Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.1k Posts 20 Posters 43.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #1062

    It’s always interesting to see how much these otherwise intelligent people are willing to debase themselves in front of their entire profession (and be complicit in harming the American economy) all in service to Donald Trump.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      75% of the new jobs were in healthcare. That seems odd. Maybe that’s just a normal month in an industry that is growing as a percentage of gdp.

      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #1063

      @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

      75% of the new jobs were in healthcare. That seems odd. Maybe that’s just a normal month in an industry that is growing as a percentage of gdp.

      In fact if you take out healthcare and private education there was a net loss of 43k jobs.

      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

      LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

        75% of the new jobs were in healthcare. That seems odd. Maybe that’s just a normal month in an industry that is growing as a percentage of gdp.

        In fact if you take out healthcare and private education there was a net loss of 43k jobs.

        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote last edited by
        #1064

        @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

        @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

        75% of the new jobs were in healthcare. That seems odd. Maybe that’s just a normal month in an industry that is growing as a percentage of gdp.

        In fact if you take out healthcare and private education there was a net loss of 43k jobs.

        Compare and contrast if you took out new government jobs from 21-25…

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by jon-nyc
          #1065

          ChatGPT says of the 16.1 Million jobs created during the Biden administration, 1.4MM were in the government sector.

          Grok estimates 15.6MM total jobs, though it acknowledges (without prompting) that some sources have it at 16.1. Of its estimated 15.6 MM new jobs it puts 1.7MM as government jobs.

          So that’s an average of between 290k and 304k non-governmental jobs per month added during the prior administration.

          Thank you for your attention to this matter.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #1066

            But that’s sort of irrelevant.

            I think what we’re seeing here is that most industries aren’t making expansion plans in the face of economic uncertainty. That economic uncertainty, perhaps uniquely in our economic history, has a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

            Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              But that’s sort of irrelevant.

              I think what we’re seeing here is that most industries aren’t making expansion plans in the face of economic uncertainty. That economic uncertainty, perhaps uniquely in our economic history, has a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

              Doctor PhibesD Online
              Doctor PhibesD Online
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
              #1067

              @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

              a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

              I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

              I was only joking

              RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
              • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

                I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

                RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote last edited by Renauda
                #1068

                @Doctor-Phibes said in Trumpenomics:

                @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                a single author who just fired the head of his labor statistics department.

                I wonder if he was actually fired for pointing out that a 1500% decrease in expense is something that only a moron would talk about.

                Maybe Trump was just confused and mistook an estimated savings range of 1% to 5% with a net reduction of 1500%.

                That or Trump just rounded up to 1500% for the sake of simplicity.

                Elbows up!

                1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Offline
                  AxtremusA Offline
                  Axtremus
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1069

                  Get your back-to-school shopping done early before tariffs hit:

                  https://thehill.com/homenews/education/5435418-back-to-school-trump-tariffs-trade-war/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1070

                    Japan's trade deal:

                    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/08/08/us-japan-trade-deal-dispute/

                    With no provisions committed to a formal document, the fact sheets that both governments released have conflicting information.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                      #1071

                      I assume ‘70%’ refers to the portion of the tariff that will hit consumers come fall.

                      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • 89th8 Online
                        89th8 Online
                        89th
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1072

                        Yeah I'd imagine not many companies will just "eat" the import tax without passing it onto the price

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • AxtremusA Offline
                          AxtremusA Offline
                          Axtremus
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1073

                          Another 90-day pause on tariffs on imports from China:

                          https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/11/trump-china-tariffs-deal-deadline

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • X Offline
                            X Offline
                            xenon
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1074

                            The economy is going to be stuck in 3rd gear until these guys can decide whether to shit or get off the pot.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Offline
                              AxtremusA Offline
                              Axtremus
                              wrote last edited by
                              #1075

                              They may try to occupy the pot and edge forever.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups