Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
895 Posts 19 Posters 17.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote last edited by
    #711

    Trump's most imbecilic trade advisors, Navarro and Lutnik, each called out the fact that large tech stocks were the main reason the stock market was doing so well. This was presented as a bad thing. Taking down America's most successful public companies may not be the goal, but it is certainly an acceptable loss, to the people behind the policies. But I remain cautiously confident that Trump does not want to be known for all those great and famous American companies getting clobbered. Lutnik and Navarro don't care, but I'm guessing that Trump does. Of course, even if Trump cares, his abject insanity regarding trade policies may prevent him from doing the right things to keep those companies healthy. He still thinks IPhones can be made in America.

    Education is extremely important.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by jon-nyc
      #712

      I agree he doesn’t want to be known as the guy that destroyed the economy. I think the problem is he thinks these tariffs really will usher in a new era of American prosperity and that both the market and economic experts are just wrong.

      You were warned.

      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girlT Offline
        taiwan_girl
        wrote last edited by
        #713

        Unfortunately, even though I am not an economist, I pretty sure it is not possible to increase labor costs by 10X or so and be able to sell the product (for example iPhone) for the same or lower price. LOL

        1 Reply Last reply
        • X Offline
          X Offline
          xenon
          wrote last edited by xenon
          #714

          It’s not even particularly desirable. An iPhone sells for $1000, costs about $400 to make and about $100 of that value is driven by China.

          Would we rather have Huawei in America with $100 going to American manufacturing (just assume that’s possible) - or the current state of an American company (Apple) with $100 going to China?

          The way Trump talks, he’d take the former.

          HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
          • X xenon

            It’s not even particularly desirable. An iPhone sells for $1000, costs about $400 to make and about $100 of that value is driven by China.

            Would we rather have Huawei in America with $100 going to American manufacturing (just assume that’s possible) - or the current state of an American company (Apple) with $100 going to China?

            The way Trump talks, he’d take the former.

            HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote last edited by
            #715

            @xenon said in Trumpenomics:

            It’s not even particularly desirable.

            No, it's all an idiotic fever dream, cooked up by maybe the only two economists in the world who think tariffs cause prosperity, and the intuitions of Trump.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote last edited by
              #716

              The simple act of building the factories makes it impossible. You can reshore some critical manufacturing capabilities, but it will need some subsidizing and a lot of deregulation to get the factories up and running, and it will still require competition. While I still think American Car manufacturing is pretty piss poor, the Japanese competition did force them to get a little better…

              The Brad

              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #717

                Indeed they did. I had an 86 ford tempo in 1990, already a cheap used car by then, that almost bankrupted me with repair bills.

                You were warned.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  I agree he doesn’t want to be known as the guy that destroyed the economy. I think the problem is he thinks these tariffs really will usher in a new era of American prosperity and that both the market and economic experts are just wrong.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote last edited by
                  #718

                  @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                  I agree he doesn’t want to be known as the guy that destroyed the economy. I think the problem is he thinks these tariffs really will usher in a new era of American prosperity and that both the market and economic experts are just wrong.

                  Been saying he's channeling McKinley.

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                    The simple act of building the factories makes it impossible. You can reshore some critical manufacturing capabilities, but it will need some subsidizing and a lot of deregulation to get the factories up and running, and it will still require competition. While I still think American Car manufacturing is pretty piss poor, the Japanese competition did force them to get a little better…

                    JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote last edited by
                    #719

                    @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                    The simple act of building the factories makes it impossible. You can reshore some critical manufacturing capabilities, but it will need some subsidizing and a lot of deregulation to get the factories up and running, and it will still require competition. While I still think American Car manufacturing is pretty piss poor, the Japanese competition did force them to get a little better…

                    Trump Admin is claiming $7T investment coming to America. I'm sure that's inflated, but look at the marching orders that went to the agencies about rules that have made up out of whole cloth. Washington should soon be in a deregulation frenzy.

                    Less regulation burdens, no tariffs, a Navy ship building program, etc. Maybe the world gets the hint we're in the business for business?

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                      #720

                      They’re both fair questions.

                      You were warned.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote last edited by
                        #721

                        I don't think we're deterring students from coming here, if they're coming to study.

                        You want to play justice warrior for your pet cause, especially using illegal protests to do so or protesting for a terrorist organization? I think your time in America will be brief and rightly so.

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                        • JollyJ Jolly

                          I don't think we're deterring students from coming here, if they're coming to study.

                          You want to play justice warrior for your pet cause, especially using illegal protests to do so or protesting for a terrorist organization? I think your time in America will be brief and rightly so.

                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                          taiwan_girl
                          wrote last edited by
                          #722

                          @Jolly said in Trumpenomics:

                          I don't think we're deterring students from coming here, if they're coming to study.

                          Sure we are.

                          If you are a foreign student looking to study abroad, and you have a choice of lets say, US, UK, Australia, etc. you may give less thought to the US, regardless if you are a pure angel or not.

                          I am guess that 4 years from now, foreign students in the US will have decreased by at least 10-20%.

                          US universities like them as they pay full amount to go to school. I know of quite a few Chinese students at schools like Univ. of IL, and they are all paying list price of USD$50K per year. (They may be getting some sort of subsidy from their home country, but not from the US school).

                          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                            @Jolly said in Trumpenomics:

                            I don't think we're deterring students from coming here, if they're coming to study.

                            Sure we are.

                            If you are a foreign student looking to study abroad, and you have a choice of lets say, US, UK, Australia, etc. you may give less thought to the US, regardless if you are a pure angel or not.

                            I am guess that 4 years from now, foreign students in the US will have decreased by at least 10-20%.

                            US universities like them as they pay full amount to go to school. I know of quite a few Chinese students at schools like Univ. of IL, and they are all paying list price of USD$50K per year. (They may be getting some sort of subsidy from their home country, but not from the US school).

                            JollyJ Offline
                            JollyJ Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote last edited by
                            #723

                            @taiwan_girl said in Trumpenomics:

                            I am guess that 4 years from now, foreign students in the US will have decreased by at least 10-20%.

                            Good.

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                            • JollyJ Jolly

                              @taiwan_girl said in Trumpenomics:

                              I am guess that 4 years from now, foreign students in the US will have decreased by at least 10-20%.

                              Good.

                              AxtremusA Offline
                              AxtremusA Offline
                              Axtremus
                              wrote last edited by
                              #724

                              @Jolly said in Trumpenomics:

                              @taiwan_girl said in Trumpenomics:

                              I am guess that 4 years from now, foreign students in the US will have decreased by at least 10-20%.

                              Good.

                              Now that you think about it, Elon first came here with a student visa.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • AxtremusA Offline
                                AxtremusA Offline
                                Axtremus
                                wrote last edited by
                                #725

                                American winemakers talk tariffs:

                                https://www.npr.org/sections/planet-money/2025/04/17/g-s1-60718/tariffs-make-sour-grapes-american-winemakers

                                Will American winemakers win with tariffs? The ones we spoke with don't seem to think so.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  AndyD
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #726

                                  Trump(CF) teaching everyone his way is the best

                                  20250413_154113.jpg

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girl
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #727

                                    End of Q1 numbers. I will update as the missing ones come in, and plan on updating this every quarter. If anybody feels something else should be on here (economically), let me know. 🙂

                                    Screenshot 2025-04-18 at 4.22.40 PM.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • 89th8 Offline
                                      89th8 Offline
                                      89th
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #728

                                      Cost of gas is down, even to $1.98! Umm the national average was $3.22 on 1/20 and $3.29 as of yesterday.

                                      Cost of eggs have gone down 92%! They were $6.55 on 1/20 and $3.11 as of yesterday. Thats like 47%?

                                      What idiots does he have feeding him data, I’m guessing only sycophants have access to him.

                                      Link to video

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • 89th8 Offline
                                        89th8 Offline
                                        89th
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #729

                                        Oh and the clip ends but he starts rambling about how the federal reserve doesn’t have anyone smart there and that Powell is playing politics.

                                        What a disaster.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • AxtremusA Offline
                                          AxtremusA Offline
                                          Axtremus
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #730

                                          Link to video

                                          TL;DR version:

                                          • Delta: doesn’t want to pay tariffs on incoming Airbus aircraft; willing to delay taking delivery
                                          • Airbus: OK, we accelerate delivery to other customers eager to take delivery earlier
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups