Trump lawsuits
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 14:05 last edited by
Honest question, are there any he’s filed that could even conceivably change anything?
The PA votes mailed before Election Day but arrived after aren’t enough to change anything.
What else does he have pending with actual votes attached to it? Anyone know?
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 14:49 last edited by
Well, there's the 140,000 ballots that arrived in trash bags at 4am that were all for Biden to sort out, and then there's the bogus software that was programmed to change votes from Trump to Biden that was used by around half the country that has to be addressed. You just might be crowing a bit too soon.
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 15:27 last edited by jon-nyc 11 Aug 2020, 15:27
Ok Larry so I should be able to read about that and see the evidence in Trump’s filing.
Right?
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 15:31 last edited by
I think another few days and you'll have more to look at than you ever wanted to see.
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 15:35 last edited by
Ok, I’ll wait.
But that’ll be my filter for what’s worth spending time on. Surely Trump’s team will hear every story you do and if they think there’s anything to it they’ll present it to a judge.
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 15:36 last edited by
@Larry said in Trump lawsuits:
I think another few days and you'll have more to look at than you ever wanted to see.
Kindly link to the Trump campaign's court filings when that time comes, presumably "another few days" from now.
-
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 03:50 last edited by
Here's a day-old link keeping track.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trumps-election-lawsuits-where-the-fights-are-playing-out
-
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 04:20 last edited by
Here's a really thorough list through it doesn't filter by what's pending vs. what's already been dismissed.
-
Ok, I’ll wait.
But that’ll be my filter for what’s worth spending time on. Surely Trump’s team will hear every story you do and if they think there’s anything to it they’ll present it to a judge.
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 07:40 last edited by -
Here's a day-old link keeping track.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trumps-election-lawsuits-where-the-fights-are-playing-out
wrote on 9 Nov 2020, 12:57 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:
Here's a day-old link keeping track.
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trumps-election-lawsuits-where-the-fights-are-playing-outThanks for this, Jon. I've bookmarked it.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 03:23 last edited by jon-nyc 11 Oct 2020, 03:23
Trump has a new suit in PA.
Based on my quick perusal he appears to be asking the courts to issue an order prohibiting the Secretary of State from certifying the results statewide. Not 'until XYZ conditions are fulfilled'. Just prohibit it period.
Make no small plans!
(caveat, it is 105 pages I have just skimmed it and could be misinterpreting it)
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 04:10 last edited by
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 05:23 last edited by
Al Gore did the exact same thing Trump is doing, and he did it in only 3 counties in one state. But when Al Gore did it, the same people saying Trump is just a sore loser defended Al Gore because HE was defending the Constitution and the integrity of the voting process.
The truth is, democrats are hypocrites.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 05:39 last edited by jon-nyc 11 Oct 2020, 05:40
No, Gore was trying to encourage recounting. Not wipe out a state's election results. This is categorically different.
If Trump had to sue to get a recount in GA or WI then you could make that point. But to my knowledge Biden isn't trying to block either of those.
-
No, Gore was trying to encourage recounting. Not wipe out a state's election results. This is categorically different.
If Trump had to sue to get a recount in GA or WI then you could make that point. But to my knowledge Biden isn't trying to block either of those.
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 05:42 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:
No, Gore was trying to encourage recounting. Not wipe out a state's election results. This is categorically different.
If Trump had to sue to get a recount in GA or WI then you could make that point. But to my knowledge Biden isn't trying to block either of those.
Trump is not "trying to wipe out a state's election results". Good grief man, that kook level.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 05:47 last edited by
No really. There’s a new suit filed tonight. He wants the court to prevent the state from certifying the election. That would mean the votes are thrown out and the legislature selects electors.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 08:39 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Trump lawsuits:
Read the thread.
37,706 people chose not to participate in the presidential election in Michigan, so the President's lawyers have to either find 146,137 votes that they are 100% sure were cast fraudulently in the presidential race or they have to find
183,843 fraudulent total votes because you aren't allowed to ask anyone how they voted.I don't understand this part. Does he say only 37706 people didn't vote? What does this have to do with anything?
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 10:19 last edited by
He’s saying that 37k people submitted ballots but only marked the ‘lesser’ contests.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 11:40 last edited by
As far as I can tell, Michigan Nevada and Georgia law suits have all been dismissed.
Penn still has the post 3 day votes to reckon with which don’t significantly change the tally.
Still waiting for Larry’s fraud eruption which we are supposed to see “in a few days”.
-
wrote on 10 Nov 2020, 11:41 last edited by
