Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.0k Posts 20 Posters 99.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #1009

    We will never forget your refusal to give us help we don’t need in the war we already won.

    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 Offline
      89th8 Offline
      89th
      wrote last edited by
      #1010

      Hahahaha so well summarized.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • Doctor PhibesD Online
        Doctor PhibesD Online
        Doctor Phibes
        wrote last edited by
        #1011

        If he wasn't teetotal I'd honestly be convinced he got shit-faced most afternoons.

        I was only joking

        1 Reply Last reply
        • 89th8 89th

          Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

          W Do not disturb
          W Do not disturb
          Wim
          wrote last edited by
          #1012

          @89th Well, Turkey is actually more Asian than European (in square km).

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 89th

            Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

            RenaudaR Offline
            RenaudaR Offline
            Renauda
            wrote last edited by Renauda
            #1013

            @89th said:

            Is NATO even required to act if the "attack" is from a country (i.e., Iran) responding to an attack by a NATO member (i.e., USA)? And further, isn't Article 5 limited in that attacks in Asia and Africa don't count?

            Fairly straightforward although a unanimous decision of the member states offers flexibility:

            Key Limitations and Scope of Article 5
            Geographic Limitations: Per Article 6, the treaty covers territory in Europe or North America, the Mediterranean Sea, or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

            Outside Territory & Entities: It does not automatically apply to attacks on bases or territories outside the defined geographical area, such as the Falkland Islands conflict.

            No Automatic War Trigger: Article 5 does not mean an immediate automatic military response. Instead, each ally determines "such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area".

            Collective Decision Making: The determination that an event qualifies as a triggering incident is made by the 32 member countries acting together via the North Atlantic Council.

            Not for Domestic Issues: Purely domestic acts of terrorism or internal armed conflict generally do not trigger Article 5, as the incident must have an international dimension.

            Threshold of Attacks: It requires an "armed attack" by a state actor, though recent interpretations include serious, large-scale cyberattacks or hybrid attacks.

            Not for Non-Members: The clause does not extend to non-NATO countries, such as Ukraine, regardless of their proximity to the conflict zone.

            Exceptions and Nuances

            First Use Example: It was invoked for the first time by the United States following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

            Expanded Scope: NATO leaders have clarified that Article 5 can cover attacks to, from, or within space, and hybrid actions like cyberattacks.

            Spillover Risks: Attacks causing death or destruction across the border of a NATO ally, or causing significant harm to a member, can be interpreted as an armed attack by the council.

            In conclusion, Trump is in way over his head and, like any banal narcissist, is looking to blame others for his ineptitude.

            Elbows up!

            1 Reply Last reply
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              AndyD
              wrote last edited by
              #1014

              He has a fascinating way of speaking, a confident contradictory rambling style. I was just trying to compose something in Trumpian style:

              We're working hard unleashing hell on the lunatic nation. Let me be quite clear it's still an existential threat; but I feel it in my bones their military is decimated and we've won, and it's a beautiful thing, yes, a beautiful thing.

              (🙄 I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

              Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Mik

                A tortured view of NATO's purpose.

                Doctor PhibesD Online
                Doctor PhibesD Online
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote last edited by
                #1015

                @Mik said:

                A tortured view of NATO's purpose.

                I'm a little surprised he hasn't asked his Board of Peace to step up.

                I was only joking

                1 Reply Last reply
                • A AndyD

                  He has a fascinating way of speaking, a confident contradictory rambling style. I was just trying to compose something in Trumpian style:

                  We're working hard unleashing hell on the lunatic nation. Let me be quite clear it's still an existential threat; but I feel it in my bones their military is decimated and we've won, and it's a beautiful thing, yes, a beautiful thing.

                  (🙄 I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1016

                  @AndyD said:

                  ( I used to think management speak was bollocks and he's right up there)

                  He'd never hold down a CEO position for a company he didn't own rambling on like that.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1017

                    Vlad Vexler on Trump’s latest post truth meltdowns:

                    Link to video

                    Elbows up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                      #1018

                      At some point even many of those against the war will see the need to carry on.

                      BlackRock CEO Larry Fink: "If the war stops but Iran remains a threat… we could face oil above $100, even near $150 for years."

                      Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1019

                        Nate is tracking support for the war. He says that by and large Americans don't support the war unless they're MAGA voters (notwithstanding the loss of some of the influencer population per @horace). So that 39% is probably maga+neocons for the most part.

                        Screenshot 2026-03-26 at 2.36.26 PM.png

                        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1020

                          I see this breaking news and my first thought is, how does it still exist one month in?

                          Not that I don’t trust the two militaries to prioritize targets, but still I’m surprised it didn’t rank high enough to be destroyed yet.

                          IRGC Joint Staff HQ under U.S. Israel Attack

                          Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • RenaudaR Offline
                            RenaudaR Offline
                            Renauda
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1021

                            Interesting, I would have thought it a target on day one of this.

                            Elbows up!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                              #1022

                              It could also be that they thought the Iranian Delcy Rodriguez would come from there so they spared it for some time.

                              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • RenaudaR Offline
                                RenaudaR Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote last edited by
                                #1023

                                lol

                                Elbows up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Online
                                  jon-nycJ Online
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #1024

                                  Someone on Twitter pointed out Trump started out the year talking about affordability, then with the Iraq war, made one of the few policy decisions Trump could that would simultaneously raise gas prices and mortgage rates.

                                  IMG_1237.png

                                  Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                  1 Reply Last reply

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups