Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.1k Posts 20 Posters 43.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
    #1065

    ChatGPT says of the 16.1 Million jobs created during the Biden administration, 1.4MM were in the government sector.

    Grok estimates 15.6MM total jobs, though it acknowledges (without prompting) that some sources have it at 16.1. Of its estimated 15.6 MM new jobs it puts 1.7MM as government jobs.

    So that’s an average of between 290k and 304k non-governmental jobs per month added during the prior administration.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #1066

      But that’s sort of irrelevant.

      I think what we’re seeing here is that most industries aren’t making expansion plans in the face of economic uncertainty. That economic uncertainty, perhaps uniquely in our economic history, has a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        But that’s sort of irrelevant.

        I think what we’re seeing here is that most industries aren’t making expansion plans in the face of economic uncertainty. That economic uncertainty, perhaps uniquely in our economic history, has a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

        Doctor PhibesD Offline
        Doctor PhibesD Offline
        Doctor Phibes
        wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
        #1067

        @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

        a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

        I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

        I was only joking

        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
        • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

          @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

          a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

          I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

          RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote last edited by Renauda
          #1068

          @Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:

          @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

          a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

          I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

          Maybe Trump was just confused and mistook an estimated savings range of 1% to 5% with a net reduction of 1500%.

          That or Trump just rounded up to 1500% for the sake of simplicity.

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote last edited by
            #1069

            Get your back-to-school shopping done early before tariffs hit:

            https://thehill.com/homenews/education/5435418-back-to-school-trump-tariffs-trade-war/

            1 Reply Last reply
            • AxtremusA Offline
              AxtremusA Offline
              Axtremus
              wrote last edited by
              #1070

              Japan's trade deal:

              https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/08/08/us-japan-trade-deal-dispute/

              With no provisions committed to a formal document, the fact sheets that both governments released have conflicting information.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                #1071

                I assume ‘70%’ refers to the portion of the tariff that will hit consumers come fall.

                Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1072

                  Yeah I'd imagine not many companies will just "eat" the import tax without passing it onto the price

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1073

                    Another 90-day pause on tariffs on imports from China:

                    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/11/trump-china-tariffs-deal-deadline

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • X Offline
                      X Offline
                      xenon
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1074

                      The economy is going to be stuck in 3rd gear until these guys can decide whether to shit or get off the pot.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1075

                        They may try to occupy the pot and edge forever.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups