Calling the States
-
@George-K - the state of Wisconsin puts their turnout at 71%, which is less than 2004.
The reason is WI uses same day registration, and it is quite popular.
So they measure 'turnout' by % of voting age population. It's worth noting that the very graph you posted is using WI data and calc method (%voting age population) for all of the data points except the last one.
https://elections.wi.gov/elections-voting/statistics/turnout
@jon-nyc said in Calling the States:
The reason is WI uses same day registration, and it is quite popular.
I wonder if the voters who registered on election day account for this:
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@jon-nyc said in Calling the States:
The reason is WI uses same day registration, and it is quite popular.
I wonder if the voters who registered on election day account for this:
@George-K said in Calling the States:
@jon-nyc said in Calling the States:
The reason is WI uses same day registration, and it is quite popular.
I wonder if the voters who registered on election day account for this:
It's their state, but nobody should be allowed to register on election day.
-
It’s perfectly legitimate to ask to see those registrations....
-
-
George - where did you get that info?
This is from county.milwaukee.gov:
You can't see the heading, but the first number is Biden second is Trump:
Same site, registration vs votes cast:
Interestingly I found a file from the Wisconsin elections site from 11/1 showing registrations by ward and the numbers were already higher than the ones in your graphic. And that obviously can't include same-day registrations.
-
George - where did you get that info?
This is from county.milwaukee.gov:
You can't see the heading, but the first number is Biden second is Trump:
Same site, registration vs votes cast:
Interestingly I found a file from the Wisconsin elections site from 11/1 showing registrations by ward and the numbers were already higher than the ones in your graphic. And that obviously can't include same-day registrations.
@jon-nyc said in Calling the States:
George - where did you get that info?
Kimberly Strassel tweeted it. Here's the link she tweeted (it was in my post as well). I know nothing of this source, or it's reliability, btw.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
Her source was a Milwaukee Newspaper. I followed the links earlier.
The Brad
-
Her source was a Milwaukee Newspaper. I followed the links earlier.
@LuFins-Dad said in Calling the States:
Her source was a Milwaukee Newspaper. I followed the links earlier.
Now you trust the media more than the state government?
-
I do worry a bit that we could be moving into some dangerous territory.
The Brad
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Calling the States:
Her source was a Milwaukee Newspaper. I followed the links earlier.
Now you trust the media more than the state government?
@Axtremus said in Calling the States:
@LuFins-Dad said in Calling the States:
Her source was a Milwaukee Newspaper. I followed the links earlier.
Now you trust the media more than the state government?
Just gave the cite...
-
Her source was a Milwaukee Newspaper. I followed the links earlier.
@LuFins-Dad said in Calling the States:
Her source was a Milwaukee Newspaper. I followed the links earlier.
The only link in the piece was a static map of the wards from 2011.
-
@jon-nyc said in Calling the States:
George - where did you get that info?
Kimberly Strassel tweeted it. Here's the link she tweeted (it was in my post as well). I know nothing of this source, or it's reliability, btw.
@George-K said in Calling the States:
@jon-nyc said in Calling the States:
George - where did you get that info?
Kimberly Strassel tweeted it. Here's the link she tweeted (it was in my post as well). I know nothing of this source, or it's reliability, btw.
The Brad
-
