Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
898 Posts 19 Posters 17.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LuFins DadL Offline
    LuFins DadL Offline
    LuFins Dad
    wrote on last edited by
    #545

    Elon has been very quiet about the tariffs until the last few days.

    The Brad

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #546

      Yeah. Very quiet.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        Yeah. Very quiet.

        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on last edited by
        #547

        @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

        Yeah. Very quiet.

        But not so much the last two days. What happens as the split widens over tariffs?

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote on last edited by Renauda
          #548

          Musk has now called out Navarro as being “dumber than a sack of bricks”:

          https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdrgx4ky1xxo

          Sounds like the malice in wonderland theatrical hit of the first term may be on for an encore.

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote on last edited by
            #549

            Trump just posted about all of the "negotiations" he's doing with other countries. That is an easy off-ramp from the tariffs, if he chooses to take it.

            Education is extremely important.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by Jolly
              #550

              Don't buy the bullshit.

              Example: On supposedly Black Monday, CNN was running the stock tickers all day and telling us all how bad Trump had screwed up.

              Today, the market is up a bit and a stock ticker is no longer scrolling across the bottom of the screen. The media is going to do everything it can to generate clicks through Trump doomporn.

              I haven't been adding to my investments in awhile. I think today I start dollar averaging the Roth and will continue to do so for the next 18 months.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
              • LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote on last edited by
                #551

                Okay, so moving beyond the outright tariff policies, there has been a lot of talk about non-tariff trade barriers including currency manipulation. Is that accurate? And what are the other trade barriers they are alluding to?

                And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                The Brad

                HoraceH jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
                • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                  Okay, so moving beyond the outright tariff policies, there has been a lot of talk about non-tariff trade barriers including currency manipulation. Is that accurate? And what are the other trade barriers they are alluding to?

                  And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                  HoraceH Offline
                  HoraceH Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #552

                  @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                  Okay, so moving beyond the outright tariff policies, there has been a lot of talk about non-tariff trade barriers including currency manipulation. Is that accurate? And what are the other trade barriers they are alluding to?

                  I think they've pivoted to this because they can hand-wave "non-tariff barriers", but not tariffs, which are publicly known and unambiguous. The example of a non-tariff barrier I've heard them use is a VAT, or sales tax, in Europe, and I've heard that calling that a barrier is nonsense, because it applies to Europe's own domestic products too.

                  And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                  I'm hoping "trade deficits" are computed per-capita. They still wouldn't be a bad thing per se, but at least they would be a reasonable thing to talk about.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Jolly

                    Don't buy the bullshit.

                    Example: On supposedly Black Monday, CNN was running the stock tickers all day and telling us all how bad Trump had screwed up.

                    Today, the market is up a bit and a stock ticker is no longer scrolling across the bottom of the screen. The media is going to do everything it can to generate clicks through Trump doomporn.

                    I haven't been adding to my investments in awhile. I think today I start dollar averaging the Roth and will continue to do so for the next 18 months.

                    HoraceH Offline
                    HoraceH Offline
                    Horace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #553

                    @Jolly said in Trumpenomics:

                    Don't buy the bullshit.

                    I don't think the damage done to the world economy by universal tariffs, is bullshit.

                    There is a case to be made that a more protectionist America is a more economically resilient America, so there is that, but the economic efficiency of tariff-free trading will be missed hugely, and everybody will feel it, if it goes.

                    Education is extremely important.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote on last edited by 89th
                      #554

                      It was only the worst 3-day run for the S&P since the 1987 crash, and as CNN displayed the ticker, Fox removed their stock ticker for the first time to hide the news from granny in the nursing home.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • HoraceH Horace

                        @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                        Okay, so moving beyond the outright tariff policies, there has been a lot of talk about non-tariff trade barriers including currency manipulation. Is that accurate? And what are the other trade barriers they are alluding to?

                        I think they've pivoted to this because they can hand-wave "non-tariff barriers", but not tariffs, which are publicly known and unambiguous. The example of a non-tariff barrier I've heard them use is a VAT, or sales tax, in Europe, and I've heard that calling that a barrier is nonsense, because it applies to Europe's own domestic products too.

                        And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                        I'm hoping "trade deficits" are computed per-capita. They still wouldn't be a bad thing per se, but at least they would be a reasonable thing to talk about.

                        89th8 Offline
                        89th8 Offline
                        89th
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #555

                        @Horace said in Trumpenomics:

                        And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                        I'm hoping "trade deficits" are computed per-capita. They still wouldn't be a bad thing per se, but at least they would be a reasonable thing to talk about.

                        I'm a bit concerned there is a concern about trade deficits in the first place. They aren't inherently bad, and one could argue in the current environment, they're actually a good thing most of the time. We're also in a global economy...different countries produce different goods with respective efficiencies. Let USA focus on what we're good at, let China do what they're good at. Plus it promotes peace, to an extent, too.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor PhibesD Offline
                          Doctor Phibes
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #556

                          The idea that trade deficits are inherently bad really is surprisingly stupid. Does Trump actually believe this?

                          I was only joking

                          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                          • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                            Okay, so moving beyond the outright tariff policies, there has been a lot of talk about non-tariff trade barriers including currency manipulation. Is that accurate? And what are the other trade barriers they are alluding to?

                            And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #557

                            @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                            And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                            Buy more weapons.

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            kluursK 1 Reply Last reply
                            • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                              The idea that trade deficits are inherently bad really is surprisingly stupid. Does Trump actually believe this?

                              RenaudaR Offline
                              RenaudaR Offline
                              Renauda
                              wrote on last edited by Renauda
                              #558

                              @Doctor-Phibes

                              The idea that trade deficits are inherently bad really is surprisingly stupid. Does Trump actually believe this?

                              Yes, I am convinced he actually does. He also equates purchasing something as a subsidy. He is quite thick headed that way.

                              Elbows up!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins DadL Offline
                                LuFins Dad
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #559

                                Broad swaths of Western PA, Eastern Ohio, and Michigan view trade deficits as the reason why they and their communities are riddled with drugs, overdoses, and rusted out husks of factories. They don’t blame their unions, which essentially drove the factories into bankruptcy, but instead blame the foreign manufacturers. Japanese steel, in particular. Trump feels beholden to those groups. They got him elected, after all.

                                The Brad

                                RenaudaR Doctor PhibesD 2 Replies Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                  @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                                  And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                                  Buy more weapons.

                                  kluursK Offline
                                  kluursK Offline
                                  kluurs
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #560

                                  @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                                  @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                                  And as a side note, Netanyahu is now saying he planes on eliminating the trade deficit between Israel and the US. Please explain to me how a nation of 10M can possibly equal the economic consumption of a nation of 350M? Especially when much of that trade is based on precious jewels, which the US has little industry in mining…

                                  Buy more weapons.

                                  We'll have to give them more money to do that - so perhaps, they should arrange to contribute more to Trump, his relative and of course, to member of congress and their families.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                    Broad swaths of Western PA, Eastern Ohio, and Michigan view trade deficits as the reason why they and their communities are riddled with drugs, overdoses, and rusted out husks of factories. They don’t blame their unions, which essentially drove the factories into bankruptcy, but instead blame the foreign manufacturers. Japanese steel, in particular. Trump feels beholden to those groups. They got him elected, after all.

                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    RenaudaR Offline
                                    Renauda
                                    wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                    #561

                                    @LuFins-Dad

                                    Broad swaths of Western PA, Eastern Ohio, and Michigan view trade deficits as the reason why they and their communities are riddled with drugs, overdoses, and rusted out husks of factories. They don’t blame their unions, which essentially drove the factories into bankruptcy, but instead blame the foreign manufacturers. Japanese steel, in particular. Trump feels beholden to those groups. They got him elected, after all.

                                    That very well may be the case, although I hope the angry proletarian rabble understands that it is just a matter of time before Trump will turn against their sacred cow labour unions. Cost of hourly US labour plus benefits is far too high for the Trump agenda (if there is indeed one) to even get off the ground.

                                    That may be the time you predicted to see Vance’s exit; either sidelined from the Emporer’s court or jettisoned altogether.

                                    Elbows up!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #562

                                      He was elected. Trump can’t fire him.

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                        Broad swaths of Western PA, Eastern Ohio, and Michigan view trade deficits as the reason why they and their communities are riddled with drugs, overdoses, and rusted out husks of factories. They don’t blame their unions, which essentially drove the factories into bankruptcy, but instead blame the foreign manufacturers. Japanese steel, in particular. Trump feels beholden to those groups. They got him elected, after all.

                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor PhibesD Offline
                                        Doctor Phibes
                                        wrote on last edited by Doctor Phibes
                                        #563

                                        @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                                        Broad swaths of Western PA, Eastern Ohio, and Michigan view trade deficits as the reason why they and their communities are riddled with drugs, overdoses, and rusted out husks of factories. They don’t blame their unions, which essentially drove the factories into bankruptcy, but instead blame the foreign manufacturers. Japanese steel, in particular. Trump feels beholden to those groups. They got him elected, after all.

                                        Right, so he thinks (or pretends to, at least) that he can make US manufacturing competitive without reducing the salaries to competitive levels by taxing the shit out of foreign products and we can all go back to living in the golden age of the 1970's.

                                        Funnily enough, I remember the 1970's as being a bit shit, to be honest.

                                        I was only joking

                                        LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                                          @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                                          Broad swaths of Western PA, Eastern Ohio, and Michigan view trade deficits as the reason why they and their communities are riddled with drugs, overdoses, and rusted out husks of factories. They don’t blame their unions, which essentially drove the factories into bankruptcy, but instead blame the foreign manufacturers. Japanese steel, in particular. Trump feels beholden to those groups. They got him elected, after all.

                                          Right, so he thinks (or pretends to, at least) that he can make US manufacturing competitive without reducing the salaries to competitive levels by taxing the shit out of foreign products and we can all go back to living in the golden age of the 1970's.

                                          Funnily enough, I remember the 1970's as being a bit shit, to be honest.

                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins DadL Offline
                                          LuFins Dad
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #564

                                          @Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:

                                          @LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:

                                          Broad swaths of Western PA, Eastern Ohio, and Michigan view trade deficits as the reason why they and their communities are riddled with drugs, overdoses, and rusted out husks of factories. They don’t blame their unions, which essentially drove the factories into bankruptcy, but instead blame the foreign manufacturers. Japanese steel, in particular. Trump feels beholden to those groups. They got him elected, after all.

                                          Right, so he thinks (or pretends to, at least) that he can make US manufacturing competitive without reducing the salaries to competitive levels by taxing the shit out of foreign products and we can all go back to living in the golden age of the 1970's.

                                          Funnily enough, I remember the 1970's as being a bit shit, to be honest.

                                          Not at all. I very much doubt that’s the goal. Oh, he would like to bring some more manufacturing back to the US, but the little that does happen to come back will go to Texas or Florida. States that are more competitive in recruiting business interests. The fact is that Western Pennsylvania has been too ruined by poor work ethics and standards thanks to those unions that it won’t recover through manufacturing, but the area is slowly being rehabilitated through gentrification. And they hate that, too. But oh well.

                                          The Brad

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups