Student loans
-
@Catseye3 said in Student loans:
@Aqua-Letifer said in Student loans:
Holy crap, brenda. ️ I'm so sorry you had to deal with that.
Right back at ya, buddy!
-
While sad, it has a silver lining in that you rose above and are stronger and more loving for it.
@Mik said in Student loans:
While sad, it has a silver lining in that you rose above and are stronger and more loving for it.
Ayup. Some people teach you how to be, and some people teach you how not to be.
I recently had a profound moment with kiddo when she said she wanted me to talk with one of her friends who is having trouble. Kiddo said this friend needed a good parent to help her.
Wow. Best compliment ever from kiddo. Virtual hugs all around for that one!
-
Cats
writing down deontological to look up later; it's too nice a day to get hung up on this shit.@Catseye3 said in Student loans:
Cats
writing down deontological to look up later; it's too nice a day to get hung up on this shit.Copied from Wikipedia:
In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek: δέον, 'obligation, duty' + λόγος, 'study') is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. It is sometimes described as duty-, obligation-, or rule-based ethics. Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted to consequentialism, virtue ethics, and pragmatic ethics. In this terminology, action is more important than the consequences.
-
Paying off someone's loan for free would just suck the self-respect right out of them.
Anyone who had their loan paid off for no good reason would never get a good night's sleep again.
Most of them would probably end up as suicides.
The action itself is wrong.
-
In this article is exactly the people I do not sympathize with. $323,000 debt to be a teacher.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
What idiot borrows over 300 grand to be a teacher?
And who would lend it to her?
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@Catseye3 said in Student loans:
Cats
writing down deontological to look up later; it's too nice a day to get hung up on this shit.Copied from Wikipedia:
In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek: δέον, 'obligation, duty' + λόγος, 'study') is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. It is sometimes described as duty-, obligation-, or rule-based ethics. Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted to consequentialism, virtue ethics, and pragmatic ethics. In this terminology, action is more important than the consequences.
@Axtremus said in Student loans:
. . . the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. It is sometimes described as . . . rule-based ethics.
Thanks, Ax.
One of my favorite writers, Robert Crais, wrote a scene where the hero's best friend, a cop, and his partner -- also a cop but a sketchy one -- were about to arrest a suspected child molester and murderer. After some stuff, the sketchy cop was fixing to shoot the badguy when the first cop shot his partner to prevent him from doing this. Howling outrage back at the cop shop, needless to say.
The rules totally forbad the harming of a cop to save the life of a badguy, in this case a really bad guy. But the shooting cop could not accept what he saw as the greater crime -- a cop shooting someone to death on suspicion and/or general dislike of a non-threatening suspect (at that moment), without due process.
So he broke the rules, but felt he had no choice.
So deontologically what he did was wrong, yes?
