are dedicated to helping you achieve your quality goals.
Don't let quality management hold you back from reaching your full potential. Let QEMS be your partner in quality success. Contact us today to schedule a demo of our software and see for yourself how we can help you achieve your quality goals."
I would modify the crap out of it, but it does provide a reasonable base to start with. It missed a few things and I do not like the phrase "certified quality professionals" It sounds fake to me and nowhere on our site do those words exist.
I find it to be exciting technology but then, I find most technology to be exciting. Am I scared of it? Not in the least. But then, it will not replace my job. I started into AI in the infancy stage many many years ago. I got bored with the state of the technology back then and went a different path. No regrets, but it would have been nice to see billions of dollars from Mr Gates. lol
-
It’s very similar to what you see on consulting company websites. Complete bullshit speak littered with term of the day words. Vague as can be.
In other words, spot on.
-
It’s very similar to what you see on consulting company websites. Complete bullshit speak littered with term of the day words. Vague as can be.
In other words, spot on.
It’s very similar to what you see on consulting company websites. Complete bullshit speak littered with term of the day words. Vague as can be.
In other words, spot on.
Marketing professionals were among the Golgrafrinchan people who originally populated earth in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, along with management consultants, hairdressers, and life-insurance salespeople.
The theory was that there were three kinds of people - leaders, doers and middlemen.
It's a little hard to argue with the logic of their solution.
-
"Shouldn't be taken seriously" is an interestingly perfect distillation of the concept of social exclusion, or marginalization.
But I don't know who either of those last two are, off the top of my head.
@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.
"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>
-
@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.
"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>
@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.
"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>
Wikipedia is demonized by ChatGPT? how so? Examples?
-
@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.
"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>
Wikipedia is demonized by ChatGPT? how so? Examples?
-
I’m not buying that chatGPT’s bias is entirely pulled from the data. It seems to have some hard coded logic attached to certain people which, for all the efforts of the indoctrinated masses, does not exist across the web to that degree. It’s not in fact impossible to find a nice thing to say about Donald Trump.
Education is extremely important.
-
I’m not buying that chatGPT’s bias is entirely pulled from the data. It seems to have some hard coded logic attached to certain people which, for all the efforts of the indoctrinated masses, does not exist across the web to that degree. It’s not in fact impossible to find a nice thing to say about Donald Trump.
Of course there are manually programmed restrictions. ChatGPT's website tells you upfront there are certain topics that are off limits.
So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.
Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!
-
