In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak
-
@Loki said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:
@jon-nyc said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:
@Horace said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:
Getting below 1 is a meaningless threshold when you employ temporary and unsustainable measures to get there.
Temporary is a feature and if you get substantially below 1 there's no need to sustain because new cases will be manageable through contact tracing.
Well that’s interesting. I want to know how contact tracing will work in the US. No way I predict an Apple/ google initiative will get anywhere near the opt in necessary to make viable. That’s like saying hydro chloroquine will work.
Yes it will be interesting to watch America do contact tracing in the next couple months.
wrote on 3 May 2020, 01:13 last edited by jon-nyc 5 Mar 2020, 01:13@Horace said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:
Yes it will be interesting to watch America do contact tracing in the next couple months.
I don't think it will. Too many Coppers and Candices here. We'll get the pandemic we deserve.
-
wrote on 3 May 2020, 01:32 last edited by
Then we're back to questioning the efficacy of a lockdown in the face of whatever cultural reality you believe there to be.
-
@jon-nyc said in [In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak]> > > >
Temporary is a feature and if you get substantially below 1 there's no need to sustain because new cases will be manageable through contact tracing.
Wuhan supposedly got their R down to about 0.3. At that number you could go from 10k new cases a day down to under 100 in just 4 weeks. We've been locked down for about 6 weeks now.
wrote on 3 May 2020, 02:08 last edited by@jon-nyc said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:
@jon-nyc said in [In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak]> > > >
We've been locked down for about 6 weeks now.
Some of us have been locked down.
Most have just had a few snow days playing video games.
After that they went right back to costco, walmart and lowes.
-
wrote on 3 May 2020, 16:11 last edited by
For those who are sincerely interested in the letter R here is an interesting link, although I certainly don’t understand the math.
https://mrc-ide.github.io/covid19-short-term-forecasts/#content
For those who are not interested in r, just move along to s,t, u v,w....etc.
-
wrote on 3 May 2020, 17:09 last edited by
-
wrote on 3 May 2020, 17:25 last edited by
I must admit I have no idea what your prediction was. My frame was hospital utilization and deaths i.e the crisis in NYC. Obviously you are talking about something else.
The real key is if summer has impact. At one point Fauci expressed confidence it would die down with warmth and come back in the fall. I have no idea what the current thought on a pause due to weather is.
-
wrote on 3 May 2020, 18:05 last edited by jon-nyc 5 Mar 2020, 18:12
@jon-nyc said in In which jon-nyc stakes out an unconventional opinion on the Covid-19 outbreak:
My logic from above:
-
our shutdown measures were insufficient to get the reproductive rate down below 1. That was based on data from Wuhan and Europe.
-
a sharp drop in R but to a level greater than 1 will only lead to a temporary decline in cases/deaths, then they start rising inexorably from a new, lower base.
-
the temporary decline will be interpreted as victory and will lead to a loosening of mitigation measures, which then increases the reproductive rate even more.
That was my logic above. Unfortunately it seems to be playing out.
Another specific prediction was:
When we look back from, say, the end of the year, we will not see April as the month with the most cases or the most deaths.
All this was stated in the second week of April.
-
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 19:12 last edited by
CDC expects 3k deaths per day in May.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/internal-cdc-models-project-3000-daily-covid-deaths-by-june-1/
-
CDC expects 3k deaths per day in May.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/internal-cdc-models-project-3000-daily-covid-deaths-by-june-1/
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:32 last edited by
Hi. Posting from NYC. Same tag as before.
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:32 last edited by
Hey man! Long time no see!
How's the fam?
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:39 last edited by
Good. You? Thought of you recently. Nice stats/science posting!
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:42 last edited by jon-nyc 5 Apr 2020, 22:42
Hanging tight, you know I moved to Westchester, no? I think I last saw you at the boy's birthday party maybe a year before we moved.
He'll be 11 next month. Your oldest is a teenager by now, right? 15?
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:46 last edited by
Yes. We now have three.
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:48 last edited by
Eldest goes to one of the Specialized HSs. Thriving with lots of friends.
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:50 last edited by
What is your take on the open up stuff? I suspect actual mobility among the population is not that different. Under shelter in place some people push the edges, under open for business many stay home.
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:52 last edited by
Hong Kong is interesting. High density, subways, near Wuhan. 5 fatalities. Near universal mask wearing. Maybe miracle technology is a mask. Just speculating.
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:59 last edited by
Larry disappears, Jeffrey appears.
Coincidence?
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 22:59 last edited by
New Zealand, Taiwan, Hong Kong. Island pandemic success stories. Any landmass success stories? Greece, Finland? What worked and what didn’t. I am surprised there is not more country comparison analysis to guide future policy.
-
wrote on 4 May 2020, 23:01 last edited by
Copper - How are you? I’ll try to post like Larry. He had a distinctive literary style. Can you still fly? You were/are an amateur pilot, no?