Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump lawsuits

Trump lawsuits

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
170 Posts 21 Posters 3.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Honest question, are there any he’s filed that could even conceivably change anything?

    The PA votes mailed before Election Day but arrived after aren’t enough to change anything.

    What else does he have pending with actual votes attached to it? Anyone know?

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • LarryL Offline
      LarryL Offline
      Larry
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Well, there's the 140,000 ballots that arrived in trash bags at 4am that were all for Biden to sort out, and then there's the bogus software that was programmed to change votes from Trump to Biden that was used by around half the country that has to be addressed. You just might be crowing a bit too soon.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
        #3

        Ok Larry so I should be able to read about that and see the evidence in Trump’s filing.

        Right?

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • LarryL Offline
          LarryL Offline
          Larry
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I think another few days and you'll have more to look at than you ever wanted to see.

          AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Ok, I’ll wait.

            But that’ll be my filter for what’s worth spending time on. Surely Trump’s team will hear every story you do and if they think there’s anything to it they’ll present it to a judge.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
            • LarryL Larry

              I think another few days and you'll have more to look at than you ever wanted to see.

              AxtremusA Offline
              AxtremusA Offline
              Axtremus
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @Larry said in Trump lawsuits:

              I think another few days and you'll have more to look at than you ever wanted to see.

              Kindly link to the Trump campaign's court filings when that time comes, presumably "another few days" from now.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Here's a day-old link keeping track.

                https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trumps-election-lawsuits-where-the-fights-are-playing-out

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                Catseye3C 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Here's a really thorough list through it doesn't filter by what's pending vs. what's already been dismissed.

                  https://www.scotusblog.com/election-litigation/

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    Ok, I’ll wait.

                    But that’ll be my filter for what’s worth spending time on. Surely Trump’s team will hear every story you do and if they think there’s anything to it they’ll present it to a judge.

                    89th8 Offline
                    89th8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:

                    Ok, I’ll wait.

                    Might be a while. 555

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      Here's a day-old link keeping track.

                      https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trumps-election-lawsuits-where-the-fights-are-playing-out

                      Catseye3C Offline
                      Catseye3C Offline
                      Catseye3
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:

                      Here's a day-old link keeping track.
                      https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trumps-election-lawsuits-where-the-fights-are-playing-out

                      Thanks for this, Jon. I've bookmarked it.

                      Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                        #11

                        Trump has a new suit in PA.

                        Based on my quick perusal he appears to be asking the courts to issue an order prohibiting the Secretary of State from certifying the results statewide. Not 'until XYZ conditions are fulfilled'. Just prohibit it period.

                        Make no small plans!

                        (caveat, it is 105 pages I have just skimmed it and could be misinterpreting it)

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Read the thread.

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          KlausK 1 Reply Last reply
                          • LarryL Offline
                            LarryL Offline
                            Larry
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Al Gore did the exact same thing Trump is doing, and he did it in only 3 counties in one state. But when Al Gore did it, the same people saying Trump is just a sore loser defended Al Gore because HE was defending the Constitution and the integrity of the voting process.

                            The truth is, democrats are hypocrites.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                              #14

                              No, Gore was trying to encourage recounting. Not wipe out a state's election results. This is categorically different.

                              If Trump had to sue to get a recount in GA or WI then you could make that point. But to my knowledge Biden isn't trying to block either of those.

                              Only non-witches get due process.

                              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                              LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                No, Gore was trying to encourage recounting. Not wipe out a state's election results. This is categorically different.

                                If Trump had to sue to get a recount in GA or WI then you could make that point. But to my knowledge Biden isn't trying to block either of those.

                                LarryL Offline
                                LarryL Offline
                                Larry
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:

                                No, Gore was trying to encourage recounting. Not wipe out a state's election results. This is categorically different.

                                If Trump had to sue to get a recount in GA or WI then you could make that point. But to my knowledge Biden isn't trying to block either of those.

                                Trump is not "trying to wipe out a state's election results". Good grief man, that kook level.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  No really. There’s a new suit filed tonight. He wants the court to prevent the state from certifying the election. That would mean the votes are thrown out and the legislature selects electors.

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                    Read the thread.

                                    KlausK Offline
                                    KlausK Offline
                                    Klaus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:

                                    Read the thread.

                                    37,706 people chose not to participate in the presidential election in Michigan, so the President's lawyers have to either find 146,137 votes that they are 100% sure were cast fraudulently in the presidential race or they have to find
                                    183,843 fraudulent total votes because you aren't allowed to ask anyone how they voted.

                                    I don't understand this part. Does he say only 37706 people didn't vote? What does this have to do with anything?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      He’s saying that 37k people submitted ballots but only marked the ‘lesser’ contests.

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • bachophileB Offline
                                        bachophileB Offline
                                        bachophile
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        As far as I can tell, Michigan Nevada and Georgia law suits have all been dismissed.

                                        Penn still has the post 3 day votes to reckon with which don’t significantly change the tally.

                                        Still waiting for Larry’s fraud eruption which we are supposed to see “in a few days”.

                                        LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • JollyJ Offline
                                          JollyJ Offline
                                          Jolly
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          Ballot harvesting?

                                          https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lindsey-graham-possible-ballot-harvesting-in-pennsylvania-involving-25-000-nursing-home-residents

                                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups