Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. ChatGPT

ChatGPT

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
144 Posts 22 Posters 5.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kluursK Offline
    kluursK Offline
    kluurs
    wrote on last edited by
    #48

    Does it write pron? That will help move it into the mainstream.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      I’m not buying that chatGPT’s bias is entirely pulled from the data. It seems to have some hard coded logic attached to certain people which, for all the efforts of the indoctrinated masses, does not exist across the web to that degree. It’s not in fact impossible to find a nice thing to say about Donald Trump.

      AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote on last edited by
      #49

      Of course there are manually programmed restrictions. ChatGPT's website tells you upfront there are certain topics that are off limits.

      So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.

      Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!

      AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote on last edited by
        #50

        “Is our AIs learning?”

        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

        1 Reply Last reply
        • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

          @Ivorythumper said in Chat GPT:

          E96DA598-36A4-4D88-A85F-A72839D02754.jpeg

          I didn't get that.

          EEEAB20E-5B92-4818-B3BC-3004133CC186.jpeg

          IvorythumperI Offline
          IvorythumperI Offline
          Ivorythumper
          wrote on last edited by
          #51

          @Aqua-Letifer said in Chat GPT:

          @Ivorythumper said in Chat GPT:

          E96DA598-36A4-4D88-A85F-A72839D02754.jpeg

          I didn't get that.

          EEEAB20E-5B92-4818-B3BC-3004133CC186.jpeg

          It learns….

          1 Reply Last reply
          • NunataxN Offline
            NunataxN Offline
            Nunatax
            wrote on last edited by
            #52

            I wonder if it could solve any of jon’s or klaus’ math riddles.

            1F763218-2CA5-4588-AC89-ACFF1751384C.png

            Never mind…

            jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • NunataxN Nunatax

              I wonder if it could solve any of jon’s or klaus’ math riddles.

              1F763218-2CA5-4588-AC89-ACFF1751384C.png

              Never mind…

              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #53

              @Nunatax

              What do you mean ‘never mind’?

              That’s the same answer I got.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              NunataxN 1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG George K

                image.jpeg

                image.jpeg

                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #54

                @George-K said in Chat GPT:

                image.jpeg

                image.jpeg

                Does anyone take Jack Prosobiec seriously? How about twice?

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • bachophileB Offline
                  bachophileB Offline
                  bachophile
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #55

                  George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                  • bachophileB bachophile

                    George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #56

                    @bachophile like any good radiologist, it says that "clinical correlation is required."

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      @Nunatax

                      What do you mean ‘never mind’?

                      That’s the same answer I got.

                      NunataxN Offline
                      NunataxN Offline
                      Nunatax
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #57

                      @jon-nyc said in Chat GPT:

                      @Nunatax

                      What do you mean ‘never mind’?

                      That’s the same answer I got.

                      It may have demonstrated having (at least basic) mathematical skills, but it failed quite miserably at solving the riddle…

                      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      • 89th8 Offline
                        89th8 Offline
                        89th
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #58

                        https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/10sja83/3d_printer_does_homework_chatgpt_wrote/

                        A 3D printer is used to control a pen to "hand write" homework, using ChatGPT content as the input. Best comment? It's ok, the teacher is going to use OCR and ChatGPT to grade it!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • NunataxN Nunatax

                          @jon-nyc said in Chat GPT:

                          @Nunatax

                          What do you mean ‘never mind’?

                          That’s the same answer I got.

                          It may have demonstrated having (at least basic) mathematical skills, but it failed quite miserably at solving the riddle…

                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #59

                          @Nunatax I was joking….

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          NunataxN 1 Reply Last reply
                          • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #60

                            So for all its sophistication, it's really still failing the Turing test quite badly.

                            I guess a year from now it won't be, but who knows?

                            I was only joking

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              @Nunatax I was joking….

                              NunataxN Offline
                              NunataxN Offline
                              Nunatax
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #61

                              @jon-nyc said in Chat GPT:

                              @Nunatax I was joking….

                              I thought so, but I wasn’t 100% sure… after all, you’re not a biologist, right? 😄

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • AxtremusA Offline
                                AxtremusA Offline
                                Axtremus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #62

                                0A08B7B6-BFB3-406C-9580-6585F536D6B8.jpeg

                                Note that ChatGPT has the intelligence to know when to back off and apologize.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • AxtremusA Offline
                                  AxtremusA Offline
                                  Axtremus
                                  wrote on last edited by Axtremus
                                  #63

                                  https://www.reuters.com/technology/tech-giants-ai-like-bing-bard-poses-billion-dollar-search-problem-2023-02-22/

                                  https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/02/chatgpt-style-search-represents-a-10x-cost-increase-for-google-microsoft/

                                  Articles say "ChatGPT-like search" will cost Google multiple $billions in operating cost, "10x" the cost of conventional search. :man-shrugging:

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • 89th8 Offline
                                    89th8 Offline
                                    89th
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #64

                                    24b0e3b8-54e9-4a25-b904-22f35f1fe1ef-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                      Of course there are manually programmed restrictions. ChatGPT's website tells you upfront there are certain topics that are off limits.

                                      So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.

                                      Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!

                                      AxtremusA Offline
                                      AxtremusA Offline
                                      Axtremus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #65

                                      @Axtremus said in Chat GPT:

                                      So what if ChatGPT and its maker OpenAI have ideological biases? They are non-governmental entities not obligated to respect your First Amendment rights.
                                      .
                                      Here's an idea: take GPT-3 and train it with only contemporary American Conservative-leaning data, program in some hard restrictions about topics that contemporary American Conservatives would rather not talk about, and you can make yourself a contemporary American Conservative-leaning chat bot. It's like Conservatopedia as a response to Wikipedia, but with AI!

                                      So, this is happening:
                                      https://www.vice.com/en/article/epzjpn/ai-chatbot-white-supremacist-gab
                                      …
                                      Gab, a white supremacist forum that’s a favorite of mass shooters and organizers of the Capitol riot, and 8kun, the home of QAnon, have announced they’re launching AI engines— and they’re training them on the same content that has in the past led multiple internet companies to cut ties and take the platforms offline.
                                      …

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • AxtremusA Offline
                                        AxtremusA Offline
                                        Axtremus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #66

                                        https://www.vice.com/en/article/epzjew/chatgpt-is-so-bad-at-essays-that-professors-can-spot-it-instantly

                                        ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly
                                        “The first indicator that I was dealing with AI was that, despite the syntactic coherence of the essay, it made no sense.”
                                        ...

                                        Aqua LetiferA LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
                                        • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                          https://www.vice.com/en/article/epzjew/chatgpt-is-so-bad-at-essays-that-professors-can-spot-it-instantly

                                          ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly
                                          “The first indicator that I was dealing with AI was that, despite the syntactic coherence of the essay, it made no sense.”
                                          ...

                                          Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                          Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                          Aqua Letifer
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #67

                                          @Axtremus said in Chat GPT:

                                          https://www.vice.com/en/article/epzjew/chatgpt-is-so-bad-at-essays-that-professors-can-spot-it-instantly

                                          ChatGPT Is So Bad at Essays That Professors Can Spot It Instantly
                                          “The first indicator that I was dealing with AI was that, despite the syntactic coherence of the essay, it made no sense.”
                                          ...

                                          Today only.

                                          Please love yourself.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups