Trump vs. DeSantis
-
@Mik said in Trump vs. DeSantis:
It’s pretty universal here too. I absolutely will not vote for him in the primaries. I’d have to see who the Dems offer up in the general.
If it was Trump vs Manchin?
-
@Mik said in Trump vs. DeSantis:
It’s pretty universal here too. I absolutely will not vote for him in the primaries. I’d have to see who the Dems offer up in the general.
I would freaking love seeing Trump getting beaten in the Primaries. And I have this vague feeling that I’m not alone.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump vs. DeSantis:
I would freaking love seeing Trump getting beaten in the Primaries. And I have this vague feeling that I’m not alone.
You're not.
-
@Renauda said in Trump vs. DeSantis:
@Jolly said in Trump vs. DeSantis:
Preemptive strike.
No, it’s just another one of his narcissistic brain farts. This time though, he shat himself.
He will wear it.
For most people, that would not be an enjoyable experience. For Trump, I’m not so sure.
-
Like most unpotty trained toddlers, he is mirthfully oblivious to the soil in his nappy.
-
DeSantis supporters were chanting “Two More Years!” at his rally tonight.
-
@xenon said in Trump vs. DeSantis:
The answer could not be more clear for Reps. Do it the DeSantis way.
You may be overestimating the Reps’ clarity of perception. What’s clear to you may not be clear to the Reps. You’d figure things would be “clear” to most people after a string of 59 failed attempts to convince the courts of voting fraud in the 2020 election, but not the Reps!
-
@Axtremus said in Trump vs. DeSantis:
@xenon said in Trump vs. DeSantis:
The answer could not be more clear for Reps. Do it the DeSantis way.
You may be overestimating the Reps’ clarity of perception. What’s clear to you may not be clear to the Reps. You’d figure things would be “clear” to most people after a string of 59 failed attempts to convince the courts of voting fraud in the 2020 election, but not the Reps!
I think what some of them lack is not so much clarity, as intestinal fortitude. They really need to stand up to Trump, and forget about angering his base
-
Sean Spicer started laying the ground cover for Trump… The candidates that failed did so on their own. He pointed to an extreme difference in how much fundraising they did and how much of their own war chest they spent vs. relying on SuperPacs… According to him, successful campaigns like Johnson in WI and Budd in NC did a lot of fundraising and didn’t ask for or get much support from SuperPacs. Campaigns like Oz in PA and Masters in AZ did not put anywhere near the amount of work that was expected and even relied on SuperPacs to coordinate their ground game…
Don’t know if it’s true or not, but it sounds plausible. It also sounds like an attempt to give his old boss a path forward…