Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Roe & Casey overturned.

Roe & Casey overturned.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
276 Posts 18 Posters 9.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    HIPAA violation...

    https://rumble.com/v1c4vu7-aishah-hasnie-updates-on-10-year-old-abortion-story.html

    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girl
    wrote on last edited by
    #249

    @Jolly said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

    HIPAA violation...

    https://rumble.com/v1c4vu7-aishah-hasnie-updates-on-10-year-old-abortion-story.html

    *Protected Health Information (PHI):

    Any personally identifiable demographic information that can be used to identify a patient. HIPAA sets national standards for the privacy and security of PHI. HIPAA identifies 18 markers of PHI, which include:

    Name
    Address (including subdivisions smaller than state such as street address, city, county, or zip code)
    Any dates (except years) that are directly related to an individual, including birthday, date of admission or discharge, date of death, or the exact age of individuals older than 89
    Telephone number
    Fax number
    Email address
    Social Security number
    Medical record number
    Health plan beneficiary number
    Account number
    Certificate/license number
    Vehicle identifiers, serial numbers, or license plate numbers
    Device identifiers or serial numbers
    Web URLs
    IP address
    Biometric identifiers such as fingerprints or voice prints
    Full-face photos
    Any other unique identifying numbers, characteristics, or codes*

    You guys know more about this than I do, but if the age was the only thing told, then maybe no violation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #250

      I would have said "No", but apparently this wasn't her patient?

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote on last edited by
        #251

        So, the rapist is an illegal immigrant, according to the 11th paragraph of a CNN story I read about the arrest.

        Education is extremely important.

        George KG JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
        • HoraceH Horace

          So, the rapist is an illegal immigrant, according to the 11th paragraph of a CNN story I read about the arrest.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #252

          @Horace said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

          So, the rapist is an illegal immigrant, according to the 11th paragraph of a CNN story I read about the arrest.

          The important question is whether he is a white Hispanic or not.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            Shouldn't be that way.

            With the way the internet and media now work, stories are not vetted and travel through the public at the speed of light. To make a mistake is bad, but to intentionally plant a false story should be criminal.

            N Offline
            N Offline
            NobodySock
            wrote on last edited by
            #253

            @Jolly said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

            Shouldn't be that way.

            With the way the internet and media now work, stories are not vetted and travel through the public at the speed of light. To make a mistake is bad, but to intentionally plant a false story should be criminal.

            Kinda like saying an election was stolen even though you have zero evidence.

            JollyJ LarryL 2 Replies Last reply
            • N NobodySock

              @Jolly said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

              Shouldn't be that way.

              With the way the internet and media now work, stories are not vetted and travel through the public at the speed of light. To make a mistake is bad, but to intentionally plant a false story should be criminal.

              Kinda like saying an election was stolen even though you have zero evidence.

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #254

              @NobodySock said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

              @Jolly said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

              Shouldn't be that way.

              With the way the internet and media now work, stories are not vetted and travel through the public at the speed of light. To make a mistake is bad, but to intentionally plant a false story should be criminal.

              Kinda like saying an election was stolen even though you have zero evidence.

              Hard to do, when the courts won't admit what evidence that was gathered.

              Did you enjoy 2000 Mules?

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Horace

                So, the rapist is an illegal immigrant, according to the 11th paragraph of a CNN story I read about the arrest.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by
                #255

                @Horace said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

                So, the rapist is an illegal immigrant, according to the 11th paragraph of a CNN story I read about the arrest.

                Well...That means The Resident will quit talking about this and move on.

                Run away! Run away!

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #256

                  https://www.vice.com/en/article/wxn5mn/ohio-rape-abortion-child-americans-united-for-life

                  Catherine Glenn Foster, the head of Americans United for Life, had this to say in Congress:

                  “If a 10-year-old became pregnant as a result of rape and it was threatening her life, then that’s not an abortion,”

                  The nonsensical denial is really strong in this one.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • N NobodySock

                    @Jolly said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

                    Shouldn't be that way.

                    With the way the internet and media now work, stories are not vetted and travel through the public at the speed of light. To make a mistake is bad, but to intentionally plant a false story should be criminal.

                    Kinda like saying an election was stolen even though you have zero evidence.

                    LarryL Offline
                    LarryL Offline
                    Larry
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #257

                    @NobodySock said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

                    @Jolly said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

                    Shouldn't be that way.

                    With the way the internet and media now work, stories are not vetted and travel through the public at the speed of light. To make a mistake is bad, but to intentionally plant a false story should be criminal.

                    Kinda like saying an election was stolen even though you have zero evidence.

                    You mean like Hillary claimed? Twice? Like Al Gore claimed?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #258

                      AOC is unclear on the concept.

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Offline
                        HoraceH Offline
                        Horace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #259

                        It’s her emotional truth.

                        Education is extremely important.

                        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                        • HoraceH Horace

                          It’s her emotional truth.

                          George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #260

                          @Horace said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

                          It’s her emotional truth.

                          "Alternative Facts!" FTW.

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • AxtremusA Offline
                            AxtremusA Offline
                            Axtremus
                            wrote on last edited by Axtremus
                            #261

                            https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/15/indiana-doc-abortion-10-year-old-ag-cease-and-desist-00046156


                            The doctor at the center of a firestorm over abortion rights sent a cease and desist letter to Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita on Friday demanding that he stop “making false and misleading statements” about her to the press.

                            An attorney for Caitlin Bernard — the OB-GYN who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape survivor from Ohio whose case grabbed national attention this week — told Rokita that his public threat to criminally prosecute her and his suggestion that she did not report the abortion to the proper state authorities “forms the basis of an actionable defamation claim.”
                            ...


                            Argue all you want that "abortion by a 10 year old rape victim" is or should be legal in all states. The reality is already there are elected Republican leaders very much reluctant to acknowledge the legality of letting a 10 year old rape victim get an abortion, and even after one is performed, already there is a state Attorney General publicly threatening to criminally prosecute a doctor for performing the abortion for a 10 year old rape victim that you all like to claim is or should be legal in all states.

                            HoraceH JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Axtremus

                              https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/15/indiana-doc-abortion-10-year-old-ag-cease-and-desist-00046156


                              The doctor at the center of a firestorm over abortion rights sent a cease and desist letter to Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita on Friday demanding that he stop “making false and misleading statements” about her to the press.

                              An attorney for Caitlin Bernard — the OB-GYN who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape survivor from Ohio whose case grabbed national attention this week — told Rokita that his public threat to criminally prosecute her and his suggestion that she did not report the abortion to the proper state authorities “forms the basis of an actionable defamation claim.”
                              ...


                              Argue all you want that "abortion by a 10 year old rape victim" is or should be legal in all states. The reality is already there are elected Republican leaders very much reluctant to acknowledge the legality of letting a 10 year old rape victim get an abortion, and even after one is performed, already there is a state Attorney General publicly threatening to criminally prosecute a doctor for performing the abortion for a 10 year old rape victim that you all like to claim is or should be legal in all states.

                              HoraceH Offline
                              HoraceH Offline
                              Horace
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #262

                              @Axtremus said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

                              https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/15/indiana-doc-abortion-10-year-old-ag-cease-and-desist-00046156


                              The doctor at the center of a firestorm over abortion rights sent a cease and desist letter to Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita on Friday demanding that he stop “making false and misleading statements” about her to the press.

                              An attorney for Caitlin Bernard — the OB-GYN who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape survivor from Ohio whose case grabbed national attention this week — told Rokita that his public threat to criminally prosecute her and his suggestion that she did not report the abortion to the proper state authorities “forms the basis of an actionable defamation claim.”
                              ...


                              Argue all you want that "abortion by a 10 year old rape victim" is or should be legal in all states. The reality is already there are elected Republican leaders very much reluctant to acknowledge the legality of letting a 10 year old rape victim get an abortion, and even after one is performed, already there is a state Attorney General publicly threatening to criminally prosecute a doctor for performing the abortion for a 10 year old rape victim that you all like to claim is or should be legal in all states.

                              Well, that is just a reading comprehension fail on your part. There is no threat to prosecute for performing the abortion.

                              Education is extremely important.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/15/indiana-doc-abortion-10-year-old-ag-cease-and-desist-00046156


                                The doctor at the center of a firestorm over abortion rights sent a cease and desist letter to Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita on Friday demanding that he stop “making false and misleading statements” about her to the press.

                                An attorney for Caitlin Bernard — the OB-GYN who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape survivor from Ohio whose case grabbed national attention this week — told Rokita that his public threat to criminally prosecute her and his suggestion that she did not report the abortion to the proper state authorities “forms the basis of an actionable defamation claim.”
                                ...


                                Argue all you want that "abortion by a 10 year old rape victim" is or should be legal in all states. The reality is already there are elected Republican leaders very much reluctant to acknowledge the legality of letting a 10 year old rape victim get an abortion, and even after one is performed, already there is a state Attorney General publicly threatening to criminally prosecute a doctor for performing the abortion for a 10 year old rape victim that you all like to claim is or should be legal in all states.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #263

                                @Axtremus said in Roe & Casey overturned.:

                                https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/15/indiana-doc-abortion-10-year-old-ag-cease-and-desist-00046156


                                The doctor at the center of a firestorm over abortion rights sent a cease and desist letter to Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita on Friday demanding that he stop “making false and misleading statements” about her to the press.

                                An attorney for Caitlin Bernard — the OB-GYN who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape survivor from Ohio whose case grabbed national attention this week — told Rokita that his public threat to criminally prosecute her and his suggestion that she did not report the abortion to the proper state authorities “forms the basis of an actionable defamation claim.”
                                ...


                                Argue all you want that "abortion by a 10 year old rape victim" is or should be legal in all states. The reality is already there are elected Republican leaders very much reluctant to acknowledge the legality of letting a 10 year old rape victim get an abortion, and even after one is performed, already there is a state Attorney General publicly threatening to criminally prosecute a doctor for performing the abortion for a 10 year old rape victim that you all like to claim is or should be legal in all states.

                                Uh, no.

                                Get your facts straight and get back to us.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • George KG Offline
                                  George KG Offline
                                  George K
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #264

                                  This is what democracy looks like, as Dobbs intended.

                                  Kansas voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly struck down a proposed constitutional amendment that would remove language enshrining reproductive rights in their state, in a move widely seen as a victory for abortion rights activists.

                                  The proposed amendment was the first time anywhere in the U.S. that voters cast ballots on abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June.

                                  A ballot question, known as the “Value Them Both Amendment,” asked voters to decide whether the state’s Constitution should continue to protect abortion rights. The proposed amendment to the state Constitution would have removed language that guarantees reproductive rights and asked voters if they prefer to put the issue of abortion in the hands of the state’s Republican-controlled legislature — an outcome that abortion advocates said was all but certain to result in the elimination or curtailment of those rights.

                                  A “yes” vote on the measure would remove from the state Constitution the right to an abortion and hand the issue back to the state legislature. A “no” vote on the measure would make no changes, keeping abortion rights enshrined in the state Constitution.

                                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • MikM Away
                                    MikM Away
                                    Mik
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #265

                                    As it should be.

                                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • JollyJ Offline
                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      Jolly
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #266

                                      Pretty much.

                                      I think the abortion issue is going to cool off quite a bit by November.

                                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • 89th8 Offline
                                        89th8 Offline
                                        89th
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #267

                                        The language in the Kansas amendment was a bit confusing IMO, so I could see folks voting no when they meant yes, and vice versa. Still, yes this is exactly what Dobbs was about.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • MikM Away
                                          MikM Away
                                          Mik
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #268

                                          Despite all the screeching, this court may in coming years be seen to have saved the Constitution from an overbearing federal government.

                                          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups