I don't think I've ever had pheasant. I have, however, known a number of pheasant pluckers.

Yes, have some more red wine. Good for you, Sister!

Every design firm should post their idea to Reddit to quickly learn whether or not something has a hidden flaw.

Like I said, Trump is so wealthy he can afford to buy/hire the cheapest.

@jolly said in No family for you: BTW, read the comments. January 6 happened, so anything the Dems do, is just hunky-dory. Tradition or Constitution be damned, Maybe not a good idea to give them ammunition then. Exact same can be applied to the BLM protests of last year.

Okay, so let's say a few doofusses (or, more formally, doofi), give or take close to a couple of hundred. Not quite a multitude to feed but a few loaves and a couple of fish probably would have sufficed.

He doesn’t seem like a criminal or a thief but then again we’re hearing his side of the story.

Goes to show everyone that Trump is so wealthy he can actually afford to buy/hire the cheapest.

I suggest tossing them in a frying pan for a few minutes before putting them in the oven. It brightens them up, both in color and taste.

Cool stuff

I will feel more comfortable with a real trial. This blast of evidence every day is a pretty funny way of adjudicating something. But of course impeachment is a political and not a legal process. So let’s not think this in legal terms. There are no rules of evidence that I can tell. It’s trebuchet loading and launching.

[image: 1613056874916-22f921acee10c1db.png] [image: 1613056874667-eb755ff1271acc32.jpg] [image: 1613056874600-ab38fd1ffeeeeca1.jpg]

@bachophile said in Could McConnell vote to convict?: All he is saying that he probably would want to have him convicted but because it’s not politically expedient then he won’t vote publicly for it. Makes perfect sense to me. So if reality were different we would have a different result. You could literally say that about anything. I do get your point but this parsing is no way to run a railroad. If you are for a secret vote just push for that.

@loki said in Don’t worry about those anti-vaxxers: Whoever owns the algorithms rules the world. Have you checked with @Jolly about that?

If people are willing to believe that spoilers on the back of their car will make a difference at 50mph, they'll believe anything. At 200mph, with a Formula 1 car weighing 1600 lbs, small changes are a lot more important. Typically, you see the laptimes increase each lap as they burn off fuel. Visibility in an F1 car is pretty awful.

@jolly said in RIP Larry Flynt: I have my doubts about Larry resting in peace... Maybe he’ll join Hef. [image: 1613048401443-55e9c40a-1374-4619-b1e0-5e5228e3600c.jpeg]

@89th said in The most important catch in Tampa: Haha Brady was hammered A tweet, apparently from Brady himself, said he was drinking avocado tequila.

Jeebus, lady, get over it.

I used Lulu. If you use it to make physical copies, you buy those copies yourself then you redistribute them, Lulu is fine for that. If you let people order copies directly from Lulu and let Lulu takes care of order fulfillment, Lulu is also fine for that. If you want to use Lulu not only to make physical copies but also to distribute copies to other book sellers on your behalf (e.g., distribute to Amazon, Barnes and Nobles, etc.), then I feel Lulu is on the expensive side in that they require you to choose some premium options to qualify your book into their distribution program. Most of its IT system is fine but I had problem with how its website deal with Chinese fonts on the cover design; I got around that by rasterizing my entire cover design then uploading it to Lulu. I don't care enough to isolate the problem and determine whether it's a website-only problem or if it extents to its printing operation. Maybe it will be perfectly find for you if you don't use any CJK font. Good luck.