Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak

In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
171 Posts 20 Posters 6.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Loki

    @jon-nyc said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

    I’m not ‘calling the shots’ I’m thinking out loud.

    Why is all of this a ‘who’s up, who's down’ question for you? Don’t you have any native curiosity in the underlying topic?

    Ok

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Loki
    wrote on last edited by
    #74

    Biden has a plan to open the country. Your Easter egg hunt is to go find it. It’s pretty much a re-summary of what’s out there but he senses staying at home is not the plan.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      Yeah I caught that. He’s been a failure in every conceivable respect.

      Aqua LetiferA Offline
      Aqua LetiferA Offline
      Aqua Letifer
      wrote on last edited by
      #75

      @jon-nyc said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

      Yeah I caught that. He’s been a failure in every conceivable respect.

      What's the counter-argument? What has he personally done, rather than play his very bizarre form of misinformed cheerleader?

      Please love yourself.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #76

        It wouldn’t be my plan either. I bet his plan looks a lot like what I’ve been talking about.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • L Loki

          The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

          Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Loki
          wrote on last edited by
          #77

          @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

          The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

          Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

          The latest effective reproduction estimate:

          US 1.04
          NY. .99
          FL. .91
          LA. .78

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
            #78

            God I hope its true. Have you found anything describing their methodology? It seems to be a simple calculation based on either case or death data. The only data source they list is the main page of JH's GitHub.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • L Loki

              Vaccine ready by September?

              https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-11/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-in-six-months-times

              80% confident

              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #79

              @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

              Vaccine ready by September?

              https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-11/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-in-six-months-times

              80% confident

              My understanding is the main constraint is proving efficacy and safety. I beat on the FDA as much as anyone for their Type1/Type2 error imbalance, but clearly in this case safety is of utmost importance since literally billions of people will take this vaccine.

              I don't have any experience with the MHRA but I doubt the FDA will green light in September.

              Maybe the scientist's definition of 'ready' is different than the pharmacists?

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              ? 1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                #80

                FWIW we have more than one candidate ahead of this, already in trials.

                I think the first person ever given a Covid vaccine got it almost month ago

                eta: yep, March 16th

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                  Vaccine ready by September?

                  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-11/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-in-six-months-times

                  80% confident

                  My understanding is the main constraint is proving efficacy and safety. I beat on the FDA as much as anyone for their Type1/Type2 error imbalance, but clearly in this case safety is of utmost importance since literally billions of people will take this vaccine.

                  I don't have any experience with the MHRA but I doubt the FDA will green light in September.

                  Maybe the scientist's definition of 'ready' is different than the pharmacists?

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  A Former User
                  wrote on last edited by A Former User
                  #81
                  This post is deleted!
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #82

                    What is scary lately is I have seen a lot more FB crap criticizing Fauci anfd Ohio's Acton and DeWine for being wrong with the models,calling these fine folks frauds.

                    I hope this virus blows away like a fart in the wind as temperatures rise, but I would not count on it. It seems quite robust.

                    The federal government can declare whatever they want reopened, but I know an awful lot of people who want no part of it. It would be a sure way to lose reelection for Trump.

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    • CopperC Offline
                      CopperC Offline
                      Copper
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #83

                      The number of people who want to go out will grow between now and November.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Mik

                        What is scary lately is I have seen a lot more FB crap criticizing Fauci anfd Ohio's Acton and DeWine for being wrong with the models,calling these fine folks frauds.

                        I hope this virus blows away like a fart in the wind as temperatures rise, but I would not count on it. It seems quite robust.

                        The federal government can declare whatever they want reopened, but I know an awful lot of people who want no part of it. It would be a sure way to lose reelection for Trump.

                        JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #84

                        @Mik said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                        What is scary lately is I have seen a lot more FB crap criticizing Fauci anfd Ohio's Acton and DeWine for being wrong with the models,calling these fine folks frauds.

                        I hope this virus blows away like a fart in the wind as temperatures rise, but I would not count on it. It seems quite robust.

                        The federal government can declare whatever they want reopened, but I know an awful lot of people who want no part of it. It would be a sure way to lose reelection for Trump.

                        Fauci did himself no favors this weekend. The comments he made viewed one way is a no-brainer...If we had locked down the country earlier, the disease would not have spread as quickly. OTOH, in these hyperpolitical times, it was a comment that should have not been made.

                        As for vaccines...Beware of people who promise you the moon, if you'll just throw money at them. Also keep in mind what hoops any vaccine will have to jump through to prove safety and effectiveness to the FDA...Even the new FDA. A vaccine might be ready, and may be very promising, but not ready to inoculate people.

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
                        • JollyJ Jolly

                          @Mik said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                          What is scary lately is I have seen a lot more FB crap criticizing Fauci anfd Ohio's Acton and DeWine for being wrong with the models,calling these fine folks frauds.

                          I hope this virus blows away like a fart in the wind as temperatures rise, but I would not count on it. It seems quite robust.

                          The federal government can declare whatever they want reopened, but I know an awful lot of people who want no part of it. It would be a sure way to lose reelection for Trump.

                          Fauci did himself no favors this weekend. The comments he made viewed one way is a no-brainer...If we had locked down the country earlier, the disease would not have spread as quickly. OTOH, in these hyperpolitical times, it was a comment that should have not been made.

                          As for vaccines...Beware of people who promise you the moon, if you'll just throw money at them. Also keep in mind what hoops any vaccine will have to jump through to prove safety and effectiveness to the FDA...Even the new FDA. A vaccine might be ready, and may be very promising, but not ready to inoculate people.

                          AxtremusA Offline
                          AxtremusA Offline
                          Axtremus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #85

                          @Jolly said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                          Fauci did himself no favors this weekend. The comments he made viewed one way is a no-brainer...If we had locked down the country earlier, the disease would not have spread as quickly. OTOH, in these hyperpolitical times, it was a comment that should have not been made.

                          And Trump made things worse by retweeting a #FireFauci tweet.

                          Now you want a scientist to guard his comments like a politician and you give a politician unlimited free passes for making idiotic comments publicly? What’s wrong with you?

                          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #86

                            @wtg , Loki

                            So she hasn’t really gotten going yet and is looking for funding? Its kind of a weird piece. Horribly reported.

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            ? 1 Reply Last reply
                            • MikM Offline
                              MikM Offline
                              Mik
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #87

                              Still, Jolly - it would be a really, really bad move to fire him. It would give more ammunition to those who say he doesn't listen to the scientists and would shake up an already scared population. This is a situation where a steady hand is needed, not management by chaos.

                              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                @Jolly said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                Fauci did himself no favors this weekend. The comments he made viewed one way is a no-brainer...If we had locked down the country earlier, the disease would not have spread as quickly. OTOH, in these hyperpolitical times, it was a comment that should have not been made.

                                And Trump made things worse by retweeting a #FireFauci tweet.

                                Now you want a scientist to guard his comments like a politician and you give a politician unlimited free passes for making idiotic comments publicly? What’s wrong with you?

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #88

                                @Axtremus said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                @Jolly said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                Fauci did himself no favors this weekend. The comments he made viewed one way is a no-brainer...If we had locked down the country earlier, the disease would not have spread as quickly. OTOH, in these hyperpolitical times, it was a comment that should have not been made.

                                And Trump made things worse by retweeting a #FireFauci tweet.

                                Now you want a scientist to guard his comments like a politician and you give a politician unlimited free passes for making idiotic comments publicly? What’s wrong with you?

                                As usual, you are late to the party. Fauci is a doc, but he's as much a politician as Rand Paul or Bill Cassidy. It's evident by things he has said in the past, but the primary evidence is the job he has held for quite some time.

                                You simply do not get to, or function at that level without a pretty good knowledge of politics.

                                Trump does hit the Twitter button much too quickly at times. But I don't care who the President is, nobody goes off the reservation at a time like this, especially in hyper-partisan times, without a major ass-chewing.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • markM Offline
                                  markM Offline
                                  mark
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #89

                                  yeah, because politics is so much more important than providing accurate information.

                                  GMAFB.

                                  JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                    @wtg , Loki

                                    So she hasn’t really gotten going yet and is looking for funding? Its kind of a weird piece. Horribly reported.

                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    A Former User
                                    wrote on last edited by A Former User
                                    #90
                                    This post is deleted!
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • MikM Mik

                                      Still, Jolly - it would be a really, really bad move to fire him. It would give more ammunition to those who say he doesn't listen to the scientists and would shake up an already scared population. This is a situation where a steady hand is needed, not management by chaos.

                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      JollyJ Offline
                                      Jolly
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #91

                                      @Mik said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                      Still, Jolly - it would be a really, really bad move to fire him. It would give more ammunition to those who say he doesn't listen to the scientists and would shake up an already scared population. This is a situation where a steady hand is needed, not management by chaos.

                                      He's not going to fire him, but I think you'll see Fauci backtrack at today's briefing.

                                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                      MikM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • markM mark

                                        yeah, because politics is so much more important than providing accurate information.

                                        GMAFB.

                                        JollyJ Offline
                                        JollyJ Offline
                                        Jolly
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #92

                                        @mark said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                        yeah, because politics is so much more important than providing accurate information.

                                        GMAFB.

                                        Your ignorance is either feigned or you are extremely naive. I don't think you are either.

                                        Any thinking person knows that to effectively govern in times like these, you cannot have hugely mixed messages to the public. These things are hammered out behind closed doors.

                                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                        Aqua LetiferA MikM 2 Replies Last reply
                                        • JollyJ Jolly

                                          @mark said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                          yeah, because politics is so much more important than providing accurate information.

                                          GMAFB.

                                          Your ignorance is either feigned or you are extremely naive. I don't think you are either.

                                          Any thinking person knows that to effectively govern in times like these, you cannot have hugely mixed messages to the public. These things are hammered out behind closed doors.

                                          Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                          Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                          Aqua Letifer
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #93

                                          @Jolly said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                          Any thinking person knows that to effectively govern in times like these, you cannot have hugely mixed messages to the public. These things are hammered out behind closed doors.

                                          Both the media and the current administration have been nothing but mixed messages, from January to March.

                                          Please love yourself.

                                          JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups