ChatGPT
-
I’m not buying that chatGPT’s bias is entirely pulled from the data. It seems to have some hard coded logic attached to certain people which, for all the efforts of the indoctrinated masses, does not exist across the web to that degree. It’s not in fact impossible to find a nice thing to say about Donald Trump.
Of course there are manually programmed restrictions. ChatGPT's website tells you upfront there are certain topics that are off limits.
So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.
Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!
-
-
-
@bachophile like any good radiologist, it says that "clinical correlation is required."
-
A 3D printer is used to control a pen to "hand write" homework, using ChatGPT content as the input. Best comment? It's ok, the teacher is going to use OCR and ChatGPT to grade it!
-
-
So for all its sophistication, it's really still failing the Turing test quite badly.
I guess a year from now it won't be, but who knows?
-
Articles say "ChatGPT-like search" will cost Google multiple $billions in operating cost, "10x" the cost of conventional search. :man-shrugging:
-
Of course there are manually programmed restrictions. ChatGPT's website tells you upfront there are certain topics that are off limits.
So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.
Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!
So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.
.
Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!So, this is happening:
https://www.vice.com/en/article/epzjpn/ai-chatbot-white-supremacist-gab
…
Gab, a white supremacist forum that’s a favorite of mass shooters and organizers of the Capitol riot, and 8kun, the home of QAnon, have announced they’re launching AI engines— and they’re training them on the same content that has in the past led multiple internet companies to cut ties and take the platforms offline.
… -
ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly
“The first indicator that I was dealing with AI was that, despite the syntactic coherence of the essay, it made no sense.”
... -
ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly
“The first indicator that I was dealing with AI was that, despite the syntactic coherence of the essay, it made no sense.”
...ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly
“The first indicator that I was dealing with AI was that, despite the syntactic coherence of the essay, it made no sense.”
...Today only.
-
ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly
“The first indicator that I was dealing with AI was that, despite the syntactic coherence of the essay, it made no sense.”
...ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly
“The first indicator that I was dealing with AI was that, despite the syntactic coherence of the essay, it made no sense.”
...You don’t need to be a professor, Aqua and I compared articles several months ago and identified the AI articles. But that’s today. Look at the growth
, look at the trends. AI can’t go backwards or even stay stagnant by the very definition.
