Skip to content

General Discussion

A place to talk about whatever you want

38.2k Topics 345.9k Posts
  • "We aren't Nazis!"

    3
    3 Posts
    42 Views
    George KG
    @copper in the twitter comments, someone wants to know what the federal budget for khakis is.
  • Skyscrapers

    1
    1 Posts
    24 Views
    No one has replied
  • Puzzle time - area-perimeter match

    3
    3 Posts
    29 Views
    KlausK
    Hm, let's see. ::: It means we want all integer solutions to a*b = 2a+2b or b = 2a / (a-2) That's a hyperbola, so there can only be finitely many solutions. [image: 1642943387223-a18c1942-5caf-43a1-bc24-6e034f714d2e-image.png] I'd say it's these four number pairs. 0,0 3,6 4,4 6,3 ::: (I put this into a defunct spoiler (damn lazy forum admin should fix this); if you want to see what I wrote you can push "Quote") Yeah, seems to be pretty simple.
  • I’ll need an entire bottle of TUMS after this, but…

    14
    14 Posts
    112 Views
    MikM
  • Puzzle time - Hazards of Electronic Coin Flipping

    16
    16 Posts
    131 Views
    jon-nycJ
    SOLUTION: If you could set p twice, two flips would be enough: Set p = 1/3 and on Heads give the widget to Alice, else reset to 1/2 and use the result to decide between Bob and Charlie. Since you can only set p once, it might make sense to try to design a scheme first, then pick p to make the scheme work. For example, you could flip your coin three times and if the flips are not all the same, you could use the "different" flip to decide to whom to award the widget (e.g., "HTT" means Alice gets it). But if you get all heads or all tails, you'll have to do it again, and maybe yet again — so, it might take more than 10 flips. But now suppose we flip the coin four times. There are four ways to get one head, six to get two, four to get three: Even numbers all, so anytime you get non-uniform results you can use the flips to decide between Alice and Bob. If the coin is fair, the remaining probability — that is, the probability q = p4 + (1 - p)4 of "HHHH or TTTT" — is only 1/8, too small for Charlie. As you reduce p, however, q changes continuously and approaches 1. Thus, by the Intermediate Value Theorem, there is some p for which the probability of "HHHH or TTTT" is exactly the 1/3 you need. [The actual value of p works out to 1/2 − sqrt(sqrt(2/3)−3/4), which is about 0.24213069021. The "other root," p = 1 − 0.24213069021, also works. Since these numbers are close to 1/4 and 3/4, you could do a pretty good job with 8 flips of a fair coin; think of each pair of 50-50 flips as one flip of a p-coin, e.g., HH is interpreted as H and HT or TH or TT as T. The result is "fair" between Alice and Bob but gives the widget to Charlie with probability (1/4)4 + (3/4)4 = 0.3203125, a bit short of his just desserts.]
  • How do you start panic buying?

    4
    4 Posts
    55 Views
    JollyJ
    Just think, in a few more years they can look forward to his state visits!
  • The Kids Aren't Alright

    4
    4 Posts
    69 Views
    Doctor PhibesD
    It does really suck for the kids, and I have first hand experience of quite how much, however despite what she's writing I don't think there's necessarily an easy answer.
  • Pandemic of the Bureacracy?

    2
    2 Posts
    27 Views
    JollyJ
    They either have to redirect their party or support Republicans...
  • Who Dis?

    5
    1
    5 Posts
    42 Views
    Aqua LetiferA
    @george-k said in Who Dis?: https://comicbook.com/startrek/news/star-trek-picards-john-de-lancie-why-q-returns/ Fuck yeah. Did you know he's dyslexic? He's got to work VERY hard on his lines.
  • The Neglected Base

    1
    1 Posts
    19 Views
    No one has replied
  • Meanwhile, in Alberta...

    2
    2 Posts
    43 Views
    RenaudaR
    Yeah there’s a problem but it’s not yet showing up in food stores. At least with beef it isn’t. Second week in a row though we could not buy a whole chicken for the roaster. In any case it’s Jason Kenny’s fault. All his.
  • I don't know...

    5
    5 Posts
    42 Views
    LuFins DadL
    In all fairness, I counted 3 that were on a combination of Joe and/or the Offensive Coordinator. Speaking as a fan of the team that just retired the most sacked QB in history, you can’t be dialing up 3rd down plays in the 4th quarter with no flat or quick slant options. Especially not after already accruing 5 sacks…
  • Rigged

    1
    1 Posts
    17 Views
    No one has replied
  • No, it's not sustainable

    1
    1 Posts
    19 Views
    No one has replied
  • The Silver Bullet

    1
    1 Posts
    19 Views
    No one has replied
  • RIP, Meatloaf… I guess?

    26
    26 Posts
    246 Views
    RenaudaR
    Meatloaf jamming sometime in the 1980s with two unknown musicians: link text
  • How to Think About War in Ukraine

    9
    9 Posts
    105 Views
    RenaudaR
    @mik said in How to Think About War in Ukraine: Great article. Thanks. He makes a huge and valid point that only geopolitical considerations are at the forefront - not concern for a sovereign nation being invaded. Exactly. But that is a motif of Russian and Soviet foreign policy. Small nations that border Russia do so only at the pleasure of the Kremlin. Along with Snyder, Stephen Kotkin has repeatedly pointed this out in his presentations. Putin sees the world through a geopolitical lens that has been distorted by his years as a KGB operative and officer. He is very much influenced by the xenophobic populism that permeates Russia beyond Moscow and St. Petersburg, cities more open to western ideas. As Snyder points out, he adheres to and champions a myth not unlike many autocrats.
  • Why Wall St loves Bidens low approval rating

    10
    10 Posts
    78 Views
    LuFins DadL
    @mik said in Why Wall St loves Bidens low approval rating: Maybe not, but I do encourage you to reproduce at a greater than replenishment rate. We're right there, and if it's a good spring at work, we may consider going for one more.
  • Today's musical interlude

    4
    4 Posts
    78 Views
    JollyJ
    Original Crickett.
  • Is this hate speech?

    14
    14 Posts
    94 Views
    KlausK
    @axtremus said in Is this hate speech?: @klaus said in Is this hate speech?: There is no such thing as "hate speech", in my opinion. There's speech that is within the realm of free speech, and there's speech that is against the law. Merely hating somebody or something is not against the law. “Hate speech” as a type of speech can certainly be defined into existence. Whether a particular definition of it overlaps with illegality is a separate question. But to define "hate speech" you'd need to define "hate". Good luck with that. Any definition will eventually boil down to "the things that those in power don't want to hear".