@Jolly said in Suing Hertz:
Does that make them judgement -proof?
I get this post is a year old, but it’s worth commenting on anyway.
Had the judgement occurred before they filed, it would have been just another debt they had and the creditor would have become a partial owner of the “new”, reorganized Hertz. But they went bankrupt in May of 2020, and the judgement happened well after the reorganization was complete. So the new owners of Hertz (which were more or less the pre-bankruptcy creditors) now own the company and are in the hook for the judgement.