Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak

In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
171 Posts 20 Posters 5.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
    #62

    Jolly is missing the point. It’s not that I (or Mik, or mark, or Aqua, if I may dare to speak for them), don’t want people to return to work. It’s just that we want an effective test and trace regimen in place when we do so.

    It’s possible to end the economic catastrophe without a huge secondary (and probably more) waves.

    I just don’t see enough will to do it.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    markM JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      Jolly is missing the point. It’s not that I (or Mik, or mark, or Aqua, if I may dare to speak for them), don’t want people to return to work. It’s just that we want an effective test and trace regimen in place when we do so.

      It’s possible to end the economic catastrophe without a huge secondary (and probably more) waves.

      I just don’t see enough will to do it.

      markM Offline
      markM Offline
      mark
      wrote on last edited by
      #63

      @jon-nyc 👍

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        Jolly is missing the point. It’s not that I (or Mik, or mark, or Aqua, if I may dare to speak for them), don’t want people to return to work. It’s just that we want an effective test and trace regimen in place when we do so.

        It’s possible to end the economic catastrophe without a huge secondary (and probably more) waves.

        I just don’t see enough will to do it.

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by Jolly
        #64

        @jon-nyc said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

        Jolly is missing the point. It’s not that I (or Mik, or mark, or Aqua, if I may dare to speak for them), don’t want people to return to work. It’s just that we want an effective test and trace regimen in place when we do so.

        It’s possible to end the economic catastrophe without a huge secondary (and probably more) waves.

        I just don’t see enough will to do it.

        That's a wonderful sentiment, but it may not be possible, either through an inability to test at the necessary level or Americans not allowing themselves to be traced. I know people who put their cellphones in a cooking pot as soon as they get in the car, not taking it out until they get back home.

        So, what do we do?

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • Aqua LetiferA Offline
          Aqua LetiferA Offline
          Aqua Letifer
          wrote on last edited by
          #65

          There have got to be safety protocols, massive testing, and contact tracing in place. Even if that takes another month, in my book that would be worth it. You want a line in the sand, there you go, that's mine. I like the Ohio plan.

          I think what we don't do, because it would be absolute worst thing possible to do, would be to flip the switch and everyone returns to normal life starting Monday.

          Please love yourself.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • L Offline
            L Offline
            Loki
            wrote on last edited by
            #66

            The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

            Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

            LuFins DadL George KG L 3 Replies Last reply
            • CopperC Offline
              CopperC Offline
              Copper
              wrote on last edited by
              #67

              A lot of construction workers never left here. There are several homes being built in this neighborhood.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #68

                Loki, where are you getting these R estimates?

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • L Loki

                  The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

                  Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #69

                  @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                  The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

                  Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

                  Florida’s numbers started declining 2 weeks ago, which is a result of exposures 2 weeks before that. So what happened in Florida around March 15th to account for the drop?

                  The Brad

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                    @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                    The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

                    Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

                    Florida’s numbers started declining 2 weeks ago, which is a result of exposures 2 weeks before that. So what happened in Florida around March 15th to account for the drop?

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Loki
                    wrote on last edited by Loki
                    #70

                    https://public.tableau.com/profile/deloitte.visual.analytics#!/vizhome/DeloitteCOVID-19EconomicRecoveryDashboard/DeloitteCOVID-19Analysis

                    https://demo.spotfire.cloud.tibco.com/spotfire/wp/analysis?file=/Public/COVID19 Insights&waid=4KLSjcxKzUyYsMlDMHJjs-0615374778ew3b&wavid=0&options=3-0

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    • L Loki

                      https://public.tableau.com/profile/deloitte.visual.analytics#!/vizhome/DeloitteCOVID-19EconomicRecoveryDashboard/DeloitteCOVID-19Analysis

                      https://demo.spotfire.cloud.tibco.com/spotfire/wp/analysis?file=/Public/COVID19 Insights&waid=4KLSjcxKzUyYsMlDMHJjs-0615374778ew3b&wavid=0&options=3-0

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Loki
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #71

                      Vaccine ready by September?

                      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-11/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-in-six-months-times

                      80% confident

                      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      • L Loki

                        The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

                        Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

                        George KG Offline
                        George KG Offline
                        George K
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #72

                        @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                        The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

                        Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

                        de Blasio wasn't much better:

                        https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/how-bill-de-blasio-failed-new-york-city/609379/

                        On WYNC on Friday, he said researchers had only discovered “in the last 48 hours” that asymptomatic people can spread the disease. If Trump made the same preposterous claim, there would be howling calls for impeachment, renewed questions about his state of mind. Public-health professionals have known for months how the coronavirus spreads and who can do the spreading. If de Blasio didn't know, the fault is fully his own.

                        That would have been April 3.

                        When did this become common knowledge?

                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #73

                          Yeah I caught that. He’s been a failure in every conceivable respect.

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                          • L Loki

                            @jon-nyc said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                            I’m not ‘calling the shots’ I’m thinking out loud.

                            Why is all of this a ‘who’s up, who's down’ question for you? Don’t you have any native curiosity in the underlying topic?

                            Ok

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Loki
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #74

                            Biden has a plan to open the country. Your Easter egg hunt is to go find it. It’s pretty much a re-summary of what’s out there but he senses staying at home is not the plan.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              Yeah I caught that. He’s been a failure in every conceivable respect.

                              Aqua LetiferA Offline
                              Aqua LetiferA Offline
                              Aqua Letifer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #75

                              @jon-nyc said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                              Yeah I caught that. He’s been a failure in every conceivable respect.

                              What's the counter-argument? What has he personally done, rather than play his very bizarre form of misinformed cheerleader?

                              Please love yourself.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #76

                                It wouldn’t be my plan either. I bet his plan looks a lot like what I’ve been talking about.

                                Only non-witches get due process.

                                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • L Loki

                                  The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

                                  Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Loki
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #77

                                  @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                  The effective reproduction number in the US today is 1.07 and NY 1.05

                                  Remember Florida and the Governor... big big news a week ago? Florida is .92. Since Florida is now out of the news can anyone account for that?

                                  The latest effective reproduction estimate:

                                  US 1.04
                                  NY. .99
                                  FL. .91
                                  LA. .78

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                    #78

                                    God I hope its true. Have you found anything describing their methodology? It seems to be a simple calculation based on either case or death data. The only data source they list is the main page of JH's GitHub.

                                    Only non-witches get due process.

                                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • L Loki

                                      Vaccine ready by September?

                                      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-11/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-in-six-months-times

                                      80% confident

                                      jon-nycJ Online
                                      jon-nycJ Online
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #79

                                      @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                      Vaccine ready by September?

                                      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-11/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-in-six-months-times

                                      80% confident

                                      My understanding is the main constraint is proving efficacy and safety. I beat on the FDA as much as anyone for their Type1/Type2 error imbalance, but clearly in this case safety is of utmost importance since literally billions of people will take this vaccine.

                                      I don't have any experience with the MHRA but I doubt the FDA will green light in September.

                                      Maybe the scientist's definition of 'ready' is different than the pharmacists?

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Online
                                        jon-nycJ Online
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                        #80

                                        FWIW we have more than one candidate ahead of this, already in trials.

                                        I think the first person ever given a Covid vaccine got it almost month ago

                                        eta: yep, March 16th

                                        Only non-witches get due process.

                                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                          @Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:

                                          Vaccine ready by September?

                                          https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-11/coronavirus-vaccine-could-be-ready-in-six-months-times

                                          80% confident

                                          My understanding is the main constraint is proving efficacy and safety. I beat on the FDA as much as anyone for their Type1/Type2 error imbalance, but clearly in this case safety is of utmost importance since literally billions of people will take this vaccine.

                                          I don't have any experience with the MHRA but I doubt the FDA will green light in September.

                                          Maybe the scientist's definition of 'ready' is different than the pharmacists?

                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          A Former User
                                          wrote on last edited by A Former User
                                          #81
                                          This post is deleted!
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups