@LuFins-Dad said in "Adults only": @Mik said in "Adults only": Good. I would have no objection if these parades were modest, but they never are. The parade is allowed. It’s allowed in front of kids. It’s just not allowed to include nudity, twerking, and blatantly sexual acts in front of kids. It’s kind of telling that they don’t want to do it if they can’t be lewd in front of kids. Preach on!

@jon-nyc LOL.

On the day Michael was accepted to Yale—arguably the best law school in the world—he also believed that monkeys were eating his brain. The line between genius and madness may be thinner than we think. Thought this was an interesting thought by the author: If you believe that all mental illness is a social construct, even severe mental illness, and that the only reason why asylums were built in the eighteenth century, as Foucault says, is as a place to put your enemies who you’ve othered by calling mad simply because they swim against the rational stream, then there really isn’t any illness. There’s only power. And the people who have power can call the people they hate ill. Now, there’s plenty of abuse of power. But if illness is real, then that formula deprives people of any form of care, and the only response to a hospital, a mental hospital, or a psychiatric hospital, is to treat it like the Bastille and tear it down. In fact, one of the most devastating passages in Madness and Civilization is about Philippe Pinel, who was the eighteenth-century reformist psychiatrist. He was really the father of humane psychiatry and he’s often depicted in paintings striking the chains from his patients because they were chained even inside the hospitals. And for Foucault, he is the villain. It takes a minute to realize that the reason he’s the villain is precisely because he improved the lot of people in those hospitals. The reforming impulse, the liberal impulse, is dangerous because the only response is the absolute destruction of that system and that world. The system of state hospitals that might have been reformed were instead effectively torn down and they were not replaced by anything equipped to care for the people who had once been in those hospitals.

@Mik Congratulations to your daughter!!!

@Jolly I did see that. But I think my point is still valid. If you are a Democrat, you would look at the nominations and say, "In general, Democrats are more willing to put up judges that are acceptable to both parties." If you are Republic, you would look at the nominations and say, "In general, Republics are more willing to work with Democrats to confirm judges"

@Mik said in Docs' paperwork and administrativa: So….you had the easy job. Believe me, the (relative) lack of paperwork was one of the attractions. Any paperwork I did happened DURING the case - recording drugs, fluids, BP, and other vital signs.

To claim the money: What information do I need to provide? The claim asks for basic information: Your name Your address Your email Your phone If you resided in the U.S. between May 24, 2007, and December 22, 2022 If you were a Facebook user between May 24, 2007, and December 22, 2022 If you deleted your account in that period, the date range when you were a Facebook user Your Facebook user name The payment service you prefer, such as PayPal, Venmo or a prepaid Mastercard Facebook does not already have those information about me (at least not in a way that’s tied to my very rarely used Facebook account). Don’t think I want to give Facebook all that information.

@George-K Right but with one caveat. That being Strategic Studies or, as we called it in grad school, Bombs and Rockets. Only a select few universities offer degree programmes in it up here.

Speaking of FSB assets: https://www.wsj.com/articles/fbi-investigating-ex-navy-noncommissioned-officer-linked-to-pro-russia-social-media-account-e0cf9a10?st=bvijn0ye6la1lsp&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

And branching out from my above statement a bit...We have a very serious problem in this part of the world. We have lost doctors right and left. Many due to retirement, some due to better opportunities in bigger markets. My thoracic surgeon is now in Lafayette. My guy that treats my May-Thurman is in Lafayette. My wife's endocrinologist is in Lafayette. Her ENT is in Baton Rouge. Her hand guy is in Shreveport. In 1980, we had a 200 bed state teaching hospital affiliated with Tulane, a 300 bed hospital ran by the Sisters of the Incarnate Word, a 400 bed hospital that was later sucked up by HCA and a 200 bed VA hospital. Now, the state hospital is gone, the HCA facility just lost their Level 2 trauma rating and the Christus facility is down to about 200 beds, IIRC. It's because of a variety of factors...A greying local population and lower reimbursements because of Medicare, a high percentage of Medicaid patients, high medical school debt and an inability to make enough money in this market, a lack of cooperation between the private entities in the area resulting in a duplication of services where nobody makes enough money. And...If you're from here, it's a great place to raise kids. It's boring. Hard to recruit young docs from elsewhere to move to boring. So right now, we have a high level of mediocrity in medical care and are probably 5 years behind where we used to be. Sadly.

@George-K said in Shooting People to Advance Gun Bans: Denied: https://www.dailywire.com/news/nashville-police-deny-daily-wires-request-for-trans-shooters-manifesto I'm guessing one of two things: There is something in there detrimental to the community or to the school...Something like an unproven allegation. There's some weird transgender stuff in there and the Democrat administration of teh city doesn't want to feed the Trans=Mental problems equation.

@bachophile said in Some good news: any tackle on the T wave [image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia4.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FxTiN0mKP2Am8PuQW0U%2Fsource.gif&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=15a0aa09becce096e001e347b848b40ea1338775b4d3815caea91f2352ff764f&ipo=images]

Which is good. Too much barefooting about in one's own head is unhealthy. We'd all do better to follow the Popeye philosophy. Mr. Natural, too.

The doc is not protected. The judge that threw the case out, is not saying the cases do not have merit, he's just saying they need to be brought under malpractice statues. If that's the law, maybe they need to change the law.

Reasons 1 and 2 - Ok, we can leave those out, though I think in our culture Christian marriage is more the norm than not. Reason 3 - I think that's very hard to argue against. Porn is very exploitive of women. Women are trafficked within the industry, many made to perform sex acts they do not want to do. Reason 4 - Does porn promote violence against women? His figure given is 40% of porn videos do...I'll be generous and ballpark that to a third. That's still a lot of objectification and violence against women, through male dominance. Reason 5 - See 4 Reason 6 - Goes back to 1 and 2, but isn't that the thrust of the article? Prager's views on porn in both societal and religious marriage? Reason 7 - He uses Paul as an example, but his point is universally valid. In a monogamous marriage (and no, that's what we have, not what you would like), when you introduce sex acts with other people into the marriage, you eventually weaken the marriage. Porn is more insidious, since the act is not physical, but it does creates altered perceptions of intimate reality and eventually causes harm. Reason 8 - Does porn shatter trust in a marriage? I don't know if it shatters trust, but it constantly sends a message to the wife that she's not young enough, not built well enough, not adventuresome enough, not willing enough. In short, she's simply not enough. Reason 9 - see 8. Reason 10 - Does porn crush intimacy? Certainly, if the fantasy is replacing reality. Reason 11 - Duty sex. Exactly what it says. Reason 12 - Sexual dysfunction. This was the author's cite: https://www.insider.com/men-who-watch-lots-of-porn-worse-erectile-dysfunction-2020-7 You can look up the original paper, if you wish, but the findings were interesting, in that porn consumption and erectile dysfunction seem to be linked in a significant portion of men, especially young men. Reason 13 - That one is about rewiring one's brain. Again, the author's cite: https://neurosciencenews.com/neuroscience-pornography-brain-15354/ The statement that porn rewires the brain is the subject of more than one paper. One from PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3050060/ Reason 14 - again religious.

Steinbeck being Steinbeck. That was excellent.

I think it's bad for the sport, especially when guys are gambling on games they are playing in.

https://www.rokdrop.net/2023/04/19/hyundai-to-increase-ev-manufacturing-in-the-u-s-in-response-to-inflation-reduction-act/