I'm not a fan of opinion polls. Some countries ban them prior to elections, but that would probably be unconstitutional here.
In the UK, prior to the 2015, the polls indicated a hung parliament, so a lot of the pre-election discussions were about who would do deals with whom. It didn't happen, but it was a huge distraction from what they should have been talking about.
It's a matter of values. The policies that you care about are relatively less important to me, and the aspects of Trump that you're willing to ignore are relatively more important to me.
Good way of putting it.
And as @Aqua-Letifer and you mention, it works for both sides.
No @Jolly , quite the opposite. I’m pretty confident our legal institutions can prevent any autogolpe. My concern is when it comes down to a handful of legislators or bureaucrats as they are much more corruptible. See my first post in the thread:
@jon-nyc said in Trump roadmap to stay in the WH:
We can laugh at this but it’s far riskier than the legal challenge route.
He doesn’t need the law on his side for much of this, just corrupt legislators and bureaucrats that will subvert democracy for him. I’m afraid those won’t be hard to find.
