@George-K said in Link?:
We've been chasing the "amyloid deposit" r
Yes, this is a very interesting puzzle, most of it goes over my head.
The guys with the big money placed most of it on amyloid research.
But there are people who say this:
Dr. Daniel Alkon, a longtime NIH neuroscientist who started a company to develop an Alzheimer’s treatment, is even more emphatic: “If it weren’t for the near-total dominance of the idea that amyloid is the only appropriate drug target,” he said, “we would be 10 or 15 years ahead of where we are now.”
https://www.statnews.com/2019/06/25/alzheimers-cabal-thwarted-progress-toward-cure/
Then there is this:
The amyloid hypothesis drama
In AD, brain cells are dying. Additionally, a protein fragment called beta amyloid is building up on the exterior of brain cells. Some believe that amyloid buildup is a primary disease mechanism—it’s killing the cells and/or interfering with the transmission of information between cells. But other researchers I’ve spoken with believe amyloid is a byproduct of the disease process with no real consequence of its own.
Other authorities propose that amyloid plaques are actually a natural protective feature for the cells intended to defend against microbes and toxins.
https://www.amazon.com/Beating-Dementia-Monster-impairment-Alzheimers-ebook/dp/B08D3HDJ4B/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=dementia+monster&sr=8-1
