It’s starting
-
Just imagine how bad it would have been if Donald had performed well in the debate…
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Just imagine how bad it would have been if Donald had performed well in the debate…
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
Where’s that from? Nate has Harris ahead in PA, WI, MI, and NV.
Yeah, he updated the models 15 minutes after I posted. I think it’s Kamala 50, Trump 47, and a 3% chance of a split?
-
That would put the electoral count in the blue.
Though I think his model assumes some latent level of redward shift over time so maybe not. When he first started posting projections favoring Trump he hinted that if the polls stay the same the model becomes more blue friendly.
-
That would put the electoral count in the blue.
Though I think his model assumes some latent level of redward shift over time so maybe not. When he first started posting projections favoring Trump he hinted that if the polls stay the same the model becomes more blue friendly.
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
That would put the electoral count in the blue.
Though I think his model assumes some latent level of redward shift over time so maybe not. When he first started posting projections favoring Trump he hinted that if the polls stay the same the model becomes more blue friendly.
PA is basically a coin toss according to the polls, and all the battlegrounds are within the
margin of error. Trump beat the margin of error two elections in a row.The Brad
-
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Just imagine how bad it would have been if Donald had performed well in the debate…
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
There's a lot of coast in Illinois, just no elites.
-
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
There's a lot of coast in Illinois, just no elites.
This post is deleted! -
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
There's a lot of coast in Illinois, just no elites.
@Doctor-Phibes said in It’s starting:
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
There's a lot of coast in Illinois, just no elites.
You should see Michigan.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in It’s starting:
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
There's a lot of coast in Illinois, just no elites.
You should see Michigan.
@Mik said in It’s starting:
You should see Michigan.
The comparison between Michigan and its neighbour Ontario makes me question whether 'An armed society is a polite society' isn't over-stating things a little.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Just imagine how bad it would have been if Donald had performed well in the debate…
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
@Jolly said in It’s starting:
With the exception of four states, the very definition of "coastal elites".
Have you ever visited Rhode Island?
Refusing to sleep with blood relatives when there's an R in the month doesn't make one an elite.
-
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
That would put the electoral count in the blue.
Though I think his model assumes some latent level of redward shift over time so maybe not. When he first started posting projections favoring Trump he hinted that if the polls stay the same the model becomes more blue friendly.
PA is basically a coin toss according to the polls, and all the battlegrounds are within the
margin of error. Trump beat the margin of error two elections in a row.@LuFins-Dad said in It’s starting:
Trump beat the margin of error two elections in a row.
That's important to remember. Anytime I see headlines about models showing Kamala winning, I get flashbacks of the other cackling gal in 2016...
-
And Joe was between 4-7 points ahead before 2020.
-
speaking of Hillary...
On the 2.17 Bongino podcast, he talks about line-of-sight sniper threats and about the three ring Secret Service security zones. He said that it has long been known about the Iranians and their wish to assassinate a President or high-ranking, high-profile, American official. So, while he was in the protection details, they worried about this stuff all the time.
One such worry was a Hillary speaking engagement. Too much glass, too many elevated positions with line-of-sight to the podium. Then one agent had a bright idea...It was winter! The Secret Service bought every can of fake, canned snow they could get their hands on and coated every piece of glass until you couldn't see through it.
Problem solved.
-
Kinda expected that.
I think you see them tighten back up, if she continues to stay in her basement.
BTW, notice the behavior of the two candidates? After the debate, Trump left for the spin room and talked awhile. Kamala-lama-ding-dong went directly to her limo and left.
