Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.1k Posts 20 Posters 44.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    But that’s sort of irrelevant.

    I think what we’re seeing here is that most industries aren’t making expansion plans in the face of economic uncertainty. That economic uncertainty, perhaps uniquely in our economic history, has a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
    #1067

    @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

    a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

    I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

    I was only joking

    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
    • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

      @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

      a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

      I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

      RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote last edited by Renauda
      #1068

      @Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:

      @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

      a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

      I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

      Maybe Trump was just confused and mistook an estimated savings range of 1% to 5% with a net reduction of 1500%.

      That or Trump just rounded up to 1500% for the sake of simplicity.

      Elbows up!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote last edited by
        #1069

        Get your back-to-school shopping done early before tariffs hit:

        https://thehill.com/homenews/education/5435418-back-to-school-trump-tariffs-trade-war/

        1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote last edited by
          #1070

          Japan's trade deal:

          https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/08/08/us-japan-trade-deal-dispute/

          With no provisions committed to a formal document, the fact sheets that both governments released have conflicting information.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
            #1071

            I assume ‘70%’ refers to the portion of the tariff that will hit consumers come fall.

            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote last edited by
              #1072

              Yeah I'd imagine not many companies will just "eat" the import tax without passing it onto the price

              1 Reply Last reply
              • AxtremusA Offline
                AxtremusA Offline
                Axtremus
                wrote last edited by
                #1073

                Another 90-day pause on tariffs on imports from China:

                https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/11/trump-china-tariffs-deal-deadline

                1 Reply Last reply
                • X Offline
                  X Offline
                  xenon
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1074

                  The economy is going to be stuck in 3rd gear until these guys can decide whether to shit or get off the pot.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1075

                    They may try to occupy the pot and edge forever.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                      #1076

                      Trump calls for Goldman Sachs to replace the economist responsible for the tariff report.

                      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • 89th8 Offline
                        89th8 Offline
                        89th
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1077

                        I wonder how bad the facts culture is within the White House... I expect if anyone tells Trump real data it's like a recurring "Hitler finds out" scene playing over and over.

                        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                        • 89th8 89th

                          I wonder how bad the facts culture is within the White House... I expect if anyone tells Trump real data it's like a recurring "Hitler finds out" scene playing over and over.

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1078

                          @89th

                          😂

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1079

                            The data:

                            And the memes

                            16a567fd-b637-46b6-88b9-f5a946f35704.jpeg

                            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Offline
                              AxtremusA Offline
                              Axtremus
                              wrote last edited by
                              #1080

                              Just put your MAHA hat on and tell yourself it's to get you to eat leaner protein.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • 89th8 Offline
                                89th8 Offline
                                89th
                                wrote last edited by
                                #1081

                                image.png

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #1082

                                  It surely does suck. I’ve been consoling myself with the fact that the Federal Government is no longer actively enabling the sterilization and genital disfigurement of children… I’ll live with having to cut down on steak in exchange for that.

                                  Sure would have been nice to have both steak and healthy children, though.

                                  The Brad

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • AxtremusA Offline
                                    AxtremusA Offline
                                    Axtremus
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #1083

                                    Still better than the alternative, right, @LuFins-Dad ?

                                    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                      Still better than the alternative, right, @LuFins-Dad ?

                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins Dad
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #1084

                                      @Axtremus said in Trumpenomics:

                                      Still better than the alternative, right, @LuFins-Dad ?

                                      Reading comprehension fail? That’s what I pretty specifically said.

                                      The Brad

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • 89th8 Offline
                                        89th8 Offline
                                        89th
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #1085

                                        The good news is the government won’t be able to fund sex changes ever again in the future either because in like 10 years we’ll be fresh out of any spending money at all as the interest on national debt absorbs every tax dollar.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups