Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Is the predictive model wrong?

Is the predictive model wrong?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
21 Posts 6 Posters 412 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    .........and they've updated the article. The change in bold.

    Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Friday that 2,935 New Yorkers have died from the coronavirus so far with 562 new deaths over the last 24 hours

    1 Reply Last reply
    • CopperC Offline
      CopperC Offline
      Copper
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Impeach him!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        The more I look into this model the less I like it. It strikes me as more of a ‘technical analysis’ than a ‘fundamental analysis’ in that it’s basically a curve fitting exercise heavily relying on the Wuhan experience.

        It seems to be predicting way too early of a peak and is overall too optimistic about our social-distancing measures.

        I would love to see the details behind the McKinsey models.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        George KG LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          The more I look into this model the less I like it. It strikes me as more of a ‘technical analysis’ than a ‘fundamental analysis’ in that it’s basically a curve fitting exercise heavily relying on the Wuhan experience.

          It seems to be predicting way too early of a peak and is overall too optimistic about our social-distancing measures.

          I would love to see the details behind the McKinsey models.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          @jon-nyc yes.

          And the simple fact that its accuracy, in historical perspective, is pretty poor.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            The more I look into this model the less I like it. It strikes me as more of a ‘technical analysis’ than a ‘fundamental analysis’ in that it’s basically a curve fitting exercise heavily relying on the Wuhan experience.

            It seems to be predicting way too early of a peak and is overall too optimistic about our social-distancing measures.

            I would love to see the details behind the McKinsey models.

            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            @jon-nyc Which model? The covid19.healthdata.org model? I’ve been calling that model crap for the opposite reason. It undervalues decisions made by the general public and overvalues decisions handed down by the government.

            The Brad

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              Yes that model. That’s not really the opposite of my view, I also think it overstates the effect of our lockdown.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                Yes that model. That’s not really the opposite of my view, I also think it overstates the effect of our lockdown.

                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                @jon-nyc do you have a link to the McKinsey models?

                The Brad

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                  #18

                  They’re not public to my knowledge.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by LuFins Dad
                      #20

                      I’d like to see the ventilator numbers. And Florida is way too early to take anything from a 1 day aberration

                      The Brad

                      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                        I’d like to see the ventilator numbers. And Florida is way too early to take anything from a 1 day aberration

                        George KG Offline
                        George KG Offline
                        George K
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        @LuFins-Dad said in Is the predictive model wrong?:

                        Florida is way too early to take anything from a 1 day aberration

                        Absolutely. We've seen 1 day dips before.

                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups