Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump to be indicted - again.

Trump to be indicted - again.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
191 Posts 17 Posters 4.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
    #164

    Tony Blair, Margaret Thatcher, Winston Churchill

    (at least two of whom were assholes)

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      BTW, he can wave the documents around as much as he wants or he can talk about them being secret. Neither is a violation.

      JonJ Offline
      JonJ Offline
      Jon
      wrote on last edited by
      #165

      @Jolly said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

      BTW, he can wave the documents around as much as he wants or he can talk about them being secret. Neither is a violation.

      True waving it around wouldn’t make him guilty of sharing classified info.

      But waving them around makes it clear that he possesses them which is illegal. The timing of the tape (after repeatedly telling the feds he doesn’t have them) establishes willfulness AND obstruction AND lying to the feds. And the confession that he could have declassified it but didn’t undermines his former claims that he had done so.

      So yeah, this is enough to put the orange man in orange dress.

      George KG 1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

        @Axtremus said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

        @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

        @Jolly said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

        Just as an exercise, have you ever considered any politician as something other than an idiot?

        I don't think he considered Thatcher an idiot.

        On whether one ever considers any politician as something other than an idiot, you can also throw in, say, Winston Churchill or Ronald Reagan or King Solomon.

        1000 wives? Solomon was an idiot.

        AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote on last edited by
        #166

        @LuFins-Dad said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

        @Axtremus said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

        @George-K said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

        @Jolly said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

        Just as an exercise, have you ever considered any politician as something other than an idiot?

        I don't think he considered Thatcher an idiot.

        On whether one ever considers any politician as something other than an idiot, you can also throw in, say, Winston Churchill or Ronald Reagan or King Solomon.

        1000 wives? Solomon was an idiot.

        1. 1 Kings 4:29

        2. Do you consider Winston Churchill or Ronald Reagan as something other than an idiot?

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JonJ Jon

          @Jolly said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

          BTW, he can wave the documents around as much as he wants or he can talk about them being secret. Neither is a violation.

          True waving it around wouldn’t make him guilty of sharing classified info.

          But waving them around makes it clear that he possesses them which is illegal. The timing of the tape (after repeatedly telling the feds he doesn’t have them) establishes willfulness AND obstruction AND lying to the feds. And the confession that he could have declassified it but didn’t undermines his former claims that he had done so.

          So yeah, this is enough to put the orange man in orange dress.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #167

          @Jon said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

          But waving them around makes it clear that he possesses them which is illegal.

          The waved-around document is not part of the indictment.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • JonJ Offline
            JonJ Offline
            Jon
            wrote on last edited by
            #168

            It could be. As I mentioned before, he could file charges in NJ federal court too.

            George KG 1 Reply Last reply
            • JonJ Jon

              It could be. As I mentioned before, he could file charges in NJ federal court too.

              George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #169

              @Jon said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

              It could be.

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              JonJ 1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 Offline
                89th8 Offline
                89th
                wrote on last edited by
                #170

                Plans? What plans?

                Now he says he didn't have any classified documents, he was just waving around papers from his desk.


                Asked about his use of the word “plans” during a Fox News interview earlier Tuesday to describe some items he may have highlighted in the 2021 meeting, Trump insisted he was referring to “building plans” and plans for golf courses strewn about his desk.

                “Did I use the word plans?” he said. “What I’m referring to is magazines, newspapers, plans of buildings. I had plans of buildings. You know, building plans? I had plans of a golf course.”

                Asked if he had any regrets about his handling of classified documents, Trump said he did not.

                “No, I have no regrets,” he said. “I didn't have a classified document. There was no classified document on my desk.”

                George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 89th

                  Plans? What plans?

                  Now he says he didn't have any classified documents, he was just waving around papers from his desk.


                  Asked about his use of the word “plans” during a Fox News interview earlier Tuesday to describe some items he may have highlighted in the 2021 meeting, Trump insisted he was referring to “building plans” and plans for golf courses strewn about his desk.

                  “Did I use the word plans?” he said. “What I’m referring to is magazines, newspapers, plans of buildings. I had plans of buildings. You know, building plans? I had plans of a golf course.”

                  Asked if he had any regrets about his handling of classified documents, Trump said he did not.

                  “No, I have no regrets,” he said. “I didn't have a classified document. There was no classified document on my desk.”

                  George KG Offline
                  George KG Offline
                  George K
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #171

                  @89th said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                  “I didn't have a classified document. There was no classified document on my desk.”

                  Stop. Just. Stop.

                  "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                  The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • 89th8 Offline
                    89th8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #172

                    Clearly as a legal expert here, I'd imagine this is a decent defense. I mean, if you can't prove a document was there, it would be hard to convict. Then again, like you posted, I don't think this was part of the indictment anyway.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #173

                      Well, there are multiple reports of Trump brandishing (yeah, that's a good word) a classified document, and it being caught on tape.

                      If this is the tape, and if this is the document being talked about, it's not in the indictment. Therefore it's irrelevant other than a mens rea argument. This is not evidence.

                      "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                      The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • George KG George K

                        @Jon said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                        It could be.

                        JonJ Offline
                        JonJ Offline
                        Jon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #174

                        @George-K

                        You missed my point. He could file additional charges in NJ. That’s what I meant by ‘could’. It’s not too late.

                        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                        • JonJ Jon

                          @George-K

                          You missed my point. He could file additional charges in NJ. That’s what I meant by ‘could’. It’s not too late.

                          George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #175

                          @Jon said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                          You missed my point.

                          Ah, yes. I did.

                          He could file additional charges in NJ.

                          alt text

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            NobodySock
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #176

                            LOL. Hanging on to the dire end. And this is just the preamble to the biggest American criminal trial in history coming up next. Stock up on the popcorn. This is going to be such a good show.

                            George KG JollyJ CopperC 3 Replies Last reply
                            • N NobodySock

                              LOL. Hanging on to the dire end. And this is just the preamble to the biggest American criminal trial in history coming up next. Stock up on the popcorn. This is going to be such a good show.

                              George KG Offline
                              George KG Offline
                              George K
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #177

                              @NobodySock good to see you!

                              How did that Russian collusion thing work out for you, by the way?

                              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • HoraceH Offline
                                HoraceH Offline
                                Horace
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #178

                                Contrary to popular belief, most Trump supporters did not in fact vote for him in order to watch him burn the country down. Unfortunately, TDS sufferers are at a place where they will joyfully watch the country burn, as long as Trump is caught in the inferno.

                                Education is extremely important.

                                JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                • N NobodySock

                                  LOL. Hanging on to the dire end. And this is just the preamble to the biggest American criminal trial in history coming up next. Stock up on the popcorn. This is going to be such a good show.

                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  Jolly
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #179

                                  @NobodySock said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                  LOL. Hanging on to the dire end. And this is just the preamble to the biggest American criminal trial in history coming up next. Stock up on the popcorn. This is going to be such a good show.

                                  Thought you were dead.

                                  Guess not.

                                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • HoraceH Horace

                                    Contrary to popular belief, most Trump supporters did not in fact vote for him in order to watch him burn the country down. Unfortunately, TDS sufferers are at a place where they will joyfully watch the country burn, as long as Trump is caught in the inferno.

                                    JollyJ Offline
                                    JollyJ Offline
                                    Jolly
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #180

                                    @Horace said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                    Contrary to popular belief, most Trump supporters did not in fact vote for him in order to watch him burn the country down. Unfortunately, TDS sufferers are at a place where they will joyfully watch the country burn, as long as Trump is caught in the inferno.

                                    Yep.

                                    Never seen anything like it. It's been said of Trump that he is a mirror, allowing people to see what they really are.

                                    Sure are some shriveled souls out there, charred by hate.

                                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • JonJ Offline
                                      JonJ Offline
                                      Jon
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #181

                                      Maybe there’s something to be gleaned from the fact that his supporters attempt to pathologize criticism of Trump rather than defend him.

                                      HoraceH JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                                      • George KG Offline
                                        George KG Offline
                                        George K
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #182

                                        More charges?

                                        https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-giuliani-more-charges-b2366597.html?utm_source=reddit.com

                                        The team of federal prosecutors working under Special Counsel Jack Smith is currently prepared to add an “additional 30 to 45 charges” in addition to the 37-count indictment brought against Mr Trump on 8 June, either in a superseding indictment in the same Florida court or in a different federal judicial district. In either case, they would do so using evidence against the ex-president that has not yet been publicly acknowledged by the department, including other recordings prosecutors have obtained which reveal Mr Trump making incriminating statements.

                                        Additionally, it is understood that Mr Smith’s team is ready to bring charges against several of the attorneys who have worked for Mr Trump, including those who aided the ex-president in his push to ignore the will of voters and remain in the White House despite having lost the 2020 election.

                                        One of those figures is Mr Trump’s erstwhile personal attorney, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani.

                                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • JonJ Jon

                                          Maybe there’s something to be gleaned from the fact that his supporters attempt to pathologize criticism of Trump rather than defend him.

                                          HoraceH Offline
                                          HoraceH Offline
                                          Horace
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #183

                                          @Jon said in Trump to be indicted - again.:

                                          Maybe there’s something to be gleaned from the fact that his supporters attempt to pathologize criticism of Trump rather than defend him.

                                          Last I checked, you denied the existence of TDS. It is hardly a novel insight that righteous hatred of an out group, blinds.

                                          Education is extremely important.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups