Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.0k Posts 20 Posters 99.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • bachophileB Offline
    bachophileB Offline
    bachophile
    wrote last edited by
    #1003

    Here’s the action shot. It’s an Arab village not far from my town.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #1004

      Saw that. Crazy how that car flipped around like a toy.

      Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by
        #1005

        Presented without comment.

        IMG_1229.jpeg

        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote last edited by
          #1006

          A tortured view of NATO's purpose.

          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

          Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
          • Doctor PhibesD Online
            Doctor PhibesD Online
            Doctor Phibes
            wrote last edited by
            #1007

            Trump isn't the only person who will "never forget".

            I was only joking

            1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote last edited by 89th
              #1008

              Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

              W RenaudaR 2 Replies Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #1009

                We will never forget your refusal to give us help we don’t need in the war we already won.

                Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1010

                  Hahahaha so well summarized.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • Doctor PhibesD Online
                    Doctor PhibesD Online
                    Doctor Phibes
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1011

                    If he wasn't teetotal I'd honestly be convinced he got shit-faced most afternoons.

                    I was only joking

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 89th

                      Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

                      W Offline
                      W Offline
                      Wim
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1012

                      @89th Well, Turkey is actually more Asian than European (in square km).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • 89th8 89th

                        Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

                        RenaudaR Offline
                        RenaudaR Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote last edited by Renauda
                        #1013

                        @89th said:

                        Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

                        Fairly straightforward although a unanimous decision of the member states offers flexibility:

                        Key Limitations and Scope of Article 5
                        Geographic Limitations: Per Article 6, the treaty covers territory in Europe or North America, the Mediterranean Sea, or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

                        Outside Territory & Entities: It does not automatically apply to attacks on bases or territories outside the defined geographical area, such as the Falkland Islands conflict.

                        No Automatic War Trigger: Article 5 does not mean an immediate automatic military response. Instead, each ally determines "such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area".

                        Collective Decision Making: The determination that an event qualifies as a triggering incident is made by the 32 member countries acting together via the North Atlantic Council.

                        Not for Domestic Issues: Purely domestic acts of terrorism or internal armed conflict generally do not trigger Article 5, as the incident must have an international dimension.

                        Threshold of Attacks: It requires an "armed attack" by a state actor, though recent interpretations include serious, large-scale cyberattacks or hybrid attacks.

                        Not for Non-Members: The clause does not extend to non-NATO countries, such as Ukraine, regardless of their proximity to the conflict zone.

                        Exceptions and Nuances

                        First Use Example: It was invoked for the first time by the United States following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

                        Expanded Scope: NATO leaders have clarified that Article 5 can cover attacks to, from, or within space, and hybrid actions like cyberattacks.

                        Spillover Risks: Attacks causing death or destruction across the border of a NATO ally, or causing significant harm to a member, can be interpreted as an armed attack by the council.

                        In conclusion, Trump is in way over his head and, like any banal narcissist, is looking to blame others for his ineptitude.

                        Elbows up!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          AndyD
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1014

                          He has a fascinating way of speaking, a confident contradictory rambling style. I was just trying to compose something in Trumpian style:

                          We're working hard unleashing hell on the lunatic nation. Let me be quite clear it's still an existential threat; but I feel it in my bones their military is decimated and we've won, and it's a beautiful thing, yes, a beautiful thing.

                          (🙄 I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

                          Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                          • MikM Mik

                            A tortured view of NATO's purpose.

                            Doctor PhibesD Online
                            Doctor PhibesD Online
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1015

                            @Mik said:

                            A tortured view of NATO's purpose.

                            I'm a little surprised he hasn't asked his Board of Peace to step up.

                            I was only joking

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • A AndyD

                              He has a fascinating way of speaking, a confident contradictory rambling style. I was just trying to compose something in Trumpian style:

                              We're working hard unleashing hell on the lunatic nation. Let me be quite clear it's still an existential threat; but I feel it in my bones their military is decimated and we've won, and it's a beautiful thing, yes, a beautiful thing.

                              (🙄 I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

                              Doctor PhibesD Online
                              Doctor PhibesD Online
                              Doctor Phibes
                              wrote last edited by
                              #1016

                              @AndyD said:

                              ( I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

                              He'd never hold down a CEO position for a company he didn't own rambling on like that.

                              I was only joking

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Offline
                                RenaudaR Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote last edited by
                                #1017

                                Vlad Vexler on Trump’s latest post truth meltdowns:

                                Link to video

                                Elbows up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Online
                                  jon-nycJ Online
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                                  #1018

                                  At some point even many of those against the war will see the need to carry on.

                                  BlackRock CEO Larry Fink: "If the war stops but Iran remains a threat… we could face oil above $100, even near $150 for years."

                                  Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                  1 Reply Last reply

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups