ChatGPT
-
"Shouldn't be taken seriously" is an interestingly perfect distillation of the concept of social exclusion, or marginalization.
But I don't know who either of those last two are, off the top of my head.
@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.
"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>
-
@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.
"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>
@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.
"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>
Wikipedia is demonized by ChatGPT? how so? Examples?
-
@Horace in the twitter thread regarding this, there's an interesting comment. Basically, Chat GPT gathers its information from the web and other similar sources. It basically regurgitates what it reads.
"This isn’t surprising considering it pulls data from the web… You can’t search for anything from history without getting some modern woke opinion story about the topic. Meanwhile Wikipedia one of the few places that atleast gives the ability to find original sources is demonized>
Wikipedia is demonized by ChatGPT? how so? Examples?
-
I’m not buying that chatGPT’s bias is entirely pulled from the data. It seems to have some hard coded logic attached to certain people which, for all the efforts of the indoctrinated masses, does not exist across the web to that degree. It’s not in fact impossible to find a nice thing to say about Donald Trump.
Education is extremely important.
-
I’m not buying that chatGPT’s bias is entirely pulled from the data. It seems to have some hard coded logic attached to certain people which, for all the efforts of the indoctrinated masses, does not exist across the web to that degree. It’s not in fact impossible to find a nice thing to say about Donald Trump.
Of course there are manually programmed restrictions. ChatGPT's website tells you upfront there are certain topics that are off limits.
So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.
Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!
-
-
-
@bachophile like any good radiologist, it says that "clinical correlation is required."
-
A 3D printer is used to control a pen to "hand write" homework, using ChatGPT content as the input. Best comment? It's ok, the teacher is going to use OCR and ChatGPT to grade it!
-
-
So for all its sophistication, it's really still failing the Turing test quite badly.
I guess a year from now it won't be, but who knows?
