@Horace said in AWS training: Today I had an all-day online training for Amazon Web Services. @Klaus, if you need any help with the forum and cloud storage, please ask someone else because I paid no attention whatsoever. But the guy who gave the training is an author of science fiction books. I wonder if he's familiar to anybody here. Probably not. I guess he's not hugely successful, considering his side gig as an AWS trainer. https://www.amazon.com/Warren-Hammond/e/B001IXS1N6%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share I dunno, he's got more than a few titles under his belt there. I wouldn't knock him for having a day job—almost all writers do now. Only a few unicorns live completely off of their royalties.

@Jolly said in Seattle to pay $500K for CHOP death: $500,000 ain't enough. The cops should be able to do their jobs. The mainstream did not have the cops' backs at the time. There may be a trickle of cooler heads now looking back and lamenting what happened, but only "tribal righties" at the time were coming out and saying that something should be done about that mob. The fact that the cops retreated, was all but taken as a triumph by the mainstream. Now all the tax payers are expected to pay for those mistakes. That's nice.

@Axtremus said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!: @Catseye3 said in Hay Cats! Your AOC post of the day!: Can somebody explain the connection between the two paragraphs in her message? AOC was replying to a tweet accusing the House of doing prime time hearing for the Jan. 6 Capitol riot/insurrection but not for the supposedly rampant gun violence in Democratic-run cities. AOC’s reply rebuts on the point that gun violence is actually even more rampant in Republican-run cities, and chiding the tweet sender for having involvement in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot/insurrection to the point of having to ask for Presidential pardon thereafter. In short, where the two points in AOC’s tweet may seem unrelated, they are both germane to tweet to which AOC’s tweet replies. Clear? No, you didn’t read it correctly.

@Aqua-Letifer said in Hay Cats! Your "I hate this" post of the day.: @George-K said in Hay Cats! Your "I hate this" post of the day.: https://twitter.com/cctv_idiots/status/1530981166932697096?s=20&t=Vpyjqr-omL_xlYDkcWJHjA That's exactly what our department's mandatory pizza parties are like. If you want to watch people pretending to like each other way more than they actually do, attend a work gathering.

@George-K said in "What's charging the battery right now?": @Aqua-Letifer said in "What's charging the battery right now?": Thorium, man. Thorium. That's nuclear, right? Basically, yeah. But a very different kind. There'd be a mountain of problems I'm sure but toxic waste likely wouldn't be one of them.

This is kinda a big deal on both fronts, the censorship issue AND the fact that the vaccine is failing that badly that quickly with kids. Vaxxed Tweens are more likely to get symptomatic cases than unvaxxed kids after a few months? That’s huge on multiple levels.

No shitsky?

It is not likely that all of the responders were cowards (I mean just statistically, that's unlikely), and it's not likely that the primary decision maker in the response that occurred, made his decision to save his own skin. What this facile social response of labeling them all cowards can achieve, is to implant the notion on future cops in future schools that they don't want to live the rest of their lives with that label. So it's fine, but I'm not behind the pile-on from any visceral perspective. And I'm not under the misperception that the majority of those piling on, would have acted differently than how these responders acted. With the possible exception of whichever decision maker was primarily responsible for the response. That person may have made particularly egregious decisions.

This has a bovine excremental odor. The sun does not shine on the bottom of the plane.

We hired a crazy guy about a year ago, as a lead software architect. He was fresh from involuntarily being committed to a mental hospital after a suicide attempt. He wrote an e-book about his experiences, more of a diatribe against the mental health professionals at the hospital, which is how I know. He wrote lots of mass emails after being hired about how garbage all the practices here were. At some point, he wanted to schedule some one-on-ones with various development and quality assurance leads to get on board with the systems he wanted to put in place. One of the leads, a female QA manager, just flat out refused to work with him. Soon after that, he left the job, for other opportunities. I thought maybe the male/female thing had a role in both of their attitudes, though the crazy/sane thing was probably a larger component. I had dinner with the guy once, because I thought he was amusing, and I felt bad because he was inviting everybody and I suspect not getting a lot of positive response. But I wasn't surprised to see him go.

I mentioned this in the "inexcusable" thread. Pelosi claims that they're hammering out a compromise because the Senate bill also affords protection to the clerks and staff of SCOTUS. 18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such jjudge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. Aren't clerks 'officers of the court'?

@George-K said in Good morning!: @89th said in Good morning!: Pfft I was up at 1am for two hours. You all should get an 18-month-old. Thanks, but no thanks. I had 4. Actually, I had a 5 year old, a 4 year old, a 2 year old and a newborn at the same time. Wow, I grew up as one of 5 kids. Not sure how my parents did it either. I am learning (although sometimes I forget) that all I can do to minimize the impact of having really poor sleep nearly every night (especially with our 2nd kid) is to try and avoid booze before bed so I can get better quality sleep. That, and coffee in the morning.

That was an excellent pun, indeed, but I challenge you to actually incorporate punctuation in a park b. Then you will have achieved greatness.

In truth, there have been some major things. I don't know I would say a lot of them. The Afghan withdrawl. Despite the clusterfuck that was, we are out of there. Not entirely sure Trump's withdrawl would have been a lot better. The third COVID package. My feeling is it was not needed and in the end was more harmful than helpful. The infrastructure bill. I'm not seeing much movement there yet, but maybe, just maybe, Cincinnati will get a new I75 bridge, much needed.

@Aqua-Letifer said in "No ink 4 Cops": I get the draw to silly tips like this: makes you feel like an insider, like you know things others don't. Well, screw you too, dearie.

Ain't gonna happen.

@George-K said in Webcam recommendations?: @Doctor-Phibes said in Webcam recommendations?: I use a cheap $40 thing from Nexigo, it only does 1080p, but it's fine for online chats and what-have-you, and has built-in mic's. Is the angle of the camera adjustable? Because I slouch. Yes, it swivels up and down so you can adjust the angle

@LuFins-Dad said in OK or Okay?: I've always just used "OK", but Luke texted me earlier and used "okay". This set off a debate about which is the proper usage... The real question is, did he end the phrase with "...boomer."

I guess you could say all the other brands were sold out in a Jiffy? @Aqua-Letifer amirite