George Santos Charged
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 16:38 last edited by
Yeah, this is a little troubling. This could be abused very easily.
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 16:41 last edited by LuFins Dad 12 Jan 2023, 16:41
So Gaetz next?
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 16:41 last edited byThis post is deleted!
-
So Gaetz next?
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 17:01 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in George Santos Charged:
So Gaetz next?
On what grounds, being an a-hole?
AFAIK the ethics charges against him are questionable and there are no indictments.
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 17:31 last edited by
I don’t have the issue you guys have. The ethics committee’s work counts as due process as far as I’m concerned.
-
Republican-led push to expel George Santos fails in the House
The resolution needed a two-thirds majority to succeed, but fell well short. The final vote was 179 to 213 with 19 members voting present.
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 17:58 last edited by@Axtremus said in George Santos Charged:
Republican-led push to expel George Santos fails in the House
The resolution needed a two-thirds majority to succeed, but fell well short. The final vote was 179 to 213 with 19 members voting present.
Good.
When convicted, they can toss him.
If reprehensible behavior is the key to expulsion, have I got a couple of hate-spewing antisemites for your consideration.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in George Santos Charged:
So Gaetz next?
On what grounds, being an a-hole?
AFAIK the ethics charges against him are questionable and there are no indictments.
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 18:28 last edited by@George-K said in George Santos Charged:
@LuFins-Dad said in George Santos Charged:
So Gaetz next?
On what grounds, being an a-hole?
AFAIK the ethics charges against him are questionable and there are no indictments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution
Each House [of Congress] may determine the Rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member.
Nothing there about ethics committees, convictions, etc… Would you say Gaetz’s attacks on McConnell were disorderly? And do you think you could get enough votes?
How about Omar? Or Tlaib in the Senate? Think you could get 17 Dems in the Senate to vote for expulsion? There are currently 9 Jewish Democrat Senators… Add in Manchin, Sinema, Lurch… I bet you could find 17 members, especially since she’s attacking the sitting President with an upcoming election…
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 18:50 last edited by
Tlaib is in the House
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 19:15 last edited by
Brain fart.
-
@George-K said in George Santos Charged:
@LuFins-Dad said in George Santos Charged:
So Gaetz next?
On what grounds, being an a-hole?
AFAIK the ethics charges against him are questionable and there are no indictments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution
Each House [of Congress] may determine the Rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member.
Nothing there about ethics committees, convictions, etc… Would you say Gaetz’s attacks on McConnell were disorderly? And do you think you could get enough votes?
How about Omar? Or Tlaib in the Senate? Think you could get 17 Dems in the Senate to vote for expulsion? There are currently 9 Jewish Democrat Senators… Add in Manchin, Sinema, Lurch… I bet you could find 17 members, especially since she’s attacking the sitting President with an upcoming election…
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 19:47 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in George Santos Charged:
Nothing there about ethics committees, convictions, etc… Would you say Gaetz’s attacks on McConnell were disorderly?
I realize that. IT's their house and they make the rules.
Gaetz? Disorderly? Of course.
Lurch hasn't been out of line that I've seen, other than his attire.
Tlaib...yeah.The majority controls the committees, and I have little doubt that they will, um, suggest to their members to follow the lines that leadership should be followed.
(too lazy to look it up)
Have there been similar findings by the ethics committee in the past where members have not been expelled?
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 19:49 last edited by
It seems like Santos went above and beyond what any of these other characters did.
-
It seems like Santos went above and beyond what any of these other characters did.
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 21:00 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in George Santos Charged:
It seems like Santos went above and beyond what any of these other characters did.
It doesn’t really matter. Now that the step has been taken, it will be easier the next. When have you seen our political leaders not take a new precedent and new authority and abuse it?
-
@LuFins-Dad said in George Santos Charged:
Nothing there about ethics committees, convictions, etc… Would you say Gaetz’s attacks on McConnell were disorderly?
I realize that. IT's their house and they make the rules.
Gaetz? Disorderly? Of course.
Lurch hasn't been out of line that I've seen, other than his attire.
Tlaib...yeah.The majority controls the committees, and I have little doubt that they will, um, suggest to their members to follow the lines that leadership should be followed.
(too lazy to look it up)
Have there been similar findings by the ethics committee in the past where members have not been expelled?
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 21:07 last edited by@George-K said in George Santos Charged:
@LuFins-Dad said in George Santos Charged:
Nothing there about ethics committees, convictions, etc… Would you say Gaetz’s attacks on McConnell were disorderly?
I realize that. IT's their house and they make the rules.
Gaetz? Disorderly? Of course.
Lurch hasn't been out of line that I've seen, other than his attire.
Tlaib...yeah.The majority controls the committees, and I have little doubt that they will, um, suggest to their members to follow the lines that leadership should be followed.
(too lazy to look it up)
Have there been similar findings by the ethics committee in the past where members have not been expelled?
I just meant that I could see Lurch voting for Tlaib to be removed, but as Jon pointed out, wrong group…
-
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 23:20 last edited by
Wow, having to give Lurch props again… https://nypost.com/2023/12/01/news/sen-bob-menendez-much-more-sinister-than-george-santos-sen-john-fetterman-says-he-needs-to-go/
-
It seems like Santos went above and beyond what any of these other characters did.
wrote on 1 Dec 2023, 23:50 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in George Santos Charged:
It seems like Santos went above and beyond what any of these other characters did.
There have been only six members expelled from the House.
Three of those fought for the Confederacy.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in George Santos Charged:
It seems like Santos went above and beyond what any of these other characters did.
There have been only six members expelled from the House.
Three of those fought for the Confederacy.
wrote on 2 Dec 2023, 00:03 last edited by@Jolly said in George Santos Charged:
Three of those fought for the Confederacy.
I thought those guys had been erased from history.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in George Santos Charged:
It seems like Santos went above and beyond what any of these other characters did.
There have been only six members expelled from the House.
Three of those fought for the Confederacy.
wrote on 2 Dec 2023, 00:38 last edited by@Jolly said in George Santos Charged:
@Doctor-Phibes said in George Santos Charged:
It seems like Santos went above and beyond what any of these other characters did.
There have been only six members expelled from the House.
Three of those fought for the Confederacy.
Well I do think the system of removing the party whip is much better, but it seems like this had cross party support
-
wrote on 2 Dec 2023, 01:01 last edited by
-
wrote on 2 Dec 2023, 01:09 last edited by
His speech is markedly improved
-
His speech is markedly improved
wrote on 2 Dec 2023, 01:14 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in George Santos Charged:
His speech is markedly improved
Remarkable, isn't it? He's coherent, pleasant-ish.
Now all he needs is a good-fitting suit.