Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.0k Posts 20 Posters 99.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Away
    MikM Away
    Mik
    wrote last edited by
    #1006

    A tortured view of NATO's purpose.

    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
    • Doctor PhibesD Online
      Doctor PhibesD Online
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote last edited by
      #1007

      Trump isn't the only person who will "never forget".

      I was only joking

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote last edited by 89th
        #1008

        Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

        W RenaudaR 2 Replies Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #1009

          We will never forget your refusal to give us help we don’t need in the war we already won.

          Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote last edited by
            #1010

            Hahahaha so well summarized.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Online
              Doctor PhibesD Online
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote last edited by
              #1011

              If he wasn't teetotal I'd honestly be convinced he got shit-faced most afternoons.

              I was only joking

              1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 89th

                Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

                W Offline
                W Offline
                Wim
                wrote last edited by
                #1012

                @89th Well, Turkey is actually more Asian than European (in square km).

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 89th

                  Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote last edited by Renauda
                  #1013

                  @89th said:

                  Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

                  Fairly straightforward although a unanimous decision of the member states offers flexibility:

                  Key Limitations and Scope of Article 5
                  Geographic Limitations: Per Article 6, the treaty covers territory in Europe or North America, the Mediterranean Sea, or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

                  Outside Territory & Entities: It does not automatically apply to attacks on bases or territories outside the defined geographical area, such as the Falkland Islands conflict.

                  No Automatic War Trigger: Article 5 does not mean an immediate automatic military response. Instead, each ally determines "such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area".

                  Collective Decision Making: The determination that an event qualifies as a triggering incident is made by the 32 member countries acting together via the North Atlantic Council.

                  Not for Domestic Issues: Purely domestic acts of terrorism or internal armed conflict generally do not trigger Article 5, as the incident must have an international dimension.

                  Threshold of Attacks: It requires an "armed attack" by a state actor, though recent interpretations include serious, large-scale cyberattacks or hybrid attacks.

                  Not for Non-Members: The clause does not extend to non-NATO countries, such as Ukraine, regardless of their proximity to the conflict zone.

                  Exceptions and Nuances

                  First Use Example: It was invoked for the first time by the United States following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

                  Expanded Scope: NATO leaders have clarified that Article 5 can cover attacks to, from, or within space, and hybrid actions like cyberattacks.

                  Spillover Risks: Attacks causing death or destruction across the border of a NATO ally, or causing significant harm to a member, can be interpreted as an armed attack by the council.

                  In conclusion, Trump is in way over his head and, like any banal narcissist, is looking to blame others for his ineptitude.

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    AndyD
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1014

                    He has a fascinating way of speaking, a confident contradictory rambling style. I was just trying to compose something in Trumpian style:

                    We're working hard unleashing hell on the lunatic nation. Let me be quite clear it's still an existential threat; but I feel it in my bones their military is decimated and we've won, and it's a beautiful thing, yes, a beautiful thing.

                    (🙄 I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Mik

                      A tortured view of NATO's purpose.

                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1015

                      @Mik said:

                      A tortured view of NATO's purpose.

                      I'm a little surprised he hasn't asked his Board of Peace to step up.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • A AndyD

                        He has a fascinating way of speaking, a confident contradictory rambling style. I was just trying to compose something in Trumpian style:

                        We're working hard unleashing hell on the lunatic nation. Let me be quite clear it's still an existential threat; but I feel it in my bones their military is decimated and we've won, and it's a beautiful thing, yes, a beautiful thing.

                        (🙄 I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1016

                        @AndyD said:

                        ( I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

                        He'd never hold down a CEO position for a company he didn't own rambling on like that.

                        I was only joking

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1017

                          Vlad Vexler on Trump’s latest post truth meltdowns:

                          Link to video

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                            #1018

                            At some point even many of those against the war will see the need to carry on.

                            BlackRock CEO Larry Fink: "If the war stops but Iran remains a threat… we could face oil above $100, even near $150 for years."

                            Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                            1 Reply Last reply

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                            Register Login
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups