Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The America Party?

The America Party?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
23 Posts 11 Posters 228 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    Maybe. Since 2016 I’ve thought we don’t need a third party since with social media anyone sufficiently popular can commandeer one of the existing ones. That’s probably true now of the Democratic Party too though it held out a little longer.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

    X 1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 Offline
      89th8 Offline
      89th
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        If we could have an America party like that and leave the GOP to the magats and the dems to the woke I’d be happy.

        Thank you for your attention to this matter.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • KlausK Offline
          KlausK Offline
          Klaus
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          But is it realistic? In the American election system, a two party system is basically the only stable configuration. It would take an immense splash to replace one of the parties with a different one. Three parties of approximately equal size could only exist very transiently, I guess.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            Pretty much.

            In the past the third party has subsumed a dying second party.

            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              Where we are now is both parties are caricatures of their former reasonable selves. Maybe over time they will both die and be subsumed. One can only hope.

              "The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil

              1 Reply Last reply
              • kluursK Offline
                kluursK Offline
                kluurs
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed - with a narrow focus - to reorder the most egregious idiocy of the current system - term limits, establishment of a system that negates gerrymandering, something that limits congressional and judicial enrichment - - essentially new guardrails that inhibit governmental overreach - along with protections for the proverbial "common man/woman". One might suggest limiting the disproportionate influence of certain external actors - but then one might be accused of being anti-Christian, antisemitic, anti-woke, anti-union, or anti-something.

                89th8 LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
                  #10

                  We've already got antediluvian

                  I was only joking

                  MikM 1 Reply Last reply
                  • W Offline
                    W Offline
                    Wim
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    An opportunity for the Communist Party of the USA 😁😁😁

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • kluursK kluurs

                      I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed - with a narrow focus - to reorder the most egregious idiocy of the current system - term limits, establishment of a system that negates gerrymandering, something that limits congressional and judicial enrichment - - essentially new guardrails that inhibit governmental overreach - along with protections for the proverbial "common man/woman". One might suggest limiting the disproportionate influence of certain external actors - but then one might be accused of being anti-Christian, antisemitic, anti-woke, anti-union, or anti-something.

                      89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @kluurs said in The America Party?:

                      I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed

                      Yeah, most guys agree... preferably a female 3rd party

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • 89th8 89th

                        The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @89th said in The America Party?:

                        The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                        LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                        The Brad

                        89th8 jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        • kluursK kluurs

                          I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed - with a narrow focus - to reorder the most egregious idiocy of the current system - term limits, establishment of a system that negates gerrymandering, something that limits congressional and judicial enrichment - - essentially new guardrails that inhibit governmental overreach - along with protections for the proverbial "common man/woman". One might suggest limiting the disproportionate influence of certain external actors - but then one might be accused of being anti-Christian, antisemitic, anti-woke, anti-union, or anti-something.

                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          @kluurs said in The America Party?:

                          I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed - with a narrow focus - to reorder the most egregious idiocy of the current system - term limits, establishment of a system that negates gerrymandering, something that limits congressional and judicial enrichment - - essentially new guardrails that inhibit governmental overreach - along with protections for the proverbial "common man/woman". One might suggest limiting the disproportionate influence of certain external actors - but then one might be accused of being anti-Christian, antisemitic, anti-woke, anti-union, or anti-something.

                          The problem is all the roadblocks the two parties have placed on state elections to prevent third parties from gaining traction. Perot 1.0 really was quite impressive in how far he got.

                          The Brad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                            We've already got antediluvian

                            MikM Offline
                            MikM Offline
                            Mik
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            @Doctor-Phibes said in The America Party?:

                            We've already got antediluvian

                            Snort

                            "The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                              @89th said in The America Party?:

                              The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                              LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                              89th8 Offline
                              89th8 Offline
                              89th
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              @LuFins-Dad said in The America Party?:

                              @89th said in The America Party?:

                              The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                              LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                              To be honest, I actually have no idea. Maybe Clinton was lucky to also have the 90s... before "modern" issues like global jihad, school shootings, internet crap, social media crap, cell phones, on-demand ADHD attention spans... from a simplistic perspective, the budget was balanced (actually had surplus), the stock market boomed, and Israel and Palestine were shaking hands. And Monica was sneaking out of the white house.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                @89th said in The America Party?:

                                The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                                LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                                jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                                #17

                                @LuFins-Dad said in The America Party?:

                                @89th said in The America Party?:

                                The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                                LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                                Yes. Woodward wrote a good book about it called The Agenda, describing how deficit reduction won out against his other priorities. From this era came Carville’s famous line about coming back as the bond markets.

                                And all this happened before Gingrich was speaker.

                                Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                  Maybe. Since 2016 I’ve thought we don’t need a third party since with social media anyone sufficiently popular can commandeer one of the existing ones. That’s probably true now of the Democratic Party too though it held out a little longer.

                                  X Offline
                                  X Offline
                                  xenon
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @jon-nyc said in The America Party?:

                                  Maybe. Since 2016 I’ve thought we don’t need a third party since with social media anyone sufficiently popular can commandeer one of the existing ones. That’s probably true now of the Democratic Party too though it held out a little longer.

                                  I think you're right about this, Jon. But I don't think anyone has really pushed this.

                                  A lot of a party's power comes from funding, which goes to traditional media, which goes to getting a message to the mainstream.

                                  As Mamdani recently demonstrated, you can be a nobody if you can make effective viral videos.

                                  I think the parties have much less power right now than is recognized.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nycJ Offline
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins Dad
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #20

                                      alt text

                                      The Brad

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • HoraceH Offline
                                        HoraceH Offline
                                        Horace
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #21

                                        One or two good ideas, in moderation, might be ok in a political party. But we must remain respectful of the portion of the electorate who prefer bad ideas. A truly viable third party must not contain good ideas at a ratio higher than 1:10.

                                        Education is extremely important.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                                          taiwan_girl
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #22

                                          I would be interested in seeing something on what they stand for.

                                          Just saying that they are different from the two major party's is not enough. (On second thought, maybe it is. LOL)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups