It’s starting
-
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Just imagine how bad it would have been if Donald had performed well in the debate…
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
-
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
Where’s that from? Nate has Harris ahead in PA, WI, MI, and NV.
Yeah, he updated the models 15 minutes after I posted. I think it’s Kamala 50, Trump 47, and a 3% chance of a split?
-
That would put the electoral count in the blue.
Though I think his model assumes some latent level of redward shift over time so maybe not. When he first started posting projections favoring Trump he hinted that if the polls stay the same the model becomes more blue friendly.
-
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
That would put the electoral count in the blue.
Though I think his model assumes some latent level of redward shift over time so maybe not. When he first started posting projections favoring Trump he hinted that if the polls stay the same the model becomes more blue friendly.
PA is basically a coin toss according to the polls, and all the battlegrounds are within the
margin of error. Trump beat the margin of error two elections in a row. -
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
There's a lot of coast in Illinois, just no elites.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in It’s starting:
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
There's a lot of coast in Illinois, just no elites.
You should see Michigan.
-
@Mik said in It’s starting:
You should see Michigan.
The comparison between Michigan and its neighbour Ontario makes me question whether 'An armed society is a polite society' isn't over-stating things a little.
-
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
Have you ever visited Rhode Island?
Refusing to sleep with blood relatives when there's an R in the month doesn't make one an elite.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Trump beat the margin of error two elections in a row.
That's important to remember. Anytime I see headlines about models showing Kamala winning, I get flashbacks of the other cackling gal in 2016...
-
And Joe was between 4-7 points ahead before 2020.
-
speaking of Hillary...
On the 2.17 Bongino podcast, he talks about line-of-sight sniper threats and about the three ring Secret Service security zones. He said that it has long been known about the Iranians and their wish to assassinate a President or high-ranking, high-profile, American official. So, while he was in the protection details, they worried about this stuff all the time.
One such worry was a Hillary speaking engagement. Too much glass, too many elevated positions with line-of-sight to the podium. Then one agent had a bright idea...It was winter! The Secret Service bought every can of fake, canned snow they could get their hands on and coated every piece of glass until you couldn't see through it.
Problem solved.