Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Spying?

Spying?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
153 Posts 13 Posters 3.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

    @jolly said in Spying?:

    We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

    I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

    Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

    JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

    @jolly said in Spying?:

    We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

    I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

    Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

    Then I assume you condone such actions?

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

      @jolly said in Spying?:

      We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

      I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

      Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

      Then I assume you condone such actions?

      Aqua LetiferA Offline
      Aqua LetiferA Offline
      Aqua Letifer
      wrote on last edited by Aqua Letifer
      #61

      @jolly said in Spying?:

      @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

      @jolly said in Spying?:

      We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

      I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

      Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

      Then I assume you condone such actions?

      If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

      Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

      So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

      Please love yourself.

      JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • Aqua LetiferA Offline
        Aqua LetiferA Offline
        Aqua Letifer
        wrote on last edited by Aqua Letifer
        #62

        What's especially insane to me is that this, too, always becomes a partisan issue. Whoever complains about it gets support from their side until the next Bad Thing happens, and the opposite side ignores it until it's their mouthpiece's turn. No one actually gives a shit that the very concept of privacy died about a decade ago.

        Please love yourself.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

          @jolly said in Spying?:

          @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

          @jolly said in Spying?:

          We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

          I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

          Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

          Then I assume you condone such actions?

          If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

          Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

          So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #63

          @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

          @jolly said in Spying?:

          @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

          @jolly said in Spying?:

          We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

          I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

          Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

          Then I assume you condone such actions?

          If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

          Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

          So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

          Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

          In the here and now, what is your position?

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          Doctor PhibesD Aqua LetiferA 2 Replies Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

            @jolly said in Spying?:

            @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

            @jolly said in Spying?:

            We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

            I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

            Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

            Then I assume you condone such actions?

            If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

            Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

            So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

            Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

            In the here and now, what is your position?

            Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor PhibesD Offline
            Doctor Phibes
            wrote on last edited by
            #64

            @jolly said in Spying?:

            @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

            @jolly said in Spying?:

            @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

            @jolly said in Spying?:

            We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

            I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

            Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

            Then I assume you condone such actions?

            If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

            Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

            So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

            Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

            In the here and now, what is your position?

            I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.

            Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.

            Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.

            I was only joking

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

              @jolly said in Spying?:

              @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

              @jolly said in Spying?:

              @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

              @jolly said in Spying?:

              We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

              I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

              Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

              Then I assume you condone such actions?

              If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

              Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

              So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

              Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

              In the here and now, what is your position?

              I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.

              Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.

              Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #65

              @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

              @jolly said in Spying?:

              @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

              @jolly said in Spying?:

              @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

              @jolly said in Spying?:

              We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

              I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

              Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

              Then I assume you condone such actions?

              If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

              Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

              So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

              Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

              In the here and now, what is your position?

              I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.

              Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.

              Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.

              And your mere existence is hilarious.

              Next...

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
              • JollyJ Jolly

                @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

                @jolly said in Spying?:

                @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

                @jolly said in Spying?:

                @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

                @jolly said in Spying?:

                We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

                I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

                Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

                Then I assume you condone such actions?

                If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

                Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

                So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

                Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

                In the here and now, what is your position?

                I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.

                Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.

                Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.

                And your mere existence is hilarious.

                Next...

                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote on last edited by
                #66

                @jolly said in Spying?:

                @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

                @jolly said in Spying?:

                @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

                @jolly said in Spying?:

                @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

                @jolly said in Spying?:

                We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

                I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

                Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

                Then I assume you condone such actions?

                If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

                Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

                So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

                Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

                In the here and now, what is your position?

                I agreed with him at the time, and made the exact point that it doesn't matter what kind of person Snowden is.

                Now, you're complaining about us being, and I quote, 'partisan dim-witted bastards'.

                Your lack of self-awareness is hilarious.

                And your mere existence is hilarious.

                Next...

                Oh yeah, you really nailed me with that comeback.

                I was only joking

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

                  @jolly said in Spying?:

                  @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

                  @jolly said in Spying?:

                  We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

                  I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

                  Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

                  Then I assume you condone such actions?

                  If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

                  Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

                  So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

                  Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

                  In the here and now, what is your position?

                  Aqua LetiferA Offline
                  Aqua LetiferA Offline
                  Aqua Letifer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #67

                  @jolly said in Spying?:

                  @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

                  @jolly said in Spying?:

                  @aqua-letifer said in Spying?:

                  @jolly said in Spying?:

                  We're not talking a one-off or sudden disclosure of classified information. We're talking about something that has been proven to happen multiple times. We're talking about a series of events. We're talking normalization of criminal behavior by your government.

                  I've literally heard this all before, man. All of it. Tucker's complaints amount to about a sliver of what the Snowden documents revealed in terms of what the government already considers commonplace practice.

                  Respectfully, I think the story is "this affects all of us, I'm beyond the politics" because it's Tucker Carlson. If it were Ta-Nehisi Coates I really don't believe your perspective would be the same.

                  Then I assume you condone such actions?

                  If you had read any of my posts when the Snowden documents became public, which you didn't, you'd know I have a serious problem with them.

                  Had you read them at the time, you'd also be keenly aware of my disbelief that you and other conservatives were not taking any of it seriously, deciding to completely focus instead on how much of a shithead Edward Snowden was.

                  So I'm sorry, it's hard for me not to roll my eyes over the Carlson stuff. None of this shit is new. If it's new to you then you haven't been paying nearly enough attention.

                  Again, you're just miffed because no one paid attention to your lone howl in the wilderness. Well, as of right now, that and a dollar bill will buy a small cup of ☕ at MickeyD's.

                  In the here and now, what is your position?

                  Good luck dismantling the secret courts. Privacy died about 10 years ago. Which was an abomination but what can you do.

                  Please love yourself.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Loki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #68

                    Is TuCa still talking about this or just us?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                      #69

                      Incidentally, Piers Morgan is not a US Citizen.

                      I'd like to volunteer his services to be spied on by the US Government, and hopefully he can receive a bonus follow-up waterboarding. All perfectly legal.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Jolly

                        Don't get hung up on the politics.

                        Catseye3C Offline
                        Catseye3C Offline
                        Catseye3
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #70

                        @jolly said in Spying?:

                        Don't get hung up on the politics.

                        Okay, who are you and what have you done with Jolly???

                        Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • Catseye3C Catseye3

                          @jolly said in Spying?:

                          Don't get hung up on the politics.

                          Okay, who are you and what have you done with Jolly???

                          JollyJ Offline
                          JollyJ Offline
                          Jolly
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #71

                          @catseye3 said in Spying?:

                          @jolly said in Spying?:

                          Don't get hung up on the politics.

                          Okay, who are you and what have you done with Jolly???

                          There are some things that are above politics. If we can't agree on this, piss on the campfire and call the dogs, it's over.

                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                          Doctor PhibesD Catseye3C 2 Replies Last reply
                          • JollyJ Jolly

                            @catseye3 said in Spying?:

                            @jolly said in Spying?:

                            Don't get hung up on the politics.

                            Okay, who are you and what have you done with Jolly???

                            There are some things that are above politics. If we can't agree on this, piss on the campfire and call the dogs, it's over.

                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor PhibesD Offline
                            Doctor Phibes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #72

                            @jolly said in Spying?:

                            There are some things that are above politics.

                            Conservative journalists getting spied on, for example.

                            I was only joking

                            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                              @jolly said in Spying?:

                              There are some things that are above politics.

                              Conservative journalists getting spied on, for example.

                              JollyJ Offline
                              JollyJ Offline
                              Jolly
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #73

                              @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

                              @jolly said in Spying?:

                              There are some things that are above politics.

                              Conservative journalists getting spied on, for example.

                              Sod off.

                              Truly and sincerely. It's a serious issue, and it deserves serious consideration.

                              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                              Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                              • JollyJ Jolly

                                @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

                                @jolly said in Spying?:

                                There are some things that are above politics.

                                Conservative journalists getting spied on, for example.

                                Sod off.

                                Truly and sincerely. It's a serious issue, and it deserves serious consideration.

                                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                Doctor Phibes
                                wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                                #74

                                @jolly said in Spying?:

                                @doctor-phibes said in Spying?:

                                @jolly said in Spying?:

                                There are some things that are above politics.

                                Conservative journalists getting spied on, for example.

                                Sod off.

                                Truly and sincerely. It's a serious issue, and it deserves serious consideration.

                                I completely agree. I thought it was a serious issue back when Snowden and that creepy Australian were the news story, too.

                                However, it's nothing new.

                                I was only joking

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Loki
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #75

                                  NSA denies it. Who has the next move?

                                  Doctor PhibesD George KG 2 Replies Last reply
                                  • JollyJ Offline
                                    JollyJ Offline
                                    Jolly
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #76

                                    That's the non-denial George was referring to.

                                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • Catseye3C Offline
                                      Catseye3C Offline
                                      Catseye3
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #77

                                      "Tucker Carlson has never been an intelligence target of this agency."

                                      I swear, sometimes the jokes just write themselves. 😂

                                      Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • L Loki

                                        NSA denies it. Who has the next move?

                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #78

                                        @loki said in Spying?:

                                        NSA denies it. Who has the next move?

                                        His book publisher?

                                        I was only joking

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • JollyJ Jolly

                                          That's the non-denial George was referring to.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Loki
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #79

                                          @jolly said in Spying?:

                                          That's the non-denial George was referring to.

                                          Here is an equally good question, why has Fox News, his employer, NOT confirmed the allegation?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups