Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.2k Posts 20 Posters 116.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote last edited by
    #1127

    What an odd situation. Hard to imagine Iran will just stop fighting. They had another country bomb the crap out of them and kill many of their leaders. But maybe they’ll just be fine with making extra money off of maritime traffic.

    Would be the first time Trump has ever lost. Aside from every business and political venture he’s been apart of.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote last edited by
      #1128

      Wasn't that Iran's proposal? Can't imagine that will stand. They don't own international waters.

      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

      1 Reply Last reply
      • RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote last edited by Renauda
        #1129

        Exactly. And if they were to try to enforce it, that alone would amount to a justifiable casus belli.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote last edited by Mik
          #1130

          Maybe Europe is encouraging that for an excuse to appease Trump and get involved.

          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
            #1131

            Trump floats the idea of the US and Iran forming a ‘joint venture’ to collect the tolls together.

            “We’re thinking of doing it as a joint venture,” the president told Karl, who shared Trump’s response on the social platform X. “It’s a way of securing it — also securing it from lots of other people. It’s a beautiful thing.”

            https://thehill.com/policy/international/5821343-trump-us-iran-ceasefire-deal-joint-venture-strait-of-hormuz/

            Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote last edited by
              #1132

              There’s just no idea too inappropriate.

              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

              1 Reply Last reply
              • RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote last edited by
                #1133

                Inappropriate and detached from all reality.

                Elbows up!

                1 Reply Last reply
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  AndyD
                  wrote last edited by AndyD
                  #1134

                  Fuck tolls.
                  These are international shipping waters.
                  I'd rather have a huge area of Iranian land cleared to the east of the waters and made uninhabitable.

                  And keep bombing the Iranian officials and army wherever they pop up.

                  I feel the same as the day after the Trading Towers fell or the Gazan terrorists invaded Israel.
                  Fuck them being in control of world shipping.

                  Trump's started this war, he'd better have the guts to finish it.
                  Not that the UK or USA actually need much oil from the area, but I feel very strongly about this defence of the free seas.

                  jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • A AndyD

                    Fuck tolls.
                    These are international shipping waters.
                    I'd rather have a huge area of Iranian land cleared to the east of the waters and made uninhabitable.

                    And keep bombing the Iranian officials and army wherever they pop up.

                    I feel the same as the day after the Trading Towers fell or the Gazan terrorists invaded Israel.
                    Fuck them being in control of world shipping.

                    Trump's started this war, he'd better have the guts to finish it.
                    Not that the UK or USA actually need much oil from the area, but I feel very strongly about this defence of the free seas.

                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                    #1135

                    @AndyD said:

                    Trump's started this war, he'd better have the guts to finish it.

                    I think that’s ultimately the problem. Bibi, for his own reasons, convinced Trump it would be easy and quick. Trump signed up for easy and quick and the pentagons plans for reopening the straight are probably complicated and long.

                    Not that the UK or USA actually need much oil from the area, but I feel very strongly about this defence of the free seas.

                    “Energy independence” is something of a myth (except in a blockade scenario). It’s not like we get to live in a world of $40 oil when the strait is closed. And the fact that a few American oil companies are raking it in is small consolation to your average Joe paying $5 at the gas pump.

                    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    👍
                    • Tom-KT Offline
                      Tom-KT Offline
                      Tom-K
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1136

                      We are forgetting that the reason all of this is happening is to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear threat. Now, if that was really going to happen, I haven't a clue. (And no one is even coming close to telling the truth about it.) But if it actually was than this closing of the Strait of Hormuz is just a blip.

                      Ego similis habere bonum et non curat nunquam accipere malum.

                      jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        AndyD
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1137

                        Yup.
                        If all you need is 4% enriched uranium for power plants, why do the Iranians, while also vowing to kill Americans, enrich their uranium in deep secretive bunkers to 60% and more? While also developing long range missile capabilities.

                        It's a no brainer.
                        Something proactive needed to be done.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • MikM Offline
                          MikM Offline
                          Mik
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1138

                          Should have been done 2001-2008.

                          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • Tom-KT Tom-K

                            We are forgetting that the reason all of this is happening is to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear threat. Now, if that was really going to happen, I haven't a clue. (And no one is even coming close to telling the truth about it.) But if it actually was than this closing of the Strait of Hormuz is just a blip.

                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1139

                            @Tom-K said:

                            We are forgetting that the reason all of this is happening is to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear threat. Now, if that was really going to happen, I haven't a clue. (And no one is even coming close to telling the truth about it.) But if it actually was than this closing of the Strait of Hormuz is just a blip.

                            It's not clear we've done much about that other than delay it and make them even more determined. Solving that problem requires true regime change (you have to kill the king, not wound him). Trump clearly thought they'd do that, announced that as his goal even on the first day of the attacks. The problem is Trump doesn't seem to be wiling to pay the price required to do it, at least once he found out it wasn't going to come cheap.

                            Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • Tom-KT Tom-K

                              We are forgetting that the reason all of this is happening is to keep Iran from becoming a nuclear threat. Now, if that was really going to happen, I haven't a clue. (And no one is even coming close to telling the truth about it.) But if it actually was than this closing of the Strait of Hormuz is just a blip.

                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                              #1140

                              @Tom-K said:

                              Now, if that was really going to happen, I haven't a clue. (And no one is even coming close to telling the truth about it.)

                              I'm confident it was happening. I think people misunderstand when Trump or Bibi say 'they were 2 weeks away from a bomb'. That doesn't mean they would have had a bomb in mid-march had we not attacked 2/28. It means they have enough enriched uranium at 60% that, whenever they made the decision to do so, they could further enrich it to 90% in two weeks time. (or however many weeks it was). I think that was generally true and had been for some time, and may still be true. Whatever damage the GBU-57 MOPs did last June, it didn't take out all their stockpiles.

                              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • bachophileB Offline
                                bachophileB Offline
                                bachophile
                                wrote last edited by
                                #1141

                                either way, alot of people here feel we r really fucked.

                                unless he really does manage to talk the iranians into handing over the enriched unranium

                                Tom-KT 1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #1142

                                  Iran is setting conditions to even start negotiations.

                                  Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #1143

                                    Those ‘blocked assets’ are well over $100B. According to him Trump agreed to this as a condition of the cease fire.

                                    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • 89th8 Offline
                                      89th8 Offline
                                      89th
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #1144

                                      Probably Trump trying to make it look like $100B doesn’t phase him.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #1145

                                        Heard an interesting take on the Conflicted podcast by a former Al Qaeda jihadist turned MI6 spy. He said Pakistan was up to mischief in softening the US demands when passing them to Iran, and significantly softening the Iranian demands when passing them to the US.

                                        That would explain the apparent confusion between what the administration says it accepted as the basis for ceasefire negotiations and what the Iranians published (the 10 point list). I just wish the administration would publish the 10 point list it received from the Pakis*.

                                        (*that's for you, Phebes)

                                        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • MikM Offline
                                          MikM Offline
                                          Mik
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #1146

                                          Aw, man, the pakis wouldn't lie, right? RIGHT?

                                          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                                          1 Reply Last reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups