Spying?
-
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.
I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.
Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.
Then I assume you condone such actions?
If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.
Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.
So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.
Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of
at MickeyD's.In the here and now, what is your position?
I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.
Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.
Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 13:23 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.
I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.
Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.
Then I assume you condone such actions?
If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.
Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.
So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.
Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of
at MickeyD's.In the here and now, what is your position?
I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.
Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.
Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.
And your mere existence is hilarious.
Next...
-
@doctor-phibes said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.
I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.
Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.
Then I assume you condone such actions?
If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.
Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.
So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.
Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of
at MickeyD's.In the here and now, what is your position?
I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.
Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.
Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.
And your mere existence is hilarious.
Next...
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 13:24 last edited by@doctor-phibes said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.
I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.
Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.
Then I assume you condone such actions?
If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.
Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.
So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.
Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of
at MickeyD's.In the here and now, what is your position?
I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.
Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.
Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.
And your mere existence is hilarious.
Next...
Oh yeah, you really nailed me with that comeback.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.
I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.
Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.
Then I assume you condone such actions?
If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.
Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.
So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.
Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of
at MickeyD's.In the here and now, what is your position?
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 14:39 last edited by@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
@aqua-letifer said in Spying?:
We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.
I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.
Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.
Then I assume you condone such actions?
If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.
Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.
So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.
Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of
at MickeyD's.In the here and now, what is your position?
Good luck dismantling the secret courts. Privacy died about 10 years ago. Which was an abomination but what can you do.
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 14:41 last edited by
Is TuCa still talking about this or just us?
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 15:27 last edited by Doctor Phibes 7 Sept 2021, 15:27
Incidentally, Piers Morgan is not a US Citizen.
I'd like to volunteer his services to be spied on by the US Government, and hopefully he can receive a bonus follow-up waterboarding. All perfectly legal.
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 16:18 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 16:36 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 16:59 last edited by
@doctor-phibes said in Spying?:
There are some things that are above politics.
Conservative journalists getting spied on, for example.
Sod off.
Truly and sincerely. It's a serious issue, and it deserves serious consideration.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Spying?:
There are some things that are above politics.
Conservative journalists getting spied on, for example.
Sod off.
Truly and sincerely. It's a serious issue, and it deserves serious consideration.
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 17:44 last edited by Doctor Phibes 7 Sept 2021, 17:45@doctor-phibes said in Spying?:
There are some things that are above politics.
Conservative journalists getting spied on, for example.
Sod off.
Truly and sincerely. It's a serious issue, and it deserves serious consideration.
I completely agree. I thought it was a serious issue back when Snowden and that creepy Australian were the news story, too.
However, it's nothing new.
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 18:39 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 18:40 last edited by
That's the non-denial George was referring to.
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 18:45 last edited by
"Tucker Carlson has never been an intelligence target of this agency."
I swear, sometimes the jokes just write themselves.
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 18:53 last edited by
-
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 20:32 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 20:38 last edited by
Shouldn’t he get Fox onboard as a first step?
No idea.
But the annotations on the so-called "denial" are pretty lawyerly, aren't they?
Again, the only thing they explicitly deny is him being an "intelligence target."
Hmmm....I wonder if NSA has other kinds of "targets?"
My limited understanding is that anytime someone, say even an ambassador makes contact with a foreign entity of interest a masked entry occurs. Unmasking to the public is illegal. So the question if TuCa’s allegation is true is that the NSA intnentionally unmasked him..or someone with access leaked it. So maybe NSA has to find the leak or TuCa would know he was targeted by virtue of contacting Putin and is making shit up.
His employer should support him, why are they quiet??
-
Shouldn’t he get Fox onboard as a first step?
No idea.
But the annotations on the so-called "denial" are pretty lawyerly, aren't they?
Again, the only thing they explicitly deny is him being an "intelligence target."
Hmmm....I wonder if NSA has other kinds of "targets?"
My limited understanding is that anytime someone, say even an ambassador makes contact with a foreign entity of interest a masked entry occurs. Unmasking to the public is illegal. So the question if TuCa’s allegation is true is that the NSA intnentionally unmasked him..or someone with access leaked it. So maybe NSA has to find the leak or TuCa would know he was targeted by virtue of contacting Putin and is making shit up.
His employer should support him, why are they quiet??
wrote on 9 Jul 2021, 20:41 last edited byUnmasking to the public is illegal.
Is unmasking to other members of the NSA illegal? I don't know.
However, it was revealed that various members of the incoming Trump administration were unmasked as well. How did that become public? Through a FOIA? Again, I don't know.
I can't speak to the reticence of Fox to involve themselves.
