@george-k said in YouTube censors Senate testimony:
@copper of course.
But, if you're Plumber Joe Sixpack, are you really going to go to the gummint's site to seek this out?
Or...YouTube?
But, here we are. A private company censoring a public government hearing.
What wrong with a private company censoring a public government hearing? Isn't that part of the protection afforded by the First Amendment?
Are you taking a position that says whenever a private enterprise's platform becomes sufficiently popular, it has to become some sort of "public platform" that are subjected to additional government regulations not applicable to the less popular platforms?
If TNCR ever gets over X million registered users and Y million daily visitors, then all of a sudden TNCR have to follow additional government rules that TNCR did not have to when it had only (X-1) million registered users and (Y-1) million daily visitors?