Hero Or Snitch?
-
The kid's 16. The father's old enough to be a grown up.
It does actually matter.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 13:15 last edited by@doctor-phibes The article said 18?
-
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
Turning in your father to the FBI for what amounts to criminal trespass
No, sorry, if the courts press further charges then you are going to be absolutely wrong about that. You don't get to downplay the charges because he's a fringe member of the side you endorse.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 13:31 last edited by@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
Turning in your father to the FBI for what amounts to criminal trespass
No, sorry, if the courts press further charges then you are going to be absolutely wrong about that. You don't get to downplay the charges because he's a fringe member of the side you endorse.
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@mik said in Hero Or Snitch?:
Not sure the distinction is relevant, but I'd say Jackson will be racking up some big student loans.
The harm, ruin perhaps, he has inflicted on his whole family, not just his father, is grossly out of proportion to the miniscule harm done to the nation. That doesn't fit my definition of a hero.
I don't think the kid's a hero by any stretch, but is the takeaway here to let your loved ones commit federal crimes? What should have been done instead, just ignore it?
No crime had been committed when he called and his call prevented nothing. So yeah, he should not have done it. A 16 year old's judgement, or lack thereof, is not sufficient to bring the feds down on your family.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 13:35 last edited by@mik said in Hero Or Snitch?:
No crime had been committed when he called and his call prevented nothing. So yeah, he should not have done it. A 16 year old's judgement, or lack thereof, is not sufficient to bring the feds down on your family.
I'm writing this as of reading Post #9, so forgive if I'm repeating something somebody else said.
I agree with Mik's statement. I'd like to know more about the family dynamics before I could answer Jolly's question. That does not sound like a harmonious family unit. If the kid had issues with daddy beforehand, that puts a different light on things . . . the mother doesn't sound like she has too tight a grip on reality, either.
The one thing you can believe is that as far as da ink goes, this puppy is golden!
-
A police was killed in teh capital as well as the protestor lady. Makes it pretty serious to me.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 13:35 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Hero Or Snitch?:
A police was killed in teh capital as well as the protestor lady. Makes it pretty serious to me.
And over twenty people were killed last year in BLM and Antifa riots.
Your point?
-
@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
Turning in your father to the FBI for what amounts to criminal trespass
No, sorry, if the courts press further charges then you are going to be absolutely wrong about that. You don't get to downplay the charges because he's a fringe member of the side you endorse.
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 13:44 last edited by@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.I'm reflecting on the many warnings the feds got ahead of 9/11, and which they did not take seriously. Somebody sure as hell was "short-sighted" there, but it wasn't the people who tried to warn in advance -- including the two Israelis who flew to Washington for the express purpose.
-
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.I'm reflecting on the many warnings the feds got ahead of 9/11, and which they did not take seriously. Somebody sure as hell was "short-sighted" there, but it wasn't the people who tried to warn in advance -- including the two Israelis who flew to Washington for the express purpose.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 13:51 last edited by Jolly 2 Jan 2021, 13:52@catseye3 said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.I'm reflecting on the many warnings the feds got ahead of 9/11, and which they did not take seriously. Somebody sure as hell was "short-sighted" there, but it wasn't the people who tried to warn in advance -- including the two Israelis who flew to Washington for the express purpose.
And what does that have to do with this kid?
-
@catseye3 said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.I'm reflecting on the many warnings the feds got ahead of 9/11, and which they did not take seriously. Somebody sure as hell was "short-sighted" there, but it wasn't the people who tried to warn in advance -- including the two Israelis who flew to Washington for the express purpose.
And what does that have to do with this kid?
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 14:01 last edited by@jolly The kid supposedly warned about something that might happen, and you call the reaction "short-sighted". I'm saying in 9/11, the warnings were justified, and it was the feds who were short-sighted, and nobody has come forward to condemn those who tried to warn about 9/11.
I'm not endorsing what the kid did. But your comment that there was short-sightedness is unjustified.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
Turning in your father to the FBI for what amounts to criminal trespass
No, sorry, if the courts press further charges then you are going to be absolutely wrong about that. You don't get to downplay the charges because he's a fringe member of the side you endorse.
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 14:03 last edited by@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.No, I already laid out in detail how I think it should have been handled.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
Turning in your father to the FBI for what amounts to criminal trespass
No, sorry, if the courts press further charges then you are going to be absolutely wrong about that. You don't get to downplay the charges because he's a fringe member of the side you endorse.
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 14:10 last edited by@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
Turning in your father to the FBI for what amounts to criminal trespass
No, sorry, if the courts press further charges then you are going to be absolutely wrong about that. You don't get to downplay the charges because he's a fringe member of the side you endorse.
So, we need to destroy families on the possibility the guy may have done something?
How wonderful. And biased. And short-sighted.
There is not enough known about the kid, the dad, their motivations, and their actual intents to make any kind of judgment.
If the Oklahoma City Bomber had a kid and the kid reported the dad beforehand... Good job. If this kid was just embarrassed and frustrated because his dad embarrassed him because of his politics and the dad made some nebulous statement then the kid is an asshole.
There is a whole world in between those two positions, and the truth is that it probably falls somewhere in the middle and they are both idiots.
-
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 14:10 last edited by
Is it just conceivable that he is neither a hero nor a low-life scumbag?
-
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 14:17 last edited by
I would say that is pretty close to the truth. If you will notice I have not argued for either label. I simply think the kid should not have made the call.
-
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 14:21 last edited by
True, but this is family.
It's not like a conversation heard in a bar or some guy running his head at work.
-
True, but this is family.
It's not like a conversation heard in a bar or some guy running his head at work.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 14:29 last edited by Doctor Phibes 2 Jan 2021, 14:29 -
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 14:30 last edited by Catseye3 2 Jan 2021, 14:31
deleted.
-
True, but this is family.
It's not like a conversation heard in a bar or some guy running his head at work.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 18:35 last edited by@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
True, but this is family.
That sounds like something Micheal Corleone would have said.
-
What do @Jolly and Michael Carleone have in common?
They both put FAMILY above LAW & ORDER!!!
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 20:08 last edited by@axtremus said in Hero Or Snitch?:
What do @Jolly and Michael Carleone have in common?
They both put FAMILY above LAW & ORDER!!!
I do. I place a very high emphasis on family. In this case...
Because I know much of the law is corrupt and applied unequally. Second, because AFAIK, there is no major crime involved.
-
@axtremus said in Hero Or Snitch?:
What do @Jolly and Michael Carleone have in common?
They both put FAMILY above LAW & ORDER!!!
I do. I place a very high emphasis on family. In this case...
Because I know much of the law is corrupt and applied unequally. Second, because AFAIK, there is no major crime involved.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 23:47 last edited by@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@axtremus said in Hero Or Snitch?:
What do @Jolly and Michael Carleone have in common?
They both put FAMILY above LAW & ORDER!!!
I do. I place a very high emphasis on family. In this case...
Because I know much of the law is corrupt and applied unequally. Second, because AFAIK, there is no major crime involved.
Your position would be completely different if you replaced "Trump rally" with "BLM rally."
-
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@axtremus said in Hero Or Snitch?:
What do @Jolly and Michael Carleone have in common?
They both put FAMILY above LAW & ORDER!!!
I do. I place a very high emphasis on family. In this case...
Because I know much of the law is corrupt and applied unequally. Second, because AFAIK, there is no major crime involved.
Your position would be completely different if you replaced "Trump rally" with "BLM rally."
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 23:52 last edited by@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@axtremus said in Hero Or Snitch?:
What do @Jolly and Michael Carleone have in common?
They both put FAMILY above LAW & ORDER!!!
I do. I place a very high emphasis on family. In this case...
Because I know much of the law is corrupt and applied unequally. Second, because AFAIK, there is no major crime involved.
Your position would be completely different if you replaced "Trump rally" with "BLM rally."
That is for sure.
The snitch would have disappeared a long time ago, or perhaps just hung himself.
-
@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@axtremus said in Hero Or Snitch?:
What do @Jolly and Michael Carleone have in common?
They both put FAMILY above LAW & ORDER!!!
I do. I place a very high emphasis on family. In this case...
Because I know much of the law is corrupt and applied unequally. Second, because AFAIK, there is no major crime involved.
Your position would be completely different if you replaced "Trump rally" with "BLM rally."
That is for sure.
The snitch would have disappeared a long time ago, or perhaps just hung himself.
wrote on 1 Feb 2021, 23:52 last edited by@copper said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@aqua-letifer said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@jolly said in Hero Or Snitch?:
@axtremus said in Hero Or Snitch?:
What do @Jolly and Michael Carleone have in common?
They both put FAMILY above LAW & ORDER!!!
I do. I place a very high emphasis on family. In this case...
Because I know much of the law is corrupt and applied unequally. Second, because AFAIK, there is no major crime involved.
Your position would be completely different if you replaced "Trump rally" with "BLM rally."
That is for sure.
The snitch would have disappeared a long time ago, or perhaps just hung himself.
Repeatedly.