@Horace said in Jake Parker: Alleged Plaigarist:
Huh. I guess the potential for a "the-ghost-writer-did-it" defense is abandoned.
It's not even actionable if he never sells the book, right? Maybe alphonso played his cards too soon.
I don't know.
Where I'm at now is: Dunn showed his notes, exactly where his method of interpreting the fundamentals came from. Parker clams up, gets legal, but then never distributes the book? Then he's a lying ass dog. He provides some kind of explanation on his method of interpreting the fundamentals (notes would be helpful), okay, I'll be open to the "outrageous coincidence" defense.
A huge strike against him is that Dunn's book provides techniques to learn how to do street sketches, not cartoons. Because that's what Dunn makes. Parker's a cartoonist.