Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The America Party?

The America Party?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
18 Posts 10 Posters 105 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    Pretty much.

    In the past the third party has subsumed a dying second party.

    "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
    -Cormac McCarthy

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      Where we are now is both parties are caricatures of their former reasonable selves. Maybe over time they will both die and be subsumed. One can only hope.

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply
      • kluursK Offline
        kluursK Offline
        kluurs
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed - with a narrow focus - to reorder the most egregious idiocy of the current system - term limits, establishment of a system that negates gerrymandering, something that limits congressional and judicial enrichment - - essentially new guardrails that inhibit governmental overreach - along with protections for the proverbial "common man/woman". One might suggest limiting the disproportionate influence of certain external actors - but then one might be accused of being anti-Christian, antisemitic, anti-woke, anti-union, or anti-something.

        89th8 LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
        • Doctor PhibesD Online
          Doctor PhibesD Online
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
          #10

          We've already got antediluvian

          I was only joking

          MikM 1 Reply Last reply
          • W Offline
            W Offline
            Wim
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            An opportunity for the Communist Party of the USA 😁😁😁

            1 Reply Last reply
            • kluursK kluurs

              I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed - with a narrow focus - to reorder the most egregious idiocy of the current system - term limits, establishment of a system that negates gerrymandering, something that limits congressional and judicial enrichment - - essentially new guardrails that inhibit governmental overreach - along with protections for the proverbial "common man/woman". One might suggest limiting the disproportionate influence of certain external actors - but then one might be accused of being anti-Christian, antisemitic, anti-woke, anti-union, or anti-something.

              89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @kluurs said in The America Party?:

              I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed

              Yeah, most guys agree... preferably a female 3rd party

              1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 89th

                The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @89th said in The America Party?:

                The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                The Brad

                89th8 jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                • kluursK kluurs

                  I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed - with a narrow focus - to reorder the most egregious idiocy of the current system - term limits, establishment of a system that negates gerrymandering, something that limits congressional and judicial enrichment - - essentially new guardrails that inhibit governmental overreach - along with protections for the proverbial "common man/woman". One might suggest limiting the disproportionate influence of certain external actors - but then one might be accused of being anti-Christian, antisemitic, anti-woke, anti-union, or anti-something.

                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins DadL Offline
                  LuFins Dad
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @kluurs said in The America Party?:

                  I've always fantasized that a third party should be formed - with a narrow focus - to reorder the most egregious idiocy of the current system - term limits, establishment of a system that negates gerrymandering, something that limits congressional and judicial enrichment - - essentially new guardrails that inhibit governmental overreach - along with protections for the proverbial "common man/woman". One might suggest limiting the disproportionate influence of certain external actors - but then one might be accused of being anti-Christian, antisemitic, anti-woke, anti-union, or anti-something.

                  The problem is all the roadblocks the two parties have placed on state elections to prevent third parties from gaining traction. Perot 1.0 really was quite impressive in how far he got.

                  The Brad

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                    We've already got antediluvian

                    MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @Doctor-Phibes said in The America Party?:

                    We've already got antediluvian

                    Snort

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                      @89th said in The America Party?:

                      The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                      LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                      89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @LuFins-Dad said in The America Party?:

                      @89th said in The America Party?:

                      The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                      LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                      To be honest, I actually have no idea. Maybe Clinton was lucky to also have the 90s... before "modern" issues like global jihad, school shootings, internet crap, social media crap, cell phones, on-demand ADHD attention spans... from a simplistic perspective, the budget was balanced (actually had surplus), the stock market boomed, and Israel and Palestine were shaking hands. And Monica was sneaking out of the white house.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                        @89th said in The America Party?:

                        The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                        LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                        #17

                        @LuFins-Dad said in The America Party?:

                        @89th said in The America Party?:

                        The commandeering lately has been in the fringe direction, it seems. Would be nice to have a party that attracted the moderates (the meat of the bell curve), ideally one that is fiscally responsible, strong military, judicially conservative, invests in the American economy and infrastructure, and empathetic to the vulnerable with pragmatic programs to help those in need. In other words, maybe we need Bill Clinton again?

                        LOL, you think that was Bill Clinton’s actual policies and not the compromise positions due to the Gingrich Congress…

                        Yes. Woodward wrote a good book about it called The Agenda, describing how deficit reduction won out against his other priorities. From this era came Carville’s famous line about coming back as the bond markets.

                        And all this happened before Gingrich was speaker.

                        "You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
                        -Cormac McCarthy

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                          Maybe. Since 2016 I’ve thought we don’t need a third party since with social media anyone sufficiently popular can commandeer one of the existing ones. That’s probably true now of the Democratic Party too though it held out a little longer.

                          X Offline
                          X Offline
                          xenon
                          wrote last edited by
                          #18

                          @jon-nyc said in The America Party?:

                          Maybe. Since 2016 I’ve thought we don’t need a third party since with social media anyone sufficiently popular can commandeer one of the existing ones. That’s probably true now of the Democratic Party too though it held out a little longer.

                          I think you're right about this, Jon. But I don't think anyone has really pushed this.

                          A lot of a party's power comes from funding, which goes to traditional media, which goes to getting a message to the mainstream.

                          As Mamdani recently demonstrated, you can be a nobody if you can make effective viral videos.

                          I think the parties have much less power right now than is recognized.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups