Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Understanding US election polls

Understanding US election polls

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
57 Posts 16 Posters 855 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @89th said in Understanding US election polls:

    The good news I think Biden will have such strong leads that it will minimize any waffling and delaying by Trump to concede defeat within a week or so after Nov 3.

    God I hope so, but I lack your confidence.

    I was only joking

    ? 1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 89th

      The good news I think Biden will have such strong leads that it will minimize any waffling and delaying by Trump to concede defeat within a week or so after Nov 3.

      Catseye3C Offline
      Catseye3C Offline
      Catseye3
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      @89th said in Understanding US election polls:

      The good news I think Biden will have such strong leads that it will minimize any waffling and delaying by Trump to concede defeat within a week or so after Nov 3.

      Frank Bruni: "There seems to me a greater possibility now of a commanding victory by Joe Biden, and the bigger the margin, the harder it would be for President Trump to play the cheated martyr, no matter how extensively he’s been rehearsing that role."

      He goes on:

      "I emphasize 'possibility.' There remains the very real chance that Biden will lose . . . . Here’s how my friend Doug Sosnik, who was the political director in Bill Clinton’s White House and continues to analyze voting trends and dynamics, assessed Trump’s prospects in an email to me and other journalists on Sunday:

      'He continues to perform better in the battleground states that will determine the election than he does at the national level. Given the history of the 2016 campaign, Trump’s ability to turn his campaign around in the final days can’t be underestimated. Trump has a much more aggressive campaign schedule than Biden. He is drawing large crowds and is dominating local coverage in the battleground states where he is campaigning.'

      Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 89th

        17F030F7-D690-42E6-8F1F-13636EB196E2.jpeg

        CopperC Online
        CopperC Online
        Copper
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        @89th said in Understanding US election polls:

        17F030F7-D690-42E6-8F1F-13636EB196E2.jpeg

        So the polls are now even more in the bag for the dem

        Shocking

        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • Doctor PhibesD Online
          Doctor PhibesD Online
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          What I don't understand is the seemingly unquenchable optimism of the supporters of both sides.

          I've never understood optimism. How many freaking times do you need to be let down before you finally see sense?

          I was only joking

          AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
          • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

            What I don't understand is the seemingly unquenchable optimism of the supporters of both sides.

            I've never understood optimism. How many freaking times do you need to be let down before you finally see sense?

            AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            @Doctor-Phibes said in Understanding US election polls:

            I've never understood optimism. How many freaking times do you need to be let down before you finally see sense?

            Maybe we try one more time ...

            alt text

            1 Reply Last reply
            • CopperC Online
              CopperC Online
              Copper
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              Why does Rice play Texas?

              1 Reply Last reply
              • CopperC Copper

                @89th said in Understanding US election polls:

                17F030F7-D690-42E6-8F1F-13636EB196E2.jpeg

                So the polls are now even more in the bag for the dem

                Shocking

                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                @Copper said in Understanding US election polls:

                So the polls are now even more in the bag for the dem

                Those aren’t polls those are probabilities based on them.

                Note that time itself moves them. Even if the polls stay static the mere fact that there’s less time on the clock decreases your ability to turn things around.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Loki
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  Rasmussen banks on its likely voter algorithm versus most polls who use registered voters.

                  By all appearances many more people are voting this time.

                  The question in this context is who is converting more registered to likely voters.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Loki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    In other news Rasmussen has the Trump approve/disapprove spread at 52 vs 47, the biggest spread of the year I think.

                    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                    • L Loki

                      In other news Rasmussen has the Trump approve/disapprove spread at 52 vs 47, the biggest spread of the year I think.

                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      @Loki said in Understanding US election polls:

                      In other news Rasmussen has the Trump approve/disapprove spread at 52 vs 47, the biggest spread of the year

                      Don’t care about the spread, look at the numbers. 47% approve, Gallup has him at 46 and Emerson at 45. I’ve seen more Han a few analysts state the approval polls are far more important than the other polls and suggested that at 46% he wins narrowly, 47 he wins convincingly...

                      @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                      The Brad

                      Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                        @Loki said in Understanding US election polls:

                        In other news Rasmussen has the Trump approve/disapprove spread at 52 vs 47, the biggest spread of the year

                        Don’t care about the spread, look at the numbers. 47% approve, Gallup has him at 46 and Emerson at 45. I’ve seen more Han a few analysts state the approval polls are far more important than the other polls and suggested that at 46% he wins narrowly, 47 he wins convincingly...

                        @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor PhibesD Online
                        Doctor Phibes
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #38

                        @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                        @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                        Jesus, what a lightweight. I will put up 240 bottles of Budweiser. The loser has to drink it.

                        I was only joking

                        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                          @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                          @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                          Jesus, what a lightweight. I will put up 240 bottles of Budweiser. The loser has to drink it.

                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #39

                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Understanding US election polls:

                          @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                          @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                          Jesus, what a lightweight. I will put up 240 bottles of Budweiser. The loser has to drink it.

                          The 4 pack of 120 Minute probably costs more than 10 cases of Budweiser...

                          The Brad

                          Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                          • 89th8 Offline
                            89th8 Offline
                            89th
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #40

                            @LuFins-Dad deal. In fact, I’ll buy you 4 of those 4 packs and you only have to buy 1. Want to give you the odds!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                              Anecdotally speaking, I don’t now a single person that voted for Trump in 16 that won’t be voting for him this time. I know a very few that voted Clinton in 16 that won’t be voting Biden, and I know a fair number like myself that voted 3rd party or just abstained in 16 because they couldn’t stand either that are strongly considering or already have pulled the lever for Trump. Hell, Aqua’s considering it...

                              There have been record numbers of new voter registrations and while the Dems have gotten more numbers, it appears that Trump’s teams have won some of the important battleground states. I am not going to make any predictions at all except that I will be a little drunk on election night...

                              jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nycJ Online
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #41

                              @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                              Anecdotally speaking, I don’t now a single person that voted for Trump in 16 that won’t be voting for him this time.

                              All the Mullen voters I know broke for Kanye.

                              Only non-witches get due process.

                              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #42

                                Seriously though, I know 1 Trump voter who (already) voted Biden. She was one of the famed ‘Obama-Trump’ voters.

                                Only non-witches get due process.

                                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Understanding US election polls:

                                  @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                                  @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                                  Jesus, what a lightweight. I will put up 240 bottles of Budweiser. The loser has to drink it.

                                  The 4 pack of 120 Minute probably costs more than 10 cases of Budweiser...

                                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                                  Doctor Phibes
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #43

                                  @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                                  @Doctor-Phibes said in Understanding US election polls:

                                  @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                                  @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                                  Jesus, what a lightweight. I will put up 240 bottles of Budweiser. The loser has to drink it.

                                  The 4 pack of 120 Minute probably costs more than 10 cases of Budweiser...

                                  Is that stuff actually drinkable? The only beer I've had anywhere near that strong was barley wine, and it was pretty disgusting. There's also a long story associated with it which for legal reasons I can't go into here.

                                  I was only joking

                                  89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LarryL Offline
                                    LarryL Offline
                                    Larry
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #44

                                    Several of you are seriously going to require therapy once Biden loses. Seriously.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • LarryL Offline
                                      LarryL Offline
                                      Larry
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #45

                                      Link to video

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Understanding US election polls:

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                                        @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                                        Jesus, what a lightweight. I will put up 240 bottles of Budweiser. The loser has to drink it.

                                        The 4 pack of 120 Minute probably costs more than 10 cases of Budweiser...

                                        Is that stuff actually drinkable? The only beer I've had anywhere near that strong was barley wine, and it was pretty disgusting. There's also a long story associated with it which for legal reasons I can't go into here.

                                        89th8 Offline
                                        89th8 Offline
                                        89th
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #46

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Understanding US election polls:

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                                        @Doctor-Phibes said in Understanding US election polls:

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Understanding US election polls:

                                        @89th , I still don’t like his chances that much but would be willing to put up a 4 pack of that 120 Minute...

                                        Jesus, what a lightweight. I will put up 240 bottles of Budweiser. The loser has to drink it.

                                        The 4 pack of 120 Minute probably costs more than 10 cases of Budweiser...

                                        Is that stuff actually drinkable? The only beer I've had anywhere near that strong was barley wine, and it was pretty disgusting. There's also a long story associated with it which for legal reasons I can't go into here.

                                        Yes, for being 15-20% ABV, it doesn't taste that alcoholic. The hops smell/taste is very potent, but it's great if you love IPAs like I do.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • X Offline
                                          X Offline
                                          xenon
                                          wrote on last edited by xenon
                                          #47

                                          There are so many potential reasons why turnout will be different this year:

                                          • Young people are all cooped up and might actually see voting as "something to do"

                                          • Backlash to wokeness

                                          • COVID suppresses in-person senior vote

                                          • etc.

                                          Turnout is harder to model than sentiment - so I'm not going to be surprised with any outcome here.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups